BACKGROUND: Titer methods are commonly used to characterize the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response. Assay S/N is an appealing alternative, but the circumstances under which use of signal-to-noise (S/N) is appropriate have not been well defined. RESULTS: We validated both titer and S/N-based methods for several therapeutics. S/N correlated strongly with titer both in aggregate and when examined on a per subject basis. Analysis of impact of antibody magnitude on pharmacokinetics yielded the same result using either method. Each assay demonstrated excellent precision, good linearity, and adequate drug tolerance. CONCLUSION: Under these circumstances, assay S/N is a valid alternative to titer for assessment of the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response.
BACKGROUND: Titer methods are commonly used to characterize the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response. Assay S/N is an appealing alternative, but the circumstances under which use of signal-to-noise (S/N) is appropriate have not been well defined. RESULTS: We validated both titer and S/N-based methods for several therapeutics. S/N correlated strongly with titer both in aggregate and when examined on a per subject basis. Analysis of impact of antibody magnitude on pharmacokinetics yielded the same result using either method. Each assay demonstrated excellent precision, good linearity, and adequate drug tolerance. CONCLUSION: Under these circumstances, assay S/N is a valid alternative to titer for assessment of the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response.
Authors: Boris Gorovits; Marcela Araya Roldan; Daniel Baltrukonis; Chun-Hua Cai; Jean Donley; Darshana Jani; John Kamerud; Frederick McCush; Jeffrey S Thomas; Ying Wang Journal: AAPS J Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 4.009