Literature DB >> 29365294

Trial of Solanezumab for Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease.

Lawrence S Honig1, Bruno Vellas1, Michael Woodward1, Mercè Boada1, Roger Bullock1, Michael Borrie1, Klaus Hager1, Niels Andreasen1, Elio Scarpini1, Hong Liu-Seifert1, Michael Case1, Robert A Dean1, Ann Hake1, Karen Sundell1, Vicki Poole Hoffmann1, Christopher Carlson1, Rashna Khanna1, Mark Mintun1, Ronald DeMattos1, Katherine J Selzler1, Eric Siemers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease is characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The humanized monoclonal antibody solanezumab was designed to increase the clearance from the brain of soluble Aβ, peptides that may lead to toxic effects in the synapses and precede the deposition of fibrillary amyloid.
METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving patients with mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 20 to 26 (on a scale from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognition) and with amyloid deposition shown by means of florbetapir positron-emission tomography or Aβ1-42 measurements in cerebrospinal fluid. Patients were randomly assigned to receive solanezumab at a dose of 400 mg or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 76 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to week 80 in the score on the 14-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog14; scores range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment).
RESULTS: A total of 2129 patients were enrolled, of whom 1057 were assigned to receive solanezumab and 1072 to receive placebo. The mean change from baseline in the ADAS-cog14 score was 6.65 in the solanezumab group and 7.44 in the placebo group, with no significant between-group difference at week 80 (difference, -0.80; 95% confidence interval, -1.73 to 0.14; P=0.10). As a result of the failure to reach significance with regard to the primary outcome in the prespecified hierarchical analysis, the secondary outcomes were considered to be descriptive and are reported without significance testing. The change from baseline in the MMSE score was -3.17 in the solanezumab group and -3.66 in the placebo group. Adverse cerebral edema or effusion lesions that were observed on magnetic resonance imaging after randomization occurred in 1 patient in the solanezumab group and in 2 in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Solanezumab at a dose of 400 mg administered every 4 weeks in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease did not significantly affect cognitive decline. (Funded by Eli Lilly; EXPEDITION3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01900665 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29365294     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  255 in total

1.  Simulating the outcome of amyloid treatments in Alzheimer's disease from imaging and clinical data.

Authors:  Clément Abi Nader; Nicholas Ayache; Giovanni B Frisoni; Philippe Robert; Marco Lorenzi
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 2.  Clinical Research on Alzheimer's Disease: Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Bin-Lu Sun; Wei-Wei Li; Chi Zhu; Wang-Sheng Jin; Fan Zeng; Yu-Hui Liu; Xian-Le Bu; Jie Zhu; Xiu-Qing Yao; Yan-Jiang Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Machine Learning Predictive Models Can Improve Efficacy of Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Ali Ezzati; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 4.  Revisiting protein aggregation as pathogenic in sporadic Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Joaquin A Vizcarra; Luca Marsili; Anthony E Lang; David K Simon; Aristide Merola; Keith A Josephs; Alfonso Fasano; Francesca Morgante; Rodolfo Savica; J Timothy Greenamyre; Franca Cambi; Tritia R Yamasaki; Caroline M Tanner; Ziv Gan-Or; Irene Litvan; Ignacio F Mata; Cyrus P Zabetian; Patrik Brundin; Hubert H Fernandez; David G Standaert; Marcelo A Kauffman; Michael A Schwarzschild; S Pablo Sardi; Todd Sherer; George Perry; James B Leverenz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Insights into Computational Drug Repurposing for Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Manish D Paranjpe; Alice Taubes; Marina Sirota
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 14.819

6.  Development of a quality of life questionnaire for nursing home residents in mainland China.

Authors:  Dongjuan Xu; Jie Gao; Liqin Chen; Huanyu Mou; Xiaorong Wang; Jiying Ling; Kefang Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  In vitro models of molecular and nano-particle transport across the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Cynthia Hajal; Marco Campisi; Clara Mattu; Valeria Chiono; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Transcranial optical imaging reveals a pathway for optimizing the delivery of immunotherapeutics to the brain.

Authors:  Benjamin A Plog; Humberto Mestre; Genaro E Olveda; Amanda M Sweeney; H Mark Kenney; Alexander Cove; Kosha Y Dholakia; Jeffrey Tithof; Thomas D Nevins; Iben Lundgaard; Ting Du; Douglas H Kelley; Maiken Nedergaard
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-10-18

Review 9.  Treating Alzheimer's disease by targeting iron.

Authors:  Sara Nikseresht; Ashley I Bush; Scott Ayton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Invasive and non-invasive therapies for Alzheimer's disease and other amyloidosis.

Authors:  Gaurav Pandey; Vibin Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.