| Literature DB >> 31223577 |
Yuli Gou1, Jing Yi1, Mei Jiang1, Chunhong Cao2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effects of comprehensive nursing intervention in interventional therapy for patients with liver cirrhosis and liver cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Complication; Comprehensive nursing care; Interventional therapy; Liver cirrhosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31223577 PMCID: PMC6570817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Comparisons of clinical data of the two groups of patients [n (%)]
| Gender [n (%)] | 0.413 | 0.720 | ||
| Male | 262 (84.52) | 176 (87.13) | ||
| Female | 48 (15.48) | 26 (12.87) | ||
| Age(yr) | 51.32±6.14 | 52.14±8.25 | 1.287 | 0.199 |
| TNM staging [n (%)] | 0.003 | 0.958 | ||
| Stage I–II | 145 (46.77) | 94 (46.53) | ||
| Stage III–IV | 165 (53.23) | 108 (53.47) | ||
| Smoking [n (%)] | 0.272 | 0.602 | ||
| Yes | 217 (70.00) | 137 (67.82) | ||
| No | 93 (30.00) | 65 (32.18) | ||
| Drinking [n (%)] | 1.306 | 0.253 | ||
| Yes | 248 (80.00) | 153 (75.74) | ||
| No | 62 (20.00) | 49 (24.26) | ||
| Place of residence [n (%)] | 1.546 | 0.214 | ||
| City | 239 (77.10) | 165 (81.68) | ||
| Countryside | 71 (22.90) | 37 (18.32) | ||
| Exercise habit [n (%)] | 1.523 | 1.234 | ||
| No | 239 (77.10) | 146 (72.28) | ||
| Yes | 71 (22.90) | 56 (27.72) |
Note: In both groups, the proportion of male
is higher than that of female (P<0.05); the ratio of smoking
patients exceeds that of non-smoking patients (P<0.001); the proportion of drinking
patients is higher than that of non-drinking patients (P<0.001); the ratio of patients with urban household
exceeds that of patients with rural household (P<0.05), and the proportion of patients without exercise habits
is higher than that of patients with exercise habits (P<0.05)
Results of satisfaction survey [n (%)]
| Degree of satisfaction (%) | 99.35 | 89.11 | 0.698 | 0.403 |
| Very satisfied | 256 (82.58) | 67 (33.17) | 31.75 | <0.001 |
| Satisfied | 52 (16.77) | 113 (55.94) | 42.27 | <0.001 |
| Not satisfied | 2 (0.65) | 22 (10.89) | 25.69 | <0.001 |
Results of quality-of-life scoring (point)
| Average score | 84.42±7.28 | 68.31±10.94 | 20.01 | <0.001 |
| Physical function | 83.01±7.55 | 69.52±9.52 | 17.80 | <0.001 |
| Cognitive function | 81.13±8.68 | 71.15±9.21 | 12.41 | <0.001 |
| Function of social activities | 88.64±7.03 | 70.68±9.35 | 24.75 | <0.001 |
| No unhealthy emotion | 81.98±8.54 | 60.78±10.97 | 24.49 | <0.001 |
| No disease recurrence | 87.22±7.70 | 68.19±6.14 | 29.53 | <0.001 |
| No pains | 84.56±8.16 | 69.52±8.98 | 19.59 | <0.001 |
Fig. 1:Survival rate at 20 months after operation of the two groups of patients
It is indicated in the statistical results of the patients’ survival rates at 20 months after interventional therapy in the two groups that there are no statistically significant differences in the 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month survival rates in the two groups of patients, while the survival rate at 20 months after operation in observation group is obviously lower than that in control group (71.3% vs. 64.2%, P<0.05)