Literature DB >> 31214862

Anti-drug Antibody Assay Validation: Improved Reporting of the Assay Selectivity via Simpler Positive Control Recovery Data Analysis.

Boris Gorovits1, Marcela Araya Roldan2, Daniel Baltrukonis3, Chun-Hua Cai3, Jean Donley2, Darshana Jani2, John Kamerud2, Frederick McCush3, Jeffrey S Thomas3, Ying Wang2.   

Abstract

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay selectivity is evaluated during assay validation to assess the potential for individual matrices to interfere with detection of ADA. While current EMA and FDA guideline documents suggest comparative analysis with and without matrix, they do not provide specific recommendations on the acceptance criteria such as an acceptable percent positive control (PC) recovery range or positive rate. Industry has adopted an approach where recovery of PC spiked sample is expected to fall within ± 20% (80 to 120%) vs. that for the PC material spiked in negative control matrix or assay buffer. Here, it is proposed that ADA assay selectivity evaluated using a qualitative assessment of PC recovery vs. a PK-like quantitative method may be more appropriate. The PC recovery test should focus on the reliability of the method to detect the low PC level in individual samples and avoid false-negative ADA reporting. Therefore, it is proposed that assessment of high PC level as well as the assessment of quantitative percent recovery (within ± 20%) should not be included in the test. The recovery test may be viewed as acceptable should a pre-selected number of individual samples (for example at least 8 or 9 out of 10) prepared at the low PC concentration of the assay score as ADA positive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADA; ADA assay selectivity; ADA assay validation; anti-drug antibody

Year:  2019        PMID: 31214862     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0347-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  9 in total

1.  Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  J W Findlay; W C Smith; J W Lee; G D Nordblom; I Das; B S DeSilva; M N Khan; R R Bowsher
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Solution ELISA as a platform of choice for development of robust, drug tolerant immunogenicity assays in support of drug development.

Authors:  Alvydas Mikulskis; Dave Yeung; Meena Subramanyam; Lakshmi Amaravadi
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Detection of high- and low-affinity antibodies against a human monoclonal antibody using various technology platforms.

Authors:  Meina Liang; Scott L Klakamp; Cherryl Funelas; Hong Lu; Brandon Lam; Carina Herl; Amber Umble; Andrew W Drake; Min Pak; Natasha Ageyeva; Rao Pasumarthi; Lorin K Roskos
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.738

4.  An Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) assay for detection of anti-drug antibody to monoclonal antibody therapeutics in the presence of high levels of drug.

Authors:  James S Bourdage; Carolyn A Cook; Daphne L Farrington; Jana S Chain; Robert J Konrad
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 5.  Recommendations for the validation of immunoassays used for detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products.

Authors:  Gopi Shankar; Viswanath Devanarayan; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Yu Chen Barrett; Ronald Bowsher; Deborah Finco-Kent; Michele Fiscella; Boris Gorovits; Susan Kirschner; Michael Moxness; Thomas Parish; Valerie Quarmby; Holly Smith; Wendell Smith; Linda A Zuckerman; Eugen Koren
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 6.  Protein-based matrix interferences in ligand-binding assays.

Authors:  Boris Gorovits; Jim McNally; Corinna Fiorotti; Sheldon Leung
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Assay signal as an alternative to titer for assessment of magnitude of an antidrug antibody response.

Authors:  Marta Starcevic Manning; Mark A Kroenke; Stephanie A Lee; Simon E Harrison; Sarah A Hoofring; Daniel T Mytych; Vibha Jawa
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Evaluation of a generic immunoassay with drug tolerance to detect immune complexes in serum samples from cynomolgus monkeys after administration of human antibodies.

Authors:  Kay Stubenrauch; Uwe Wessels; Ulrich Essig; Rudolf Vogel; Julia Schleypen
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.935

9.  Recommendations for the Assessment and Management of Pre-existing Drug-Reactive Antibodies During Biotherapeutic Development.

Authors:  Li Xue; Adrienne Clements-Egan; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Mary Birchler; Boris Gorovits; Meina Liang; Heather Myler; Shobha Purushothama; Marta Starcevic Manning; Crystal Sung
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.009

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Screening natural product extracts for potential enzyme inhibitors: protocols, and the standardisation of the usage of blanks in α-amylase, α-glucosidase and lipase assays.

Authors:  Chintha Lankatillake; Shiqi Luo; Matthew Flavel; George Binh Lenon; Harsharn Gill; Tien Huynh; Daniel Anthony Dias
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.993

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.