Literature DB >> 31215339

Complex Regulation of Mitochondrial Function During Cardiac Development.

Qiancong Zhao1,2, Qianchuang Sun3,2, Lufang Zhou4, Kexiang Liu1, Kai Jiao2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiogenesis; heart defects, congenital; heart development; mitochondria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31215339      PMCID: PMC6662350          DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


× No keyword cloud information.
Abnormal heart development is a key feature contributing to the cardiac defects of congenital heart diseases, which are the most common birth defects in humans, occurring in 1% to 5% of newborns.1, 2, 3, 4 Revealing the cellular, genetic, and molecular mechanisms that govern normal heart development will provide key information necessary for the development of effective clinical applications to prevent or treat congenital heart diseases. The heart is the first organ formed in mammals and is essential for embryo survival.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Cardiogenesis involves a series of complicated and precisely controlled processes (Figure 1). During gastrulation in mice, the cardiac progenitor cells enter the primitive streak and assimilate to constitute the primary heart field in the anterior splanchnic mesoderm at embryonic day 6.5 (E6.5). Cardiogenic mesodermal cells then coalesce to form a cardiac crescent at E7.5.11, 12 These cells move toward the ventral midline and form the linear heart tube at E8.0. At this stage, another group of cardiac precursor cells from the second heart field join the primitive heart tube from the pharyngeal mesoderm and dorsal mesocardium.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Shortly thereafter, the linear heart undergoes rightward looping to bring the future inflow chambers (atria) to the top of the outflow chambers (ventricles). At E9.5, a heart with 4 primordial chambers is formed, and cardiac precursor cells from the second heart field continue to join the hearts from both arterial and venous poles until E11.5.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Cells derived from the primary heart field give rise to the left ventricle and parts of the atria, whereas cells derived from the second heart field generate the right ventricle, outflow tract (OFT) and main parts of the atria.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 From E11.5 to E18.5, embryonic hearts undergo complicated maturation and remodeling processes including myocardial wall trabeculation and compaction, septation between chambers, septation of the OFT, valvulogenesis, formation of coronary vessels, and formation of the conduction system. In mice, nearly all cardiomyocytes withdraw from the cell cycle and undergo maturation during the first 2 weeks after birth.17, 18, 19 In contrast to the hyperplastic growth observed in embryos, postnatal cardiac growth primarily relies on hypertrophic growth.17, 18, 19 The major processes of cardiogenesis are highly conserved between rodent and human; therefore, mice and rats serve as power model systems to study human heart development.20
Figure 1

Cardiogenesis in mice. AV indicates atrioventricular; DA, ductus arteriosus; E, embryonic day; IFT, inflow tract; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; OFT, outflow tract; PHF, primary heart field; PT, pulmonary trunk; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; SHF, second heart field.

Cardiogenesis in mice. AV indicates atrioventricular; DA, ductus arteriosus; E, embryonic day; IFT, inflow tract; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; OFT, outflow tract; PHF, primary heart field; PT, pulmonary trunk; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; SHF, second heart field. Accumulated evidence suggests that mitochondria are critical for embryonic heart development in mammals, in addition to their well‐established roles in postnatal hearts. Impaired mitochondrial activities in embryonic hearts may lead to severe cardiomyopathy and embryonic/neonatal lethality in animal models and human patients.21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 This review will summarize recent knowledge regarding the regulatory roles of mitochondria during embryonic and early postnatal heart development in mammals.

Mitochondrial Structure and Function

Mitochondria arose ≈2 billion years ago through engulfment of α‐proteobacteria by precursors of modern eukaryotic cells and have evolved to become a vital organelle with multiple activities in eukaryotes.34, 35, 36, 37, 38 Mitochondria are composed of 2 lipid bilayer membranes (ie, the relatively permeable outer membrane and the much less permeable, highly folded inner membrane) and 2 aqueous spaces (ie, the intermembrane space and the matrix)39, 40 (Figure 2). The outer membrane serves as the boundary between the cytoplasm and mitochondria. It contains multiple receptors to mediate communication between mitochondria and other organelles.41, 42 The inner membrane is folded into cristae protruding into the matrix and thus has a much larger surface area than the outer membrane.38 The oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes, complexes I to V, are located on the inner membrane and mediate electron transportation to generate ATP.43, 44 The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) contains both inner and outer membrane components, and its exact biomolecular configuration has not been finally determined.45 Under normal conditions, this pore is closed to maintain proper membrane integrity. When open, it allows passage of molecules <1.5 kDa.46 The intermembrane space between the inner and outer membranes contains cytochrome c, which is essential for transporting electrons and inducing apoptosis.47, 48 The mitochondrial matrix is the space inside the inner membrane. It contains the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), ribosomes, enzymes, and ions and is the location of the tricarboxylic acid cycle.49, 50
Figure 2

Structure of mitochondria.

Structure of mitochondria. At the cellular level, mitochondria form dynamic networks with morphologies varying with cell types,51 for example, a highly ordered lattice in adult cardiac cells and a more irregular tubular arrangement in neonatal cardiomyocytes.52, 53, 54 Functionally, mitochondria play a pivotal role in regulating cellular functions (eg, energy production) and signaling molecules (eg, reactive oxygen species [ROS] and Ca2+).55, 56 In adult cardiomyocytes, mitochondria are the major cellular powerhouse and produce >95% of the cell's energy in the form of ATP. Once the substrates (eg, glucose and fatty acids) enter the cell, they are sequentially oxidized to produce acetyl coenzyme A, which drives the tricarboxylic acid cycle to produce the reducing equivalents NADH (Nicotinamide Adenine DinucleotideHydrogen) and FADH2 (Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide‐2 Hydrogen) in the mitochondrial matrix. NADH and FADH2 are oxidized by NADH dehydrogenase (complex I) and succinate dehydrogenase (complex II), respectively, in the inner membrane, driving the electron transport chain (ETC; complex I–IV) to establish the proton‐motive force. In the last step of OXPHOS, the energy derived from the proton‐motive force is utilized by F1FO ATP synthase (complex V) to convert ADP and inorganic phosphate to ATP. In addition to energy production, mitochondria are the major site of ROS production.57, 58, 59, 60 In vitro studies have shown that up to 2% of electrons flowing through the ETC are partially reduced to form superoxide anion (),61 likely at complexes I, II, and III.57, 58 Superoxide is rapidly dismutated by superoxide dismutase (eg, MnSOD (manganese superoxide dismutase) and CuZnSOD (copper‐zinc superoxide dismutase)) to form H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide), which is further reduced to H2O by various antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and peroxiredoxins.62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 As natural byproducts of oxygen metabolism, ROS signaling molecules regulate a variety of oxygen‐sensing machineries, including gene expression.68, 69, 70 However, excessive ROSs are toxic and can oxidize large molecules such as proteins, DNA, and lipids, which can lead to oxidative damage.57, 64, 71 In addition, oxidative stress can promote the pathological opening of the mPTP, causing mitochondrial swelling, membrane rupture, and cell death.72, 73, 74, 75 ROS overload also can deplete the intracellular redox pool,76 impairing cellular Ca2+ handling,77 ion channel activity, and ROS‐mediated redox signaling pathways.78, 79, 80, 81 In cardiomyocytes, Ca2+ homeostasis is maintained by various Ca2+ channels and exchangers in the sarcolemma and subcellular membranes, including the L‐type Ca2+ channel, the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, RyR (ryanodine receptor), and SERCA (sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase). Recent studies suggest that Ca2+ dynamics also may be shaped by mitochondria,82, 83, 84 either directly by inner membrane Ca2+ transport or indirectly by ROS‐mediated signaling pathways. The mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter is the primary route for Ca2+ entry into the mitochondrial matrix,85 and RyR1 has been proposed as an alternative Ca2+ uptake mechanism.86 Evidence suggests that mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake channels are located at the proximate side of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release sites (ie, RyRs),87, 88 facilitating rapid mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and ATP production in response to increased workload. The extrusion of Ca2+ from the mitochondria is mediated by a mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger,89 which is much slower compared with the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter. The transient mPTP opening also may be associated with mitochondrial Ca2+ release.90 Under pathological conditions, mitochondria can affect Ca2+ handling by releasing ROS close to redox‐sensitive ion transporters involved in cytoplasmic Ca2+ handling, such as the L‐type Ca2+ channel,91 RyRs,80, 92 and SERCA.93 Thus, mitochondria play a multifactorial role in regulating Ca2+ homeostasis and signaling in cardiomyocytes.94 Mitochondria in mature cardiomyocytes are different from those found in other tissue and cell types. Mitochondria are significantly more abundant in hearts than in skeletal muscle, brain, kidney, and liver.95 Consistent with these observations, the ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA in hearts is also significantly higher than in other tissues.96 Transmission electron microscopy reveals that mitochondria in striated muscles (skeletal and cardiac muscles) appear to be located within membranous compartments along the myofiber.95 In contrast, mitochondria are more perinuclear in liver cells and more dispersed throughout the cytosol in brain. In addition to the differences in abundance and morphology, mitochondria from different tissues can utilize different fuel to generate ATP. For example, cardiac mitochondria primarily use fatty acid as fuel, whereas most other organs use glucose as the major energy substrate.96

Maturation of Cardiac Mitochondria in Mammalian Embryos

In this section we summarize the process of mitochondrial maturation at different stages of mammalian heart development. Little is known regarding mitochondria in cardiac precursor cells. Between E6.5 and E8.5 in mice, the whole embryo is under low‐oxygen conditions; therefore, aerobic glycolysis presumably serves as the primary source of ATP for cardiac precursor cells.97, 98 At E8.5 in mouse embryos or E10 in rat embryos, some mitochondria can be observed in cardiomyocytes through transmission electron microscopy; however, these mitochondria are considered “very immature” (class 1; Figure 3).24, 32, 99 They contain few cristae and no expanded matrix. At E9.5 in mice and E11 in rats, the number of mitochondria in cardiomyocytes is increased and cristae can be clearly observed within mitochondria.24, 32, 99 At this stage most mitochondria are still Class 1. At E10.5 in mice and E12 in rats, the number of cristae in cardiac mitochondria is increased compared with earlier stages. Some mitochondria contain tubular cristae, which form connections to the periphery. The matrix in these mitochondria is slightly expanded. This type of mitochondria is considered “immature” (class 2).24, 32, 99 In class 1 and 2 mitochondria, ETC activity and ATP generation are not coupled, although OXPHOS complexes can be detected in the inner membrane of mitochondria.24, 32, 99 Cardiomyocytes primarily acquire ATP through anaerobic glycolysis (Figure 4). At E11.5 in mouse embryonic hearts, OXPHOS complexes begin to assemble into highly efficient respirasomes (supercomplexes) and ETC activity and ATP generation are coupled.100 Initiation of ETC activity coincides with the activation of complex I,100 suggesting that complex I activation is critical for initiation of electron transportation along the OXPHOS complexes. Unfortunately, no ultrastructural examination of mitochondria at this stage has been published. In rodent hearts corresponding to E12.5 and E13.5 of mouse embryos, most cardiac mitochondria become “almost mature” (class 3), with structures resembling the mature mitochondria (class 4) observed in postnatal and adult heart tissues.32, 99 Class 3 mitochondria contain many tubular cristae that are connected with the periphery.32, 99 Their matrices are highly compacted with occasional “voids” observed in transmission electron microscopy images. More respirasomes can be observed on the inner membranes of mitochondria. By E13.5 the mitochondria are functionally matured and their mPTPs are closed.32, 99 Electron transportation and OXPHOS activities in E13.5 cardiac mitochondria are indistinguishable from those in adult mitochondria.32, 99 At this stage, embryonic cardiomyocytes acquire ATP through both anaerobic glycolysis and OXPHOS.101, 102 By the end of gestation in prenatal and newborn hearts, ≈44% of total ATP is generated through anaerobic glycolysis; production of the remaining ATP relies on OXPHOS (Figure 4).101, 103
Figure 3

Maturation of mitochondria during mouse heart development. E indicates, embryonic day.

Figure 4

Embryonic and fetal/neonatal metabolic shift.101 E indicates embryonic day; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation.

Maturation of mitochondria during mouse heart development. E indicates, embryonic day. Embryonic and fetal/neonatal metabolic shift.101 E indicates embryonic day; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation. It is a common misconception that aerobic metabolism in hearts becomes critical only after birth. The metabolic shift from anaerobic glycolysis to aerobic metabolism already occurs during the mid‐ to late‐gestation stages in mammalian hearts. By the end of gestation, the generation of >50% of ATP relies on OXPHOS in prenatal hearts (Figure 4).101, 103 This embryonic metabolic shift, originally proposed by Baker and Ebert,21 can serve at least 2 major purposes. First, the normal assembly of respiratory complexes in embryonic hearts is necessary to prepare hearts to undergo the fetal to neonatal metabolic shift after birth. Second, OXPHOS provides >50% of ATP in fetal hearts to support their pumping activity.21, 98, 101, 104 Defective OXPHOS in embryonic hearts leads to severe heart defects and embryonic or neonatal lethality in mouse models and human patients.21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 This “embryonic” metabolic shift remains poorly studied in the literature.

Mitochondrial Biogenic Surge During the Fetal/Neonatal Metabolic Shift and Potential Roles of Mitochondria in Regulating Neonatal Cardiomyocyte Maturation

After birth, the cardiac environment shifts from hypoxia in embryos (10–30 mm Hg oxygen) to normoxia (80–100 mm Hg oxygen).98, 105 Neonatal hearts undergo the well‐defined fetal/neonatal metabolic shift through which the primary source of ATP generation transitions from glycolysis to fatty acid β‐oxidation.98, 101, 105 By postnatal day 21 (P21), nearly 80% of ATP is generated through fatty acid β‐oxidation in cardiomyocytes (Figure 4).98, 101 Compared with glycolysis, fatty acid β‐oxidation is much more efficient with respect to ATP generation; therefore, the fetal/neonatal metabolic shift is essential for cardiomyocytes to fulfill the increased cardiac workload during this period.98, 101 Accompanying this metabolic shift, the mitochondrial biogenic surge occurs in cardiomyocytes soon after birth.106 For example, the mtDNA copy number increases by ≈1.5‐fold at P1 and by ≈5.0‐fold at P21 compared with fetal hearts in rats.107 The essential functions of mitochondria in neonatal and infant hearts can be clearly demonstrated through studies of Tfam (transcription factor A, mitochondrial) in mice. TFAM is a DNA‐binding protein that is required for replication and transcription of the mitochondrial genome.108, 109, 110 Inactivation of Tfam in muscle cells at the perinatal stage uses MCK (muscle creatine kinase)–Cre reduced expression of TFAM in cardiac and skeletal muscle cells at E18.5, as determined from Western analysis.111 The steady‐state level of mitochondrial transcripts in these mutant hearts between P20 and P30 was ≈30% of the control level, suggesting that the function of TFAM was efficiently inactivated at this stage.111 Deletion of Tfam by MCK‐Cre caused deficiency in the respiratory chain, blockage of atrioventricular heart conduction, dilated cardiomyopathy, and animal lethality between P15 and P35.111 Knocking out Tfam using another muscle Cre line, MCK‐Nls‐Cre, reduced mtDNA to ≈25% of the control level at P14 and allowed mutant animals to survive 10 to 12 weeks after birth.112 In these mutant hearts, respiration was severely impaired and a fetal gene expression program was activated between 4 and 9 weeks after birth.112 Reactivation of the fetal gene expression program is a well‐recognized phenotype of cardiac diseases.113, 114 The studies described, in which Tfam was deleted, clearly show that mitochondria are required for normal cardiac postnatal development. Whether cardiomyocyte maturation was impaired in these mutant mice was not reported.111, 112 A classical study115 published a decade ago strongly supported the idea that mitochondrial biogenesis and the perinatal biogenic surge are required for postnatal cardiomyocyte maturation. PGC‐1α (PPARG [peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ] coactivator 1α; encoded by Ppargc1a [PPARG coactivator 1α]) and its homolog PGC‐1β (encoded by Ppargc1b) play a central role in regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and maturation.24, 115, 116, 117 To understand the role of Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b during heart development, Ppargc1b was specifically inactivated in fetal hearts using Myh6 (Myosin heavy chain 6)‐Cre on the Ppargc1a‐deficient (Ppargc1a ) background (Ppargc1a ;Ppargc1b ;Myh6‐Cre).115 At P0.5, expression of Ppargc1b mRNA in Ppargc1a ;Ppargc1b ;Myh6 mice was reduced to <5% of the control level.115 Double inactivation of Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b in mouse fetal hearts decreased mitochondrial volume density and arrested mitochondrial biogenesis and maturation at the perinatal stage.115 Double‐knockout (DKO) animals survived to P0 and died during the first week after birth because of heart failure. Heart size and activity in DKO animals was significantly decreased compared with controls. Molecular examination showed that the expression of fetal cardiac genes (including Nppa (natriuretic peptide A) and Nppb (natriuretic peptide B)) remained high, whereas the expression of the adult sarcomeric isoform, Myh6, was reduced within neonatal DKO hearts.115 These data collectively suggest that blocking mitochondrial biogenesis at the perinatal stage impairs cardiomyocyte maturation. The conclusion from the study described above is challenged by a recent study in which Tfam was specifically inactivated in neonatal hearts using an adeno‐associated viral system, AAV9‐cTnt‐Cre (Cre driven by the cardiac Troponin T promoter in the AAV9 vector).31 Mice at P0 were treated with either high‐ or low‐dose AAV9‐cTnt‐Cre virus, resulting in ≈55% and ≈30% Cre‐mediated recombination in cardiomyocytes, respectively. Four weeks after injection with low‐dose AAV9‐cTnt‐Cre, expression of TFAM was undetectable in isolated cardiomyocytes.31 Mutant mice displayed mitochondrial dysfunction leading to dilated cardiomyopathy.31 However, cardiomyocyte maturation did not appear to be impaired, as judged from the development of transverse tubules, sarcomere organization, physiological hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes, and switching of sarcomeric isoform expression.31 Consequently, the authors concluded that normal mitochondrial function is not essential for postnatal cardiomyocyte maturation. It remains unclear how to reconcile these opposing opinions. Other than the simple explanation that the difference is due to the different mouse genetic backgrounds used by the 2 groups, we propose 6 possible explanations. First, most Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b DKO mice die within the first week after birth, and the cardiomyocyte maturation defect was evaluated by examining the expression of 3 marker genes (Nppa, Nppb, and Myh6) at P0.5.115 The early postnatal lethality of these mice precludes the detailed examination of cardiomyocyte maturation using multiple complementary experiments at later stages, as performed by another group.31 It is thus unclear to what degree the cardiomyocytes are immature and whether maturation is completely blocked or simply delayed at the neonatal stage in Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b DKO mice. A second, alternative possibility is that PGC‐1α and PGC‐1β have broader activities in mitochondrial biogenesis through regulating nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes,24 whereas Tfam only regulates mtDNA‐encoded genes.108, 109, 110 This could explain why the phenotype caused by DKO of Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b is stronger than knocking out Tfam. Third, PGC‐1α and PGC‐1β may exert certain unidentified mitochondrial‐unrelated activities to promote cardiomyocyte maturation. Therefore, the observed defect in cardiomyocyte maturation is not directly caused by mitochondrial dysfunction in the DKO hearts. Fourth, in the Tfam knockout study, the AAV9‐Cre virus was injected into P0 Tfam mice. Considerable time is required to allow the cardiomyocytes to express CRE, to knockout Tfam, and to deplete the expressed Tfam mRNA and protein. It is possible that neonatal cardiomyocytes have already begun the maturation program before the expression of Tfam is efficiently inactivated in these cells and that once the program is initiated, it no longer relies on mitochondrial biogenesis. Fifth, related to the fourth explanation, Tfam was inactivated using AAV9‐Cre virus,31 whereas Ppargc1b was inactivated using the Myh6‐Cre transgenic line.115 A high dose of virus led ≈55% of cardiomyocytes to express the reporter; however, the efficiency of inactivation of Tfam expression was not examined directly.115 Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that the failure to observe the maturation defect in AAV9‐Cre;Tfam mice is due to incomplete deletion of Tfam. The sixth possibility would be that the embryonic metabolic shift is required for the postnatal heart to undergo the neonatal metabolic shift and maturation. In this scenario, inactivation of Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b in embryonic hearts impairs the embryonic metabolic shift, which in turn causes maturation defects in postnatal hearts. In contrast, AAV9‐Cre–mediated deletion of Tfam occurred postnatally, and the embryonic metabolic shift was not affected in these mice. Future studies are warranted to solve this important issue regarding the relationship between mitochondrial functions and postnatal heart maturation.

Role of ROS in Heart Development

ROS is a physiological byproduct of ETC electron flow, and its production can be increased or uncontrolled if ETC electron flow is compromised.57, 58, 59, 60 In addition, ROS can be generated through cell membrane–bound NADPH oxidase complexes.118 Recent studies have indicated that ROS may act as signaling molecules.119 Using embryonic stem cells as a model system, a high level of ROS increased the percentage of beating cardiomyocytes in embryoid bodies.118 ROS may stimulate cardiomyocyte differentiation through multiple signaling pathways including JNK, ERK1/2, p38, Ca2+ and BMP.118, 120 However, a role for ROS in cardiac precursor cells has not been demonstrated through in vivo genetic studies. ROS levels remain high in mouse E9.5 cardiomyocytes and decrease as embryos age.32, 118, 121 The reduction in ROS levels in later stage embryos stimulates cardiomyocyte maturation, based on studies of mPTP.32, 121 Located on the mitochondrial inner membrane, mPTP is closed in matured cardiomyocytes under physiological conditions. In mouse embryonic hearts, mPTP is open until E9.5 and closes between E9.5 and E13.5.32 Closure of mPTP not only increases the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) to promote OXPHOS (aerobic respiration) but also decreases ROS levels in embryonic cardiomyocytes.32 The forced closure of mPTP using a pharmacological reagent (cyclosporin A) or deletion of Ppid (peptidylprolyl isomerase D; CyP‐D [cyclophilin D]), which is required for mPTP opening, led to prematuration of both mitochondria and cardiomyocytes at E9.5.32 Treatment of E9.5 cardiomyocytes with an antioxidant (Trolox, Hoffmann‐La Roche Inc) stimulated, and treatment with a stable oxidant (tertiary butyl hydroperoxide) inhibited, cardiomyocyte differentiation, regardless of whether mPTP was open or closed.32 Collectively, these data support the idea that closure of mPTP acts upstream of redox signaling and reduces ROS levels in embryonic cardiomyocytes, which stimulates their maturation.32 In addition to regulating cardiomyocyte differentiation and maturation, ROS may regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation. The treatment of cardiomyocytes derived from embryonic stem cells or mouse neonatal hearts with 100 nmol/L H2O2 significantly enhanced their proliferation.120, 122 H2O2 treatment increased nuclear localization of cyclin D1, reduced the expression of p27Kip1 (a negative cell cycle regulator), and enhanced phosphorylation of retinoblastoma in cultured myocardial cells.120 Abnormally high ROS levels due to mitochondrial dysfunction in embryonic hearts may lead to severe inborn cardiomyopathy. For example, embryonic heart inactivation of Tfam led to mitochondrial dysfunction, elevated ROS products, reduced cardiomyocyte proliferation, and embryonic lethality.31 Furthermore, inhibition of ROS or the DNA damage response pathway using MitoTEMPO (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or MK‐1755 (a WEE1 [WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase] kinase inhibitor) rescued the cell proliferation defect observed in cultured fetal cardiomyocytes in which Tfam was deleted.31 Taken together, ROSs exert complex activities during cardiogenesis, and their activities are stage dependent. Increased ROS levels stimulate cardiomyocyte differentiation from precursor cells. At later stages, reduction of ROS levels through closure of mPTP is required for normal maturation of cardiomyocytes. In addition, ROS can promote cardiomyocyte proliferation, according to evidence from in vitro cell culture analysis. Mitochondrial dysfunction in fetal hearts elevates ROS species, which triggers the DNA damage pathway to block cardiomyocyte proliferation.

Role of Apoptosis in OFT Remodeling

In addition to their role as the cellular powerhouse, it is well established that mitochondria play key roles in controlling cell apoptosis (programmed cell death).123, 124, 125 In contrast to necrosis, which is caused by acute cellular injury, apoptosis is a precisely controlled process that regulates multiple processes during embryonic development.126, 127, 128 In apoptotic cells, the death signal activates the proapoptotic protein BAX (BCL‐2–associated X protein) and BAK (BCL2‐antagonist/killer 1), which then associate with the mitochondrial outer membrane to form pores.123, 124, 125 The pore alters the outer membrane potential and releases cytochrome c from the intermembrane space to the mitochondrial cytosol, where it interacts with APAF‐1 (apoptotic protease activating factor 1) to form the apoptosome.123, 124, 125 Apoptosomes activate the caspase cascade to induce cell death.123, 124, 125 In addition to cytochrome c, mitochondria may also release SMAC (second mitochondrial‐derived activator of caspases) to activate caspases.124, 125, 129 During heart development, apoptosis serves as the driving force for OFT shortening and remodeling. Watanabe et al initially reported that, in chicken embryos, OFT shortening and rotation occurs through cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the proximal OFT region.130 Pharmacologically blocking apoptosis in ex ovo chicken cultures resulted in an abnormally long infundibulum. In some embryo cultures, the OFT failed to rotate, leading to the double‐outlet‐right‐ventricle defect.131 The function of cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the OFT appears to be evolutionarily conserved from chicken to mammals. In mouse embryonic hearts, apoptosis in the proximal OFT region can be observed initially at E12.5, peaks at E13.5 to E14.5, and declines thereafter.132 The stages of apoptosis in the OFT region correlate well with the shortening period of the OFT.132 In addition to the OFT region, apoptosis can be detected in the ventricle and endocardial cells, suggesting that it may also be involved in ventricular morphogenesis.131 Considering the well‐established role of mitochondria in apoptosis, we speculate that apoptosis during OFT remodeling is mitochondria dependent; however, we cannot exclude the involvement of mitochondria‐independent mechanisms. Further studies are required to reveal the signal that initiates cell death in the OFT and to understand exactly which apoptotic pathway is used to regulate OFT remodeling.

Regulation of Heart Development by Mitochondrial Fission and Fusion

Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles with constantly changing morphologies in response to altered inter‐ and intracellular environments.133, 134, 135, 136 The mitochondrial tubular network is regulated by fusion and fission. Reducing or blocking mitochondrial fusion (or overfission) leads to the fragmentation of mitochondria and the loss of mtDNA, whereas reducing or blocking fission (or overfusion) results in enlargement of mitochondria and overly interconnected tubules.38, 137, 138, 139 Regulators of mitochondrial fission and fusion are GTPases and belong to the dynamin family.136, 140 MFN1 (mitofusin 1) and MFN2 are the GTPases that act on the mitochondrial outer membrane to promote fusion. Systematic knockout and rescue experiments have revealed that MFN1 and MFN2 possess partially overlapping functions in regulating mitochondrial morphology.141, 142 To reveal their potential functions during heart development, Mfn1 and Mfn2 were simultaneously inactivated in embryonic hearts using the Nkx2.5‐Cre line,143, 144 which inactivates target genes in the early cardiac crescent at E7.5.145 Mfn1/Mfn2 cardiac DKO mice die between E9.5 and E15.5. Double‐mutant hearts displayed severe hypocellular defects in their myocardial wall at E13.5.143 Expression of multiple cardiac differentiation markers was impaired by deletion of the 2 genes at E9.5. Further mechanistic studies using embryonic stem cells as the model system suggested that blocking mitochondrial fusion decreases the capacity of Ca2+ to enter mitochondria and increases the Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm. Consequently, calcineurin activity is upregulated, which increases Notch signaling and impairs cardiomyocyte differentiation.143 The studies on double deletion of Mfn1 and Mfn2 using Nkx2.5‐Cre thus provided definitive evidence to support the essential role of mitochondrial fusion during cardiomyocyte differentiation.143, 144 Cardiac functions of Mfn1 and Mfn2 have also been examined using another Cre line, Myh6‐Cre, which inactivates target genes at midgestation.146 The transcripts of both genes were efficiently reduced at E15.5 in DKO mice; however, no cardiac phenotype was observed in these mice from E15.5 to P0, suggesting that mitochondrial fusion is not essential for heart development from midgestation to birth.146 Starting from P7, many DKO mice start to display dilated cardiomyopathy, and they all die before P16, supporting the essential role of mitochondrial fusion in postnatal cardiac development. Therefore, the results from Nkx2.5‐Cre and Myh6‐Cre lines have revealed that mitochondrial fusion is critical for heart development at different stages. The DRP1 (Dynamin Related Protein 1) GTPase acts on the outer membrane of mitochondria to promote fission.38, 137, 138, 147 The potential role of Drp1 during mouse heart development has been studied using 2 different Cre drivers to knockout Drp1 in embryonic hearts. Inactivation of Drp1 using the Myh6‐Cre line reduced the expression of DRP1 to 50% of the control level at P1, and the activity of the left ventricle in mutants was reduced at this stage according to echocardiographic analyses.148 However, it is unclear whether the reduced activity of the left ventricle in mutant hearts began during the fetal stage. At P7, the mutant animals displayed multiple cardiac defects, including reduced heart rate, abnormal patterns of electrocardiography and reduced left ventricle contraction. The sizes of mitochondria were abnormally enlarged in cardiomyocytes with Drp1 deleted, and OXPHOS was also impaired.148 All mutant mice died between P9 and P11. In another study, Drp1 was inactivated by a muscle cell Cre line, MCK‐Cre.149 Reduced expression of DRP1 was not observed until P1 in mutant hearts. Mice with Drp1 inactivated using MCK‐Cre died between P7 and P10, which was slightly earlier than observed with mice in which the Myh6‐Cre line was used. Mutant mice at P7 showed dilated cardiomyopathy, disorganized myofibrils, impaired mitochondrial respiration, and reduced hypertrophic growth of postnatal hearts.149 Collectively, the 2 complementary studies support the essential role of mitochondrial fission in regulating early postnatal heart development and function. Whether mitochondrial fission also regulates embryonic heart development, as mitochondrial fusion does, will need to be addressed using Cre lines acting at earlier stages in embryonic hearts. It should be noted that in addition to the canonical activities, MFN1, MFN2, and DRP1 also exhibit noncanonical functions.150 MFN1/2 tethers mitochondria to the endoplasmic reticulum or the sarcoplasmic reticulum to form contact sites, which are important for mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and bioenergetics.151, 152, 153 In addition, MFN2 is involved in mitophagy, which will be discussed next. The noncanonical activities of DRP1 include regulating mPTP opening, respiration, mitophagy, and cell death.154, 155, 156 Therefore, the phenotypes observed in Mfn1, Mfn2, and Drp1 knockout hearts are likely caused by the combined defects of multiple aspects of mitochondrial activities rather than solely by impaired mitochondrial fusion or fission.

Regulation of the Perinatal Metabolic Shift by Mitophagy in Mouse Hearts

Mitophagy refers to the selective degradation of mitochondria by autophagy, a process that can be induced through both Parkin‐dependent and Parkin‐independent pathways.157, 158 A previous elegant study provided strong evidence to support the critical role of Parkin‐dependent mitophagy in regulating the perinatal metabolic shift in mouse hearts.159 The MFN2 T111A/S442A (MFN2 AA) mutation inhibits mitochondrial Parkin localization and thus blocks Parkin‐dependent mitophagy. However, this mutation does not affect mitochondrial fusion or Parkin‐independent mitophagy induced by starvation.159 Ectopic expression of MFN2 AA in neonatal cardiomyocytes led to cardiac dilation, impaired contraction, pulmonary congestion, and eventually heart failure.159 All mutant animals died 7 to 8 weeks after birth. Conversely, ectopic expression of a comparable level of wild‐type MFN2 in neonatal hearts did not result in any overt defects. MFN2 AA mitochondria retained fetal mitochondrial morphology, failed to undergo maturation, and exhibited impaired functionality.159 Furthermore, high‐throughput RNA‐sequencing examination showed that perinatal cardiac expression of MFN2 AA blocked metabolic gene reprogramming in postnatal hearts,159 suggesting that Parkin‐dependent mitophagy is required for perinatal mitochondrial maturation at both the morphological and gene expression levels. A mismatch between mitochondrial programming and the substrate availability was proposed as the major cause for the juvenile cardiomyopathy observed in mice with cardiac ectopic expression of MFN2 AA.159

Conclusion

Accumulated evidence has established that mitochondria not only serve as the cellular powerhouse enabling the heart to beat but also play a critical role in regulating embryonic and neonatal heart development in mammals (Figure 5). In Table, we summarize the roles of genes important for mitochondrial morphology and function during mammalian cardiogenesis that are discussed in this review. Revealing the role of mitochondria in heart development and the underlying mechanisms will provide crucial clues to the development of novel clinical applications aimed at treating cardiomyopathies caused by mitochondrial dysfunction in infants.
Figure 5

Summary of mitochondrial functions during cardiogenesis. E indicates, embryonic day; OFT, outflow tract; P, postnatal day; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Table 1

Functions of Genes Important for Mitochondrial Morphology/Activity During Cardiogenesis

Names of GeneGenetic Manipulation MethodsDefects in Mutants
Drp1 1. Myh6‐Cre, inactivation of target genes in fetal hearts 2. MCK‐Cre, perinatal inactivation of target genes in cardiac and skeleton muscle cells Lethality between P9 and P11. Reduced heart rate, abnormal patterns of electrocardiography, and reduced left ventricle activity at P7. Enlarged mitochondria in cardiomyocytes. Impaired OXPHOS.148 Lethality between P7 and P10. Dilated cardiomyopathy, disorganized myofibrils, impaired mitochondrial respiration, and reduced hypertrophic growth at P7.149
Mfn1 and Mfn2 1. Nkx2.5‐Cre, cardiac precursor cells 2. Myh6‐Cre, inactivation of target genes in fetal hearts Lethality between E9.5 and E15.5. Severe hypocellular defects in the myocardial wall at E13.5.143 Lethality before P16. Dilated cardiomyopathy at P7.146
Mfn2 (T111A/S442A) Transgenic expression of Mfn2(T111A/S442A) in neonatal hearts, only affects mitophagyLethality 7 to 8 wks after birth. Impaired mitophagy. Cardiac dilation, impaired contraction, pulmonary congestion, and eventually heart failure.159
Ppargc1a and Ppargc1b Myh6‐Cre inactivation of Ppargc1b on the Ppargc1a−/− background (Ppargc1a−/−; Ppargc1b loxp/loxp ; Myh6‐Cre), inactivation of target genes in fetal heartsLethality during the first week after birth. Heart failure, reduced heart size and activities. Impaired neonatal cardiomyocyte maturation.115
Tfam 1. MCK‐Cre, perinatal inactivation of target genes in cardiac and skeleton muscle cells 2. MCK‐Nls‐Cre, perinatal inactivation of target genes in cardiac and skeleton muscle cells. CRE activity weaker than MCK‐Cre 3. AAV9‐cTnt‐Cre, neonatal injection Deficiency in the respiratory chain, blockage of atrioventricular heart conduction, dilated cardiomyopathy and animal lethality between P15 and P35.111 Survive to 10 to 12 weeks after birth. Deficiency in respiration. Reactivation of a fetal gene expression program between 4 and 9 weeks after birth.112 Dilated cardiomyopathy. No defect in postnatal cardiomyocyte maturation.31
Summary of mitochondrial functions during cardiogenesis. E indicates, embryonic day; OFT, outflow tract; P, postnatal day; ROS, reactive oxygen species. Functions of Genes Important for Mitochondrial Morphology/Activity During Cardiogenesis

Sources of Funding

Research in the authors’ laboratory is supported by R01 (R01HL095783) and American Heart Association (17GRNT33410623) grants awarded to Jiao.

Disclosures

None.
  157 in total

1.  Franklin H. Epstein Lecture. Cardiac development and implications for heart disease.

Authors:  Jonathan A Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Chemical inhibition of the mitochondrial division dynamin reveals its role in Bax/Bak-dependent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization.

Authors:  Ann Cassidy-Stone; Jerry E Chipuk; Elena Ingerman; Cheng Song; Choong Yoo; Tomomi Kuwana; Mark J Kurth; Jared T Shaw; Jenny E Hinshaw; Douglas R Green; Jodi Nunnari
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Mitochondrial dynamics--mitochondrial fission and fusion in human diseases.

Authors:  Stephen L Archer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Programmed cell death in animal development.

Authors:  M D Jacobson; M Weil; M C Raff
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Molecular insight into heart development and congenital heart disease: An update review from the Arab countries.

Authors:  Elhadi H Aburawi; Hanan E Aburawi; Keith M Bagnall; Zahurul A Bhuiyan
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 6.  Regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetics by the non-canonical roles of mitochondrial dynamics proteins in the heart.

Authors:  Wang Wang; Celia Fernandez-Sanz; Shey-Shing Sheu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.187

Review 7.  Second heart field cardiac progenitor cells in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Alexandre Francou; Edouard Saint-Michel; Karim Mesbah; Magali Théveniau-Ruissy; M Sameer Rana; Vincent M Christoffels; Robert G Kelly
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-10-07

8.  Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1 alpha controls the energy state and contractile function of cardiac muscle.

Authors:  Zoltan Arany; Huamei He; Jiandie Lin; Kirsten Hoyer; Christoph Handschin; Okan Toka; Ferhaan Ahmad; Takashi Matsui; Sherry Chin; Pei-Hsuan Wu; Igor I Rybkin; John M Shelton; Monia Manieri; Saverio Cinti; Frederick J Schoen; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Anthony Rosenzweig; Joanne S Ingwall; Bruce M Spiegelman
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  Effects of Zidovudine Treatment on Heart mRNA Expression and Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Associated with Alterations in Deoxynucleoside Triphosphate Composition in a Neonatal Rat Model.

Authors:  Jacob W Snowdin; Chia-Heng Hsiung; Daniel G Kesterson; Vasudeva G Kamath; Edward E McKee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Maturation of Cardiac Energy Metabolism During Perinatal Development.

Authors:  Jérôme Piquereau; Renée Ventura-Clapier
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Heart regeneration: 20 years of progress and renewed optimism.

Authors:  Jessica C Garbern; Richard T Lee
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Drp1 regulates transcription of ribosomal protein genes in embryonic hearts.

Authors:  Qiancong Zhao; Shun Yan; Jin Lu; Danitra J Parker; Huiying Wu; Qianchuang Sun; David K Crossman; Shanrun Liu; Qin Wang; Hiromi Sesaki; Kasturi Mitra; Kexiang Liu; Kai Jiao
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Chronic hypoxia alters cardiac mitochondrial complex protein expression and activity in fetal guinea pigs in a sex-selective manner.

Authors:  Hong Song; Brian M Polster; Loren P Thompson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 4.  Heart failure in diabetes.

Authors:  Stanislovas S Jankauskas; Urna Kansakar; Fahimeh Varzideh; Scott Wilson; Pasquale Mone; Angela Lombardi; Jessica Gambardella; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 8.694

5.  Three-dimensional remodelling of the cellular energy distribution system during postnatal heart development.

Authors:  Yuho Kim; Peter T Ajayi; Christopher K E Bleck; Brian Glancy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 6.  Accelerated Cardiac Aging in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Dominga Iacobazzi; Valeria Vincenza Alvino; Massimo Caputo; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Prolonged cardiac NR4A2 activation causes dilated cardiomyopathy in mice.

Authors:  Sadia Ashraf; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Romain Harmancey
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 12.416

Review 8.  The role of labile Zn2+ and Zn2+-transporters in the pathophysiology of mitochondria dysfunction in cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Belma Turan; Erkan Tuncay
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  Functional and Adaptive Significance of Promoter Mutations That Affect Divergent Myocardial Expressions of TRIM72 in Primates.

Authors:  Yuanqing Feng; Hongzhan Xu; Jinghao Liu; Ning Xie; Lei Gao; Yanyun He; Yuan Yao; Fengxiang Lv; Yan Zhang; Jian Lu; Wei Zhang; Chuan-Yun Li; Xinli Hu; Ziheng Yang; Rui-Ping Xiao
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Phosphodiesterases Expression during Murine Cardiac Development.

Authors:  Thays Maria da Conceição Silva Carvalho; Silvia Cardarelli; Mauro Giorgi; Andrea Lenzi; Andrea M Isidori; Fabio Naro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.