Literature DB >> 31216064

Meta-analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long-course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer.

É J Ryan1,2, D P O'Sullivan1, M E Kelly3,2, A Z Syed1, P C Neary1,4, P R O'Connell3,2, D O Kavanagh1,4, D C Winter3,2, J M O'Riordan1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Surgery is conventionally performed approximately 6-8 weeks after nCRT. This study aimed to determine the effect on outcomes of extending this interval.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed for studies reporting oncological results that compared the classical interval (less than 8 weeks) from the end of nCRT to TME with a minimum 8-week interval in patients with LARC. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, local recurrence and distant metastasis rates, R0 resection rates, completeness of TME, margin positivity, sphincter preservation, stoma formation, anastomotic leak and other complications. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method.
RESULTS: Twenty-six publications, including four RCTs, with 25 445 patients were identified. A minimum 8-week interval was associated with increased odds of pCR (odds ratio (OR) 1·41, 95 per cent c.i. 1·30 to 1·52; P < 0·001) and tumour downstaging (OR 1·18, 1·05 to 1·32; P = 0·004). R0 resection rates, TME completeness, lymph node yield, sphincter preservation, stoma formation and complication rates were similar between the two groups. The increased rate of pCR translated to reduced distant metastasis (OR 0·71, 0·54 to 0·93; P = 0·01) and overall recurrence (OR 0·76, 0·58 to 0·98; P = 0·04), but not local recurrence (OR 0·83, 0·49 to 1·42; P = 0·50).
CONCLUSION: A minimum 8-week interval from the end of nCRT to TME increases pCR and downstaging rates, and improves recurrence-free survival without compromising surgical morbidity.
© 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31216064     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

1.  The Number of Harvested LNs Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Lymph Node Metastasis-negative Patients Who Received Curative Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Yosuke Atsumi; Shinnosuke Kawahara; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Ayako Tamagawa; Yukio Maezawa; Kazuki Kano; Masaaki Murakawa; Keisuke Kazama; Masakatsu Numata; Takashi Oshima; Norio Yukawa; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  The Lymph Node Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Surgery.

Authors:  Norio Yukawa; Toru Aoyama; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Ayako Tamagawa; Yosuke Atsumi; Shinnosuke Kawahara; Yukio Maezawa; Kazuki Kano; Masaaki Murakawa; Keisuke Kazama; Masakatsu Numata; Takashi Oshima; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Effect of delaying surgery by more than 10 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Cristina Piva; Luca Panier Suffat; Edoardo T F Petrucci; Giovanna Manuguerra; Federico Vittone; Domenico Cante; Silvia Ferrario; Marina Paolini; Lorenzo Radici; Giorgio Vellani; Maria R La Porta
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 4.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as a Strategy in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Catherine R Hanna; Séan M O'Cathail; Janet Graham; Richard Adams; Campbell S D Roxburgh
Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Machine learning for predicting pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Huang; Ming-Yii Huang; Ching-Wen Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Wei-Chih Su; Wei-Chiao Chang; Jaw-Yuan Wang; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Intensive Care Resource Utilization After Colon Cancer Surgery: a Practical Guide to the Selection of Patients During COVID-19.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Maria Abou-Khalil; Ebram Salama; Daniel Marinescu; Allison Pang; Nancy Morin; Sebastian Demyttenaere; A Sender Liberman; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs. Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Maria C Riesco-Martinez; Carlos Fernandez-Martos; Cristina Gravalos-Castro; Paula Espinosa-Olarte; Anna La Salvia; Luis Robles-Diaz; Andrea Modrego-Sanchez; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Elevated and Normalized Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jianyuan Song; Zhuhong Chen; Daxin Huang; Benhua Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jianguo Yang; Yajun Luo; Tingting Tian; Peng Dong; Zhongxue Fu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Prevalence of nodal involvement in rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  H E Haak; G L Beets; K Peeters; P J Nelemans; V Valentini; C Rödel; L Kuo; F A Calvo; J Garcia-Aguilar; R Glynne-Jones; S Pucciarelli; J Suarez; G Theodoropoulos; S Biondo; D M J Lambregts; R G H Beets-Tan; M Maas
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 11.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.