| Literature DB >> 29344541 |
Yoichi Kaneuchi1,2, Kenichi Otoshi1,3, Michiyuki Hakozaki1, Miho Sekiguchi1, Kazuyuki Watanabe1, Takahiro Igari1, Shinichi Konno1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although tensile force on an immature tibial tuberosity is considered the main cause of Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD), the relationship between bony maturity and the pathogenesis of OSD remains obscure.Entities:
Keywords: Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD); adolescent; basketball; bone maturation process; tibial tuberosity; ultrasonography
Year: 2018 PMID: 29344541 PMCID: PMC5761927 DOI: 10.1177/2325967117749184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Ultrasonographic morphological characteristics of the tibial tuberosity (sagittal view) according to the Ehrenborg and Lagergren[9] classification. (A) The cartilaginous stage (stage C) is characterized by a large amount of apophyseal cartilage (asterisk) without a secondary ossification center. (B) The apophyseal stage (stage A) is characterized by a cartilage attachment with secondary ossification center (arrow). (C) The epiphyseal stage (stage E) is characterized by the patellar tendon (PT) attaching to the bone surface, and a thin layer of insertional cartilage (IC) is still present. (D) The bony stage (stage B) shows mature attachment.
Anthropometric Data for Participants
| Variable | Total Sample (N = 731) | Male Participants (n = 350) | Female Participants (n = 381) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 11.2 ± 1.5 | 11.2 ± 1.5 | 11.2 ± 1.6 | .83 |
| Height, cm | 146.3 ± 11.1 | 147.8 ± 11.9 | 145.1 ± 10.3 | <.01 |
| Weight, kg | 37.8 ± 9.2 | 38.9 ± 9.8 | 36.9 ± 8.6 | <.01 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 17.4 ± 2.3 | 17.6 ± 2.3 | 17.3 ± 2.3 | .07 |
Values are reported as mean ± SD.
values were compared between male and female participants.
Sex-Based Differences in Physical Characteristics According to Bony Maturity Stage
| Stage | Sex | Age, y |
| Height, cm |
| Weight, kg |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cartilage stage | Male | 10.0 ± 1.0 | <.001 | 137.6 ± 7.2 | <.001 | 31.4 ± 5.1 | <.001 |
| Female | 8.9 ± 1.2 | 127.7 ± 6.1 | 25.3 ± 3.5 | ||||
| Apophyseal stage | Male | 11.1 ± 1.1 | <.001 | 145.2 ± 7.2 | <.001 | 36.3 ± 6.3 | <.001 |
| Female | 9.9 ± 0.8 | 137.0 ± 5.8 | 29.0 ± 3.5 | ||||
| Epiphyseal stage | Male | 12.2 ± 1.1 | <.001 | 155.7 ± 10.2 | <.001 | 45.3 ± 9.1 | <.001 |
| Female | 11.4 ± 1.3 | 146.9 ± 8.4 | 37.7 ± 7.0 | ||||
| Bony stage | Male | 13.2 ± 1.0 | .636 | 163.4 ± 9.0 | .002 | 52.4 ± 6.9 | .035 |
| Female | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 155.3 ± 4.8 | 47.5 ± 6.7 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 2.Time trend of the bone maturation process of the tibial tuberosity in (A) female and (B) male participants. Among female participants, 59.2% were already in stage E by 10 years of age; almost all females were in stage E or B by 12 years, and 47.4% were skeletally mature (stage B) at 14 years. Among male participants, conversely, only 8.0% were in stage E at 10 years of age; 40.6% of males were still in stage C or stage A by 12 years, and 86.2% were in still in stage E at 14 years.
Figure 3.Prevalence of symptomatic Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) by age and sex. Prevalence peaked at approximately 12 years of age in both sexes (males, 13.8%; females, 11.4%), whereas another peak was observed in female participants at 9 to 10 years of age (9.2%-10.9%) and in male participants at 14 years (10.3%). The prevalence of symptomatic OSD increased significantly with older age in male participants and in total (P < .01). No increasing trend was noted for prevalence of OSD in female participants.
Figure 4.Prevalence of symptomatic Osgood-Schlatter disease (OSD) by bone maturity stage of the tibial tuberosity. The prevalence of symptomatic OSD increased significantly with the progression of bony maturity in both sexes (P < .05).
Odds Ratios for Osgood-Schlatter Disease by Bony Maturity Stage
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage C to stage A | 9.48 | 2.54-61.48 | <.001 |
| Stage A to stage E | 2.22 | 1.19-4.45 | .012 |
| Stage E to stage B | 1.02 | 0.44-2.12 | .945 |
Obtained by use of an age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis. A, apophyseal; B, bony; C, cartilage; E, epiphyseal.