Literature DB >> 31220936

Utility of the Cardiovascular Physical Examination and Impact of Spironolactone in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Senthil Selvaraj1, Brian Claggett2, Sanjiv J Shah3, Inder S Anand4, Jean L Rouleau5, Akshay S Desai2, Eldrin F Lewis2, Muthiah Vaduganathan2, Stephen Y Wang2, Bertram Pitt6, Nancy K Sweitzer7, Marc A Pfeffer2, Scott D Solomon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of physical examination, its relation to quality of life, and influence of therapy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is not well known. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied participants from the Americas with available physical examination (jugular venous distention, rales, and edema) at baseline in the TOPCAT trial (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist). The association of the number of signs of congestion with the primary outcome (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization), its individual components, and all-cause mortality was assessed using time-updated, multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses. We evaluated whether spironolactone improved congestion at 4 months and whether improvement in congestion was related to quality of life as assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary scores and to outcomes. Among 1644 participants, 22%, 54%, 20%, and 4% had 0, 1, 2, and 3 signs of congestion, respectively, at baseline. After multivariable adjustment, each additional increase in sign of congestion was associated with a 30% to 60% increased risk of each outcome ( P<0.001). Spironolactone reduced the total number of signs of congestion by -0.10 ( P=0.005) signs, jugular venous distention (odds ratio, 0.60; P=0.01), and edema (odds ratio, 0.74; P=0.006) at 4 months compared with placebo. Each reduction in sign of congestion was independently associated with a 4.0 (95% CI, 2.4-5.6) point improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score. When assessed simultaneously, time-updated, but not baseline congestion, predicted outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the physical exam provides independent prognostic value for adverse outcomes. Spironolactone improved congestion compared with placebo. Reducing congestion was independently associated with improved quality of life and outcomes and is a modifiable risk factor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diastolic heart failure; edema; physical examination; quality of life; spironolactone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31220936      PMCID: PMC6686863          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  44 in total

1.  Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  M H Drazner; J E Rame; L W Stevenson; D L Dries
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Diuretics.

Authors:  B D Rose
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Theophilus E Owan; David O Hodge; Regina M Herges; Steven J Jacobsen; Veronique L Roger; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Effect of aldosterone antagonism on exercise tolerance, Doppler diastolic function, and quality of life in older women with diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Kurt R Daniel; Gretchen Wells; Kathryn Stewart; Brian Moore; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  Congest Heart Fail       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

5.  Value of clinician assessment of hemodynamics in advanced heart failure: the ESCAPE trial.

Authors:  Mark H Drazner; Anne S Hellkamp; Carl V Leier; Monica R Shah; Leslie W Miller; Stuart D Russell; James B Young; Robert M Califf; Anju Nohria
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Results of the Randomized Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction trial (RAAM-PEF).

Authors:  Anita Deswal; Peter Richardson; Biykem Bozkurt; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Signs and symptoms in chronic heart failure: relevance of clinical trial results to point of care-data from Val-HeFT.

Authors:  Maylene Wong; Lidia Staszewsky; Elisa Carretta; Simona Barlera; Roberto Latini; Yann-Tong Chiang; Robert D Glazer; Jay N Cohn
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure.

Authors:  C P Green; C B Porter; D R Bresnahan; J A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The prognostic value of repeated measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Milos Kubánek; Kevin M Goode; Vera Lánská; Andrew L Clark; John G F Cleland
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 15.534

10.  Clinical assessment identifies hemodynamic profiles that predict outcomes in patients admitted with heart failure.

Authors:  Anju Nohria; Sui W Tsang; James C Fang; Eldrin F Lewis; John A Jarcho; Gilbert H Mudge; Lynne W Stevenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization, Clinical Outcomes, and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Valsartan in HFpEF.

Authors:  Muthiah Vaduganathan; Brian L Claggett; Akshay S Desai; Stefan D Anker; Sergio V Perrone; Stefan Janssens; Davor Milicic; Juan L Arango; Milton Packer; Victor C Shi; Martin P Lefkowitz; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Temporal Trends and Prognosis of Physical Examination Findings in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: The ARIC Study Community Surveillance.

Authors:  Abhigna Kolupoti; Marat Fudim; Ambarish Pandey; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Michael E Hall; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Robert J Mentz; Melissa C Caughey
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Association between Education Attainment and Guideline-Directed Medication Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Juan Long; Fanfang Zeng; Lili Wang; Honglei Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Cardiovascular Disease in the Post-COVID-19 Era - the Impending Tsunami?

Authors:  Usaid K Allahwala; A Robert Denniss; Sarah Zaman; Ravinay Bhindi
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.975

Review 6.  Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) and Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): The Diagnostic Value of Circulating MicroRNAs.

Authors:  Yei-Tsung Chen; Lee Lee Wong; Oi Wah Liew; Arthur Mark Richards
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Application of Diagnostic Algorithms for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction to the Community.

Authors:  Senthil Selvaraj; Peder L Myhre; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Brian L Claggett; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dalane W Kitzman; Barry A Borlaug; Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 12.035

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.