PURPOSE: While novel tools for segmentation of the mitral valve are often based on automatic image processing, they mostly require manual interaction by a proficient user. Those segmentations are essential for numerical support of mitral valve treatment using computational fluid dynamics, where the reconstructed geometry is incorporated into a simulation domain. To quantify the uncertainty and reliability of hemodynamic simulations, it is crucial to examine the influence of user-dependent variability in valve segmentation. METHODS: Previously, the inter-user variability of landmarks in mitral valve segmentation was investigated. Here, the inter-user variability of geometric parameters of the mitral valve, projected orifice area (OA) and projected annulus area (AA), is investigated for 10 mitral valve geometries, each segmented by three users. Furthermore, the propagation of those variations into numerically calculated hemodynamics, i.e., the blood flow velocity, was investigated. RESULTS: Among the three geometric valve parameters, AA was least user-dependent. Almost all deviations to the mean were below 10%. Larger variations were observed for OA. Variations observed for the numerically calculated hemodynamics were in the same order of magnitude as those of geometric parameters. No correlation between variation of geometric parameters and variation of calculated hemodynamic parameters was found. CONCLUSION: Errors introduced due to the user-dependency were of the same size as the variations of calculated hemodynamics. The variation was thereby of the same scale as deviations in clinical measurements of blood flow velocity using Doppler echocardiography. Since no correlation between geometric and hemodynamic uncertainty was found, further investigation of the complex relationship between anatomy, leaflet shape and flow is necessary.
PURPOSE: While novel tools for segmentation of the mitral valve are often based on automatic image processing, they mostly require manual interaction by a proficient user. Those segmentations are essential for numerical support of mitral valve treatment using computational fluid dynamics, where the reconstructed geometry is incorporated into a simulation domain. To quantify the uncertainty and reliability of hemodynamic simulations, it is crucial to examine the influence of user-dependent variability in valve segmentation. METHODS: Previously, the inter-user variability of landmarks in mitral valve segmentation was investigated. Here, the inter-user variability of geometric parameters of the mitral valve, projected orifice area (OA) and projected annulus area (AA), is investigated for 10 mitral valve geometries, each segmented by three users. Furthermore, the propagation of those variations into numerically calculated hemodynamics, i.e., the blood flow velocity, was investigated. RESULTS: Among the three geometric valve parameters, AA was least user-dependent. Almost all deviations to the mean were below 10%. Larger variations were observed for OA. Variations observed for the numerically calculated hemodynamics were in the same order of magnitude as those of geometric parameters. No correlation between variation of geometric parameters and variation of calculated hemodynamic parameters was found. CONCLUSION: Errors introduced due to the user-dependency were of the same size as the variations of calculated hemodynamics. The variation was thereby of the same scale as deviations in clinical measurements of blood flow velocity using Doppler echocardiography. Since no correlation between geometric and hemodynamic uncertainty was found, further investigation of the complex relationship between anatomy, leaflet shape and flow is necessary.
Authors: Steven F Bolling; Shuang Li; Sean M O'Brien; J Matthew Brennan; Richard L Prager; James S Gammie Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Mathias Neugebauer; Martin Glöckler; Leonid Goubergrits; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Anja Hennemuth Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Helmut Baumgartner; Volkmar Falk; Jeroen J Bax; Michele De Bonis; Christian Hamm; Per Johan Holm; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Emmanuel Lansac; Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Raphael Rosenhek; Johan Sjögren; Pilar Tornos Mas; Alec Vahanian; Thomas Walther; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jan Brüning; Florian Hellmeier; Pavlo Yevtushenko; Titus Kühne; Leonid Goubergrits Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Julien Magne; Mario Sénéchal; Patrick Mathieu; Jean G Dumesnil; François Dagenais; Philippe Pibarot Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lukas Obermeier; Katharina Vellguth; Adriano Schlief; Lennart Tautz; Jan Bruening; Christoph Knosalla; Titus Kuehne; Natalia Solowjowa; Leonid Goubergrits Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-22
Authors: Katharina Vellguth; Fabian Barbieri; Markus Reinthaler; Mario Kasner; Ulf Landmesser; Titus Kuehne; Anja Hennemuth; Lars Walczak; Leonid Goubergrits Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-08-24