| Literature DB >> 31217803 |
Hidetoshi Watari1, Yutaka Shimada1, Mie Matsui2, Chihiro Tohda3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We previously reported that the administration of traditional Japanese medicines, kihito (Gui-Pi-Tang in Chinese) and kamikihito (Jia-Wei-Gui-Pi-Tang in Chinese), to Alzheimer's disease (AD) model mice improved memory impairment. There are a few reports that show kihito and kamikihito have a beneficial effect on the cognitive function of AD patients in clinical studies. However, these studies are not comparative and are retrospective studies; thus, more evidence is needed. Therefore, we conducted an open-label, crossover designed clinical trial to investigate the effect of kihito on cognitive function of AD patients.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31217803 PMCID: PMC6537006 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4086749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Overview of the study design. MMSE, Mini-Mental State Evaluation; ChEI, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor.
Baseline characteristic of the sample.
| Values | |
|---|---|
| Subject (Men/Women) | 10 (4/6) |
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 71.8 ± 6.93 (58-82) |
| Race | Asian |
| MMSE-J (mean ± SD) | 20.5 ± 3.74 |
| RBANS-J total (mean ± SD) | 54.9 ± 22.2 |
SD: standard deviation.
Figure 2Effect of kihito extract on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease patients based on Japanese Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) scores. Changed values of total MMSE-J scores during the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) alone treatment period and kihito intake period are shown. The score significantly increased during the kihito intake period compared with the ChEI alone treatment period (n = 10, p = 0.0039, paired t-test).
Figure 3Effect of kihito extract on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease patients based on Japanese Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS-J) test scores. Changed values of total RBANS-J scores during the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) alone treatment period and kihito intake period are shown. There were no significant changes (n = 10, p = 0.6268, paired t-test).
Changes in Japanese Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS-J) scores between acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) alone treatment period and kihito intake period.
| Cognitive Domain | ChEI alone | ChEI + kihito | Mean Difference | SD Difference | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 16 weeks | Baseline | 16 weeks | |||||
| MMSE-J | 21 ± 4.42 | 19.2 ± 4.59 | 19.7 ± 4.24 | 20.2 ± 4.96 | 2.3 | 1.888 | 0.9491 to 3.651 | 0.0039 |
|
| ||||||||
| RBANS | ||||||||
| Total score | 54.8 ± 26.0 | 52.1 ± 25.7 | 54.6 ± 25.3 | 54.3 ± 27.8 | 2.4 | 15.07 | -8.386 to 13.19 | 0.6268 |
| Immediate memory | 61.7 ± 12.3 | 63.4 ± 15.4 | 67.8 ± 18.0 | 62.5 ± 13.4 | -7.0 | 20.40 | -7.609 to 21.61 | 0.3066 |
| Visuospatial/Constructional | 83.9 ± 34.5 | 80.3 ± 40.4 | 79.4 ± 39.1 | 74.9 ± 40.3 | -0.9 | 24.98 | -16.97 to 18.77 | 0.9000 |
| Language | 75.4 ± 23.1 | 66.1 ± 22.2 | 72.1 ± 20.5 | 77.4 ± 25.0 | 14.6 | 23.05 | -1.892 to 31.09 | 0.0763 |
| Attention | 76.4 ± 19.1 | 75.7 ± 16.1 | 76.8 ± 17.3 | 76.5 ± 21.3 | 0.4 | 13.22 | -9.061 to 9.861 | 0.9259 |
| Delayed memory | 50.7 ± 15.4 | 54.7 ± 12.4 | 52.0 ± 13.8 | 52.9 ± 14.1 | -3.1 | 21.45 | -18.45 to 12.25 | 0.6586 |
SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
∗ p < 0.05, two-tailed paired t-test.
Changes in Japanese Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) subtest scores between acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) alone treatment period and kihito intake period.
| Cognitive Domain | ChEI alone | ChEI + kihito | Mean Difference | SD Difference | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 16 weeks | Baseline | 16 weeks | |||||
| Temporal orientation | 2.8 ± 1.87 | 2.1 ± 1.44 | 2.0 ± 1.49 | 2.8 ± 1.39 | 1.5 | 1.715 | 0.2726 to 2.727 | 0.0220 |
| Spatial orientation | 3.3 ± 0.94 | 2.8 ± 1.31 | 3.0 ± 1.33 | 3.2 ± 1.13 | 0.7 | 1.337 | -0.2567 to 1.657 | 0.1323 |
| Memory registration | 3.0 ± 0 | 2.9 ± 0.31 | 2.9 ± 0.31 | 2.9 ± 0.31 | 0.1 | 0.316 | -0.1262 to 0.3262 | 0.3434 |
| Attention | 2.4 ± 1.64 | 2.0 ± 1.94 | 2.5 ± 1.77 | 2.2 ± 1.81 | 0.1 | 2.282 | -1.533 to 1.733 | 0.8929 |
| Delayed memory recall | 1.3 ± 1.15 | 1.3 ± 1.05 | 1.2 ± 0.91 | 1.0 ± 1.05 | -0.2 | 1.229 | -1.079 to 0.6793 | 0.6193 |
| Naming | 2.0 ± 0 | 2.0 ± 0 | 2.0 ± 0 | 2.0 ± 0 | no change | |||
| Phrase repetition | 0.8 ± 0.42 | 0.8 ± 0.42 | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.0 | 0.666 | -0.4769 to 0.4769 | 1.00 |
| Comprehension | 2.9 ± 0.31 | 3.0 ± 0 | 3.0 ± 0 | 3.0 ± 0 | -0.1 | 0.316 | -0.3262 to 0.1262 | 0.3434 |
| Reading | 0.9 ± 0.31 | 1.0 ± 0 | 1.0 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0.31 | -0.2 | 0.632 | -0.6524 to 0.2524 | 0.3434 |
| Writing | 0.9 ± 0.31 | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.8 ± 0.42 | 0.3 | 0.483 | -0.04553 to 0.6455 | 0.0811 |
| Visuo‐constructional ability | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.6 ± 0.51 | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.7 ± 0.48 | 0.1 | 0.737 | -0.4278 to 0.6278 | 0.6783 |
SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
∗ p < 0.05, two-tailed paired t-test.