| Literature DB >> 31212993 |
Rayanne R Pereira1,2, Matteo Testi3, Francesca Rossi4, Jose O C Silva Junior5, Roseane M Ribeiro-Costa6, Ruggero Bettini7,8, Patrizia Santi9,10, Cristina Padula11, Fabio Sonvico12,13.
Abstract
Ucuùba fat is fat obtained from a plant found in South America, mainly in Amazonian Brazil. Due to its biocompatibility and bioactivity, Ucuùba fat was used for the production of ketoconazole-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in view of an application for the treatment of onychomycosis and other persistent fungal infections. The development and optimization of Ucuùba fat-based NLC were performed using a Box-Behnken design of experiments. The independent variables were surfactant concentration (% w/v), liquid lipids concentration (% w/v), solid lipids concentration (% w/v), while the outputs of interest were particle size, polydispersity index (PDI) and drug encapsulation efficiency (EE). Ucuùba fat-based NLC were produced and the process was optimized by the development of a predictive mathematical model. Applying the model, two formulations with pre-determined particle size, i.e., 30 and 85 nm, were produced for further evaluation. The optimized formulations were characterized and showed particle size in agreement to the predicted value, i.e., 33.6 nm and 74.6 nm, respectively. The optimized formulations were also characterized using multiple techniques in order to investigate the solid state of drug and excipients (DSC and XRD), particle morphology (TEM), drug release and interactions between the formulation components (FTIR). Furthermore, particle size, surface charge and drug loading efficiency of the formulations were studied during a one-month stability study and did not show evidence of significant modification.Entities:
Keywords: Amazonian fat; Box Behnken Design; Ucuùba fat; antifungal therapy; onychomycosis; solid lipid nanoparticles
Year: 2019 PMID: 31212993 PMCID: PMC6630981 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11060284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Input factors and their levels for Box-Behnken design.
| Input Factors | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |
| Surfactant Concentration (% | 3 | 4.5 | 6 |
| Liquid Lipid Concentration (% | 2 | 2.5 | 3 |
| Solid Lipid Concentration (% | 7 | 7.5 | 8 |
Experimental results of the Box-Behnken design.
| Experiment # | Surfactant (% | Liquid Lipid (% | Solid Lipid (% | Size (nm) |
| Ketoconazole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5 | 2 | 8 | 65.9 | 0.506 | 93.91 |
| 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 8 | 79.4 | 0.248 | 98.71 |
| 3 | 6 | 2.5 | 7 | 26.6 | 0.432 | 96.05 |
| 4 | 4.5 | 3 | 8 | 68.0 | 0.413 | 97.16 |
| 5 | 4.5 | 3 | 7 | 45.1 | 0.492 | 99.66 |
| 6 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 45.4 | 0.360 | 97.75 |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 7.5 | 82.1 | 0.291 | 94.67 |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 7.5 | 90.1 | 0.311 | 97.26 |
| 9 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 47.6 | 0.399 | 97.67 |
| 10 | 6 | 2.5 | 8 | 39.8 | 0.533 | 97.99 |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | 7.5 | 66.8 | 0.558 | 96.38 |
| 12 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 43.3 | 0.449 | 98.56 |
| 13 | 4.5 | 2 | 7 | 54.0 | 0.481 | 97.95 |
| 14 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 48.1 | 0.329 | 99.50 |
| 15 | 3 | 2.5 | 7 | 69.8 | 0.263 | 96.55 |
| 16 | 6 | 3 | 7.5 | 23.9 | 0.288 | 98.29 |
| 17 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 63.0 | 0.461 | 96.57 |
1 Polydispersity Index (PDI ≤ 0.1 highly monodisperse particles; 0.1–0.4 slightly polydisperse; ≥ 0.4 highly polydisperse samples) [34].
ANOVA results obtained for the regression model calculated from the experimental design data for the prediction particle size, PDI and EE.
| Factors | Particle Size ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient Estimate | Coefficient Estimate | Coefficient Estimate | |||||||
| Intercept | 49.49 | 11.56 | 0.0020 * | 0.3996 | 4.26 | 0.0346 * | 98.1 | 0.64 | 0.7392 |
|
| −20.54 | 66.07 | 0.0001 * | 0.0873 | 17.58 | 0.0041 * | 0.1900 | 0.10 | 0.7649 |
|
| −5.21 | 4.24 | 0.0784 | −0.0415 | 3.98 | 0.0864 | 1.18 | 3.74 | 0.0942 |
|
| 7.19 | 8.10 | 0.02 * | 0.0040 | 0.04 | 0.8530 | −0.3050 | 0.25 | 0.6330 |
|
| −12.73 | 12.69 | 0.0092 * | −0.0725 | 6.07 | 0.0433 * | −0.1700 | 0.04 | 0.8497 |
|
| 0.8825 | 0.06 | 0.8120 | 0.0290 | 0.97 | 0.3573 | −0.0550 | 0.00 | 0.9510 |
|
| 2.76 | 0.59 | 0.4660 | −0.0260 | 0.78 | 0.4063 | 0.3850 | 0.20 | 0.6695 |
|
| 5.96 | 2.93 | 0.1307 | −0.0708 | 6.09 | 0.0430 * | −0.6025 | 0.51 | 0.4976 |
|
| 10.29 | 8.73 | 0.0212 * | 0.0332 | 1.34 | 0.2851 | −0.7575 | 0.81 | 0.3984 |
|
| −1.56 | 0.20 | 0.6682 | 0.0332 | 1.96 | 0.2038 | −0.0825 | 0.01 | 0.9247 |
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.9369 | 0.8456 | 0.4513 | ||||||
|
| 11.48 | 4.33 | 0.6347 | ||||||
* Significant effect of the factor on individual responses. Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; PDI, polydispersity index; EE, encapsulations efficiency; X1 surfactant concentration; X2 liquid lipid concentration; X3 solid lipid concentration; F-value, ratio of the mean regression sum of squares divided by the mean error sum of squares; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 1Pareto chart (a) and three-dimensional response surface plots showing the effect of (b) the concentration of liquid lipid and surfactant, (c) the concentration of surfactant and solid lipid and (d) the concentration of liquid lipid and solid lipid on nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) particle size, respectively.
Figure 2Pareto chart (a) and three-dimensional response surface plots showing the effect of (b) the concentration of liquid lipid and surfactant, (c) the concentration of surfactant and solid lipid and (d) the concentration of liquid lipid and solid lipid on NLC polydispersity index (PDI), respectively.
Figure 3Pareto chart (a) and three-dimensional response surface plots showing the effect of the concentration of liquid lipid and surfactant (b), the concentration of surfactant and solid lipid (c) and the concentration of liquid lipid and solid lipid (d) on NLC ketoconazole encapsulation efficiency (EE), respectively.
Composition of the optimized Ucuùba fat NLC formulations F 30 and F 85 along with the predicted, observed and residual values of the responses.
| Input Factors | F 30 | F 85 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surfactant (% | 6 | 3 | ||||
| Liquid Lipid (% | 3 | 2.75 | ||||
| Solid Lipid (% | 7.63 | 7.68 | ||||
| Responses | Predicted | Observed | Residual * | Predicted | Observed | Residual * |
| Size (nm) | 30.0 | 33.6 ± 0.2 | −3.6 | 85.0 | 74.6 ± 0.3 | 10.4 |
|
| 0.339 | 0.255 ± 0.001 | 0.084 | 0.257 | 0.143 ± 0.005 | 0.114 |
| 97.85 | 98.20 ± 0.62 | −0.35 | 97.67 | 98.70 ± 0.69 | −1.03 | |
* Residual = Predicted − Observed.
Figure 4Representative TEM images of the optimized Ucuùba fat NLC formulations (a) F 30 and (b) F 85 (magnification 100,000×).
Figure 5The particle size distribution of (a) F30 and (b) F85 by dynamic light scattering (DLS).
Physico-chemical characterization of optimized Ucuùba fat NLC during storage at room temperature.
| Time (days) | F 30 | F 85 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z-Average (nm) |
| Zeta Potential (mV) | Z-Average 1 (nm) |
| Zeta Potential (mV) | |
| 0 | 33.6 ± 0.2 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | −15.2 ± 0.8 | 74.6 ± 0.3 | 0.14 ± 0.00 | −24.5 ± 0.6 |
| 1 | 33.7 ± 0.1 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | −16.4 ± 1.3 | 74.1 ± 0.2 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | −21.3 ± 1.1 |
| 7 | 34.4 ± 0.3 | 0.19 ± 0.00 | −13.3 ± 1.1 | 72.9 ± 0.3 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | −20.2 ± 6.5 |
| 15 | 33.3 ± 0.2 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | −12.1 ± 1.3 | 71.1 ± 0.1 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | −17.4 ± 0.6 |
| 30 | 33.8 ± 0.2 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | −15.2 ± 0.8 | 73 ± 0.2 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | −20.2 ± 1.5 |
1 Z-average = Average particle size.
Figure 6The release profile of ketoconazole from F 30 and F 85 using the dialysis bag method (n = 3, ±SD).
Figure 7DSC traces of Ucuùba fat/Capryol™ 90 mixtures (a) and of the optimized Ucuùba fat NLC formulations F 30 and F 85 along with ketoconazole raw material (b).
Melting temperatures, enthalpy and crystallinity index (CI) obtained by DSC analysis of the Ucuùba fat alone and in mixture with Capryol™ 90.
| Ucuùba Fat/Capryol™ 90 Weight Ratio | Peak (°C) | Enthalpy (J/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:0 | 37.76 | 45.11 | 42.99 | −99.42 | 100 |
| 3:1 | 31.96 | 41.77 | 39.79 | −71.38 | 53.84 |
| 1:1 | 28.90 | 40.00 | 36.98 | −52,01 | 26.15 |
| 1:2 | 26.61 | 38.91 | 35.24 | −26.09 | 8.72 |
Figure 8The X-ray diffraction spectra of Ucuùba fat and optimized Ucuùba fat NLC formulations F 30 and F 85.
Figure 9FT-IR spectra of ketoconazole, Ucuùba fat, Capryol™ 90 and of optimized Ucuùba fat NLC formulations F 30 and F 85.