| Literature DB >> 31212938 |
Maiko Ohtaka1, Izumi Hiramoto2, Hiroshi Minagawa3, Masashi Matsuzaki4, Hideya Kodama5.
Abstract
This study aimed to obtain screening data on the maturity status of the tibial tuberosity in schoolchildren of higher elementary school grades for risk management of Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD). The maturity stages and cartilage thicknesses at the tibial tuberosity were determined by ultrasonography on the occasion of a school-based musculoskeletal examination for 124 grade 5-6 elementary schoolchildren, and their associations with the students' demographic characteristics and OSD were examined. The time-dependent changes of the maturity status of the tibial tuberosity were also examined in grade 5 students (n = 26) by a longitudinal survey. The cross-sectional survey showed that the epiphyseal stage was reached in 89% of girls and 35% of boys. The girls who had experienced menarche (n = 28) were all in the epiphyseal stage and had a decreased cartilage thickness (p = 0.004, after adjusting maturity stages). Students with OSD (n = 5) were all girls in the epiphyseal stage, and only two of them had an increased cartilage thickness. During the longitudinal survey, a marked increase in cartilage thickness from the previous measurement was observed in three boys (without clinical symptoms) and a girl who newly developed OSD. Two students with OSD without chronic pain had thin cartilage. In conclusion, for schoolchildren of higher elementary school grades, the risk of OSD is higher among girls with the epiphyseal stage. Cartilage thickness may not contribute to the diagnosis of OSD, since thick cartilage is not very common in OSD. However, cartilage thickness may reflect the status of OSD.Entities:
Keywords: Osgood–Schlatter disease; cartilage thickness; musculoskeletal examination; schoolchildren of higher elementary school grades; tibial tuberosity
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31212938 PMCID: PMC6616442 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic characteristics and results of a musculoskeletal examination of 124 grade 5 and 6 elementary school children involved in a cross-sectional survey.
| Profiles of Subjects | Boys ( | Girls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic characteristics | |||
| Age (year) | 10.9 ± 0.7 | 10.9 ± 0.8 | |
| Height (cm) | 144 ± 6 | 147 ± 8 | |
| Weight (kg) | 36.5 ± 5.4 | 39.3 ± 7.9 | |
| Appearance of secondary sex characteristics * | 1 (2) | 28 (39) | |
| Sports club affiliation | 35 (69) | 46 (64) | |
| Results of a musculoskeletal examination | |||
| Basic movements | |||
| Inability to squat | 5 (10) | 14 (19) | |
| Inability to bend forward | 13 (25) | 7 (10) | |
| Musculoskeletal problems | |||
| Chronic pain (systemic) | 2 (4) | 16 (22) | |
| Chronic pain (knee) | 1 (2) | 9 (13) | |
| Musculoskeletal disorder (systemic) | 10 (19) | 14 (19) | |
| Osgood–Schlatter disease | 0 | 5 (7) | |
Values are means ± standard deviation or numbers of students (%). * Determined by the occurrence of voice change in boys or menarche in girls.
Figure 1Measurement of cartilage thickness at the tibial tuberosity for each maturity stage. The cartilage thickness at the tibial tuberosity is estimated by the largest diameter of the true circle drawn in the space of the apophyseal cartilage.
Proportion of subjects (124 grade 5–6 elementary schoolchildren) in tibial tuberosity maturity stages, as well as demographic characteristics, frequency of Osgood–Schlatter disease, and cartilage thickness at the tibial tuberosity of subjects in each maturity stage by sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Demographic characteristics | ||||||
| Age (years) | 10.5 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.5 | - | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c ** |
| Height (cm) | 139 ± 4 | 145 ± 3 | 150 ± 5 | - | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Weight (kg) | 33 ± 4 | 34 ± 5 | 40 ± 7 | - | <0.001 | a < b *, a < c **, b < c * |
| Appearance of voice change | 0 | 0 | 1/18 (6) | - | 0.382 | |
| Sports club affiliation | 11/22 (50) | 9/12 (75) | 15/18 (83) | - | 0.067 | |
| Osgood–Schlatter disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | |
| Cartilage thickness (mm) | 8.1 ± 1.4 | 6.2 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | - | <0.001 | a > b **, a > c ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Demographic characteristics | ||||||
| Age (years) | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 10.2 ± 0.4 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 11 | 0.013 | a’< c’ **, b’ < c’ * |
| Height (cm) | 132 ± 4 | 136 ± 2 | 148 ± 7 | 154 | 0.008 | b’ < c’ ** |
| Weight (kg) | 29 ± 0 | 29 ± 2 | 40 ± 7 | 53 | <0.001 | a’ < c’ **, b’ < c’ ** |
| Appearance of menarche | 0 | 0 | 27/64 (42) | 1/1(100) | 0.097 | |
| Sports club affiliation | 2/2 (100) | 4/5 (80) | 39/64 (61) | 1/1(100) | 0.475 | |
| Osgood–Schlatter disease | 0 | 0 | 5/64 (8) | 0 | 0.880 | |
| Cartilage thickness (mm) | 6.9 ± 0.9 | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 0 | 0.002 | a > c * |
Values are mean ± standard deviation or number of students (%). # by one-way analysis of variance for numerical data or by the chi-squared test for percentage data. ## by Bonferroni: a, b, c or by Games-Howell: a’, b’, c’; ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Impact of demographic factors and Osgood–Schlatter disease on cartilage thickness in 124 grade 5–6 elementary schoolchildren.
| Variables |
| Cartilage Thickness (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Males | 52 | 5.9 ± 1.2 | ||
| Female | 72 | 5.5 ± 1.0 | 0.060 | |
| Age | ||||
| 10 or 11 y | 94 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | ||
| 12 y | 30 | 5.2 ± 1.0 | 0.013 | |
| Height | ||||
| ≥145cm | 57 | 5.6 ± 1.2 | ||
| <145cm | 67 | 5.7 ± 1.0 | 0.846 | |
| Weight | ||||
| ≥37kg | 59 | 5.9 ± 1.1 | ||
| <37kg | 65 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 0.057 | |
| Secondary sex characteristics * | ||||
| None | 95 | 5.7 ± 1.0 | ||
| Present | 29 | 5.1 ± 1.1 | 0.009 | |
| Sports club affiliation | ||||
| Belonged | 81 | 5.8 ± 1.1 | ||
| Not belonged | 43 | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 0.021 | |
| Osgood–Schlatter disease | ||||
| No | 119 | 5.6 ± 1.1 | ||
| Yes | 5 | 6.1 ± 1.5 | 0.321 | |
Values are means ± standard deviation. * Determined by the occurrence of voice change in boys or menarche in girls. ** Analysis of covariance, adjusted for tibial tuberosity maturity stages.
Figure 2Scatter plot of the cartilage thickness of the tibial tuberosity of girls with Osgood–Schlatter disease (OSD) (●, n = 5) together with the mean ± standard deviation of the cartilage thickness in each maturity stage for girls. * The girl did not complain of chronic knee pain.
Demographic characteristics, Osgood–Schlatter disease, tibial tuberosity maturity stages, and cartilage thickness at the tibial tuberosity at each examination time point of the longitudinal study in 26 higher elementary grade schoolchildren by sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Demographic characteristics | |||||
| Age (y) | 10.1 ± 0.3 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | a < b *, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Height (cm) | 138 ± 4 | 140 ± 4 | 147 ± 5 | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Weight (kg) | 32.8 ± 4.9 | 34.3 ± 5.1 | 37.8 ± 5.1 | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Appearance of voice change | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Sports club affiliation | 6 (60) | 6 (60) | 7 (70) | ||
| Osgood–Schlatter disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Tibial tuberosity maturity stages | |||||
| Cartilaginous stage | 9 (90) | 8 (80) | 2 (20) | ||
| Apophyseal stage | 1 (10) | 2 (20) | 5 (50) | ||
| Epiphyseal stage | 0 | 0 | 3 (30) | ||
| Bony stage | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cartilage thickness (mm) | 7.8 ± 1.1 | 8.1 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 2.0 | <0.001 | a > c **, b > c ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Demographic characteristics | |||||
| Age (y) | 10.1 ± 0.3 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 11.6 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Height (cm) | 139 ± 5 | 142 ± 5 | 149 ± 4 | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Weight (kg) | 32.5 ± 5.5 | 34.8 ± 5.9 | 40.7 ± 6.0 | <0.001 | a < b **, a < c **, b < c ** |
| Appearance of menarche | 1 (6) | 2 (13) | 9 (56) | ||
| Sports club affiliation | 11 (69) | 12 (75) | 10 (63) | ||
| Osgood–Schlatter disease | 0 | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | ||
| Tibial tuberosity maturity stages | |||||
| Cartilaginous stage | 2 (13) | 0 | 0 | ||
| Apophyseal stage | 3 (19) | 2 (13) | 0 | ||
| Epiphyseal stage | 11 (69) | 14 (88) | 16 (100) | ||
| Bony stage | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cartilage thickness (mm) | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 5.4 ± 0.9 | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 0.282 | |
Values are means ± standard deviation or numbers of students (%). # One-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). ## by Mauchly: a, b, c ; ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Figure 3Percentage of students in each maturity stage and changes in cartilage thickness of each student at each examination time point from the longitudinal survey of grade 5 students (n = 26) by sex. Maturity stage (upper panel); Cartilaginous stage , Apophyseal stage , Epiphyseal stage . * Measurement points showing ≥20% consecutive increases in cartilage thickness from the previous measurement during observation. A girl who showed ≥20% consecutive increases in cartilage thickness in grade 5 fall developed OSD.
Figure 4Ultrasound image, maturity stage, and cartilage thickness at each examination time point of the student who developed Osgood–Schlatter disease in grade 5 fall. Cartilage swelling and an irregular contour of the tibial tuberosity are observed in grade 5 fall. However, these findings are not observed in grade 6 fall. Chronic pain had disappeared by grade 6 fall.