Literature DB >> 31216065

Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial).

B K Bednarski1, T P Nickerson1, Y N You1, C A Messick1, B Speer2, V Gottumukkala2, M Manandhar1, M Weldon1, E M Dean1, W Qiao3, X Wang3, G J Chang1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have improved postoperative recovery and shortened length of hospital stay (LOS). Telemedicine technology has potential to improve outcomes and patient experience further. This study was designed to determine whether the combination of MIS, ERP and a structured telemedicine programme (TeleRecovery) could shorten total 30-day LOS by 50 per cent.
METHODS: This was a phase II prospective RCT at a large academic medical centre. Eligible patients aged 18-80 years undergoing minimally invasive colorectal resection using an ERP were randomized after surgery. The experimental arm (RecoverMI) included accelerated discharge on postoperative day (POD) 1 with or without evidence of bowel function and a televideoconference on POD 2. The control arm was standard postoperative care. The primary endpoint was total 30-day LOS (postoperative stay plus readmission/emergency department/observation days). Secondary endpoints included patient-reported outcomes measured by EQ-5D-5L™, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and a satisfaction questionnaire.
RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized after robotic (21 patients) or laparoscopic (9) colectomy, including 14 patients in the RecoverMI arm. Median 30-day total LOS was 28·3 (i.q.r. 23·7-43·6) h in the RecoverMI arm and 51·5 (43·8-67·0) h in the control arm (P = 0·041). There were no differences in severe adverse events or EQ-5D-5L™ score between the study arms. The BPI revealed low pain scores regardless of treatment arm. Satisfaction was high in both arms.
CONCLUSION: In patients having surgery for colorectal neoplasms, the trimodal combination of MIS, ERP and TeleRecovery can reduce 30-day LOS while preserving patients' quality of life and satisfaction. Registration number: NCT02613728 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov).
© 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31216065      PMCID: PMC7938853          DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  20 in total

1.  Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Maria C De Leon; Thomas Kohlmann; David Cella; Sarah Rosenbloom
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Bridging the transition from hospital to home: effects of the VITAL telehealth program on recovery for CABG surgery patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  Lisa Keeping-Burke; Margaret Purden; Nancy Frasure-Smith; Sylvie Cossette; Frank McCarthy; Rhonda Amsel
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer.

Authors:  George J Chang; Andreas M Kaiser; Steven Mills; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J K Lovely; P M Maxson; A K Jacob; R R Cima; T T Horlocker; J R Hebl; W S Harmsen; M Huebner; D W Larson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Olle Ljungqvist; Michael Scott; Kenneth C Fearon
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Outpatient virtual clinical encounters after complex surgery for cancer: a prospective pilot study of "TeleDischarge".

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Rebecca Slack; Morgan Bruno; Jermaine McMillan; Jason B Fleming; Jeffrey E Lee; Brian Bednarski; John Papadopoulos; Surena F Matin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  B F Levy; M J P Scott; W J Fawcett; T A Rockall
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program.

Authors:  Kimberly Hwa; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Accelerated enhanced Recovery following Minimally Invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI): a study protocol for a novel randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brandee A Price; Brian K Bednarski; Y Nancy You; Meryna Manandhar; E Michelle Dean; Zeinab M Alawadi; B Bryce Speer; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Marla Weldon; Robert L Massey; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; George J Chang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  8 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Directed Surgical Decision Making for Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT).

Authors:  Oliver Peacock; Naveen Manisundaram; Sandra R Dibrito; Youngwan Kim; Chung-Yuan Hu; Brian K Bednarski; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Nir Stanietzky; Raghunandan Vikram; Harmeet Kaur; Melissa W Taggart; Arvind Dasari; Emma B Holliday; Y Nancy You; George J Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 13.787

2.  Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Letícia Flores Trindade; Julia Estela Willrich Boell; Elisiane Lorenzini; Wilson Cañon Montañez; Michelle Malkiewiez; Edith Pituskin; Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Long-Hai He; Bo Yang; Xiao-Qin Su; Yue Zhou; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 1.534

Review 4.  Recommendations for the Design and Delivery of Transitions-Focused Digital Health Interventions: Rapid Review.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Terence Tang; Carolyn Steele Gray; Kristina Kokorelias; Rachel Thombs; Donna Plett; Matthew Heffernan; Carlotta M Jarach; Alana Armas; Susan Law; Heather V Cunningham; Jason Xin Nie; Moriah E Ellen; Kednapa Thavorn; Michelle LA Nelson
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-05-19

5.  Postoperative complications after robotic resection of colorectal cancer: An analysis based on 5-year experience at a large-scale center.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Huang; Zhen Zhou; Hao-Ran Shi; Tai-Yuan Li; Shan-Ping Ye
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  The remarkably frequent use of EQ-5D in non-economic research.

Authors:  Aimin Wang; Kim Rand; Zhihao Yang; Richard Brooks; Jan Busschbach
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-30

7.  iColon, a patient-focused mobile application for perioperative care in colorectal surgery: an observational, real-world study protocol.

Authors:  Elisa Bertocchi; Giuliano Barugola; Irene Gentile; Teresa Zuppini; Massimo Zamperini; Massimo Guerriero; Renato Avesani; Silvia Bonadiman; Chiara Anselmi; Giacomo Ruffo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The COVID-19 pandemic: considerations for resuming normal colorectal services.

Authors:  G Pellino; C J Vaizey; Y Maeda
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.