Literature DB >> 31211375

Association between genetically predicted polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Holly R Harris1,2, Kara L Cushing-Haugen1, Penelope M Webb3,4, Christina M Nagle3,4, Susan J Jordan3,4, Harvey A Risch5, Mary Anne Rossing1,2, Jennifer A Doherty6, Marc T Goodman7,8, Francesmary Modugno9, Roberta B Ness10, Kirsten B Moysich11, Susanne K Kjær12,13, Estrid Høgdall12,14, Allan Jensen12, Joellen M Schildkraut15, Andrew Berchuck16, Daniel W Cramer17,18, Elisa V Bandera19, Lorna Rodriguez19, Nicolas Wentzensen20, Joanne Kotsopoulos21, Steven A Narod21, John R McLaughlin22, Hoda Anton-Culver23, Argyrios Ziogas23, Celeste L Pearce24,25, Anna H Wu25, Sara Lindström1,2, Kathryn L Terry17,18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrine disorder with an estimated prevalence of 4-21% in reproductive aged women. Recently, the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) reported a decreased risk of invasive ovarian cancer among women with self-reported PCOS. However, given the limitations of self-reported PCOS, the validity of these observed associations remains uncertain. Therefore, we sought to use Mendelian randomization with genetic markers as a proxy for PCOS, to examine the association between PCOS and ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Utilizing 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously associated with PCOS we assessed the association between genetically predicted PCOS and ovarian cancer risk, overall and by histotype, using summary statistics from a previously conducted genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer among European ancestry women within the OCAC (22 406 with invasive disease, 3103 with borderline disease and 40 941 controls).
RESULTS: An inverse association was observed between genetically predicted PCOS and invasive ovarian cancer risk: odds ratio (OR)=0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.85-0.99; P = 0.03]. When results were examined by histotype, the strongest inverse association was observed between genetically predicted PCOS and endometrioid tumors (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.65-0.92; P = 0.003). Adjustment for individual-level body mass index, oral contraceptive use and parity did not materially change the associations.
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence for a relationship between PCOS and reduced ovarian cancer risk, overall and among specific histotypes of invasive ovarian cancer. These results lend support to our previous observational study results. Future studies are needed to understand mechanisms underlying this association.
© The Author(s) 2019; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mendelian randomization; Polycystic ovary syndrome; histotype; ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31211375      PMCID: PMC6659359          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   9.685


  48 in total

1.  'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Positions statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an Androgen Excess Society guideline.

Authors:  Ricardo Azziz; Enrico Carmina; Didier Dewailly; Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis; Hector F Escobar-Morreale; Walter Futterweit; Onno E Janssen; Richard S Legro; Robert J Norman; Ann E Taylor; Selma F Witchel
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Polycystic ovary syndrome: chemical pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Morena Luigia Rocca; Roberta Venturella; Rita Mocciaro; Annalisa Di Cello; Angela Sacchinelli; Valentina Russo; Simona Trapasso; Fulvio Zullo; Michele Morelli
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.889

4.  Heritability of polycystic ovary syndrome in a Dutch twin-family study.

Authors:  J M Vink; S Sadrzadeh; C B Lambalk; D I Boomsma
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Genotype-phenotype correlations of PCOS susceptibility SNPs identified by GWAS in a large cohort of Han Chinese women.

Authors:  Linlin Cui; Han Zhao; Bo Zhang; Zhongyu Qu; Jiayin Liu; Xiaoyan Liang; Xiaoming Zhao; Junli Zhao; Yingpu Sun; Peng Wang; Tao Li; Yuhua Shi; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Obesity and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

Authors:  Catherine M Olsen; Christina M Nagle; David C Whiteman; Roberta Ness; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Malcolm C Pike; Mary Anne Rossing; Kathryn L Terry; Anna H Wu; Harvey A Risch; Herbert Yu; Jennifer A Doherty; Jenny Chang-Claude; Rebecca Hein; Stefan Nickels; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Marc T Goodman; Michael E Carney; Rayna K Matsuno; Galina Lurie; Kirsten Moysich; Susanne K Kjaer; Allan Jensen; Estrid Hogdall; Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Robert A Vierkant; Melissa C Larson; Joellen Schildkraut; Cathrine Hoyo; Patricia Moorman; Rachel P Weber; Daniel W Cramer; Allison F Vitonis; Elisa V Bandera; Sara H Olson; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Melony King; Louise A Brinton; Hannah Yang; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Jolanta Lissowska; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.678

7.  Epithelial ovarian cancer: testing the 'androgens hypothesis'.

Authors:  Catherine M Olsen; Adèle C Green; Christina M Nagle; Susan J Jordan; David C Whiteman; Christopher J Bain; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.678

8.  Adult body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer by subtype: a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Suzanne C Dixon; Christina M Nagle; Aaron P Thrift; Paul Dp Pharoah; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Wei Zheng; Jodie N Painter; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann; Diether Lambrechts; Ignace Vergote; Sandrina Lambrechts; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen; Mary Anne Rossing; Jennifer A Doherty; Kristine G Wicklund; Jenny Chang-Claude; Anja Rudolph; Kirsten B Moysich; Kunle Odunsi; Marc T Goodman; Lynne R Wilkens; Pamela J Thompson; Yurii B Shvetsov; Thilo Dörk; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Peter Hillemanns; Natalia Bogdanova; Ralf Butzow; Heli Nevanlinna; Liisa M Pelttari; Arto Leminen; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Robert P Edwards; Joseph L Kelley; Florian Heitz; Beth Y Karlan; Susanne K Kjær; Estrid Høgdall; Allan Jensen; Ellen L Goode; Brooke L Fridley; Julie M Cunningham; Stacey J Winham; Graham G Giles; Fiona Bruinsma; Roger L Milne; Melissa C Southey; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Xifeng Wu; Karen H Lu; Dong Liang; Douglas A Levine; Maria Bisogna; Joellen M Schildkraut; Andrew Berchuck; Daniel W Cramer; Kathryn L Terry; Elisa V Bandera; Sara H Olson; Helga B Salvesen; Liv Cecilie Thomsen; Reidun K Kopperud; Line Bjorge; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Leon F A G Massuger; Tanja Pejovic; Linda S Cook; Nhu D Le; Kenneth D Swenerton; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Linda E Kelemen; Jan Lubiński; Tomasz Huzarski; Jacek Gronwald; Janusz Menkiszak; Nicolas Wentzensen; Louise Brinton; Hannah Yang; Jolanta Lissowska; Claus K Høgdall; Lene Lundvall; Honglin Song; Jonathan P Tyrer; Ian Campbell; Diana Eccles; James Paul; Rosalind Glasspool; Nadeem Siddiqui; Alice S Whittemore; Weiva Sieh; Valerie McGuire; Joseph H Rothstein; Steven A Narod; Catherine Phelan; Harvey A Risch; John R McLaughlin; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Usha Menon; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Anna H Wu; Malcolm C Pike; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Agnieszka Budzilowska; Beata Spiewankiewicz; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 9.  Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Holly R Harris; Kathryn L Terry
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-05

10.  Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; George Davey Smith; Philip C Haycock; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

View more
  7 in total

1.  Commentary: Mendelian randomization and women's health.

Authors:  Jenny C Censin; Jonas Bovijn; Michael V Holmes; Cecilia M Lindgren
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Causes and Consequences of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Insights From Mendelian Randomization.

Authors:  Tiantian Zhu; Mark O Goodarzi
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.134

3.  Decreased risk of ovarian cancer associated with rs9898876 sex hormone-binding globulin gene variant.

Authors:  Sabrina Zidi; Mouna Stayoussef; Feryel K Sontini; Amel Mezlini; Besma Yacoubi-Loueslati; Wassim Y Almawi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Evaluation of Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Necati Hancerliogullari; Aytekin Tokmak; Meryem Kuru Pekcan; Aysegul Oksuzoglu; Tuba Candar; Yaprak Ustun
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-24

5.  The Genetic Association of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Hanxiao Chen; Yaoyao Zhang; Shangwei Li; Yuanzhi Tao; Rui Gao; Wenming Xu; Yihong Yang; Kemin Cheng; Yan Wang; Lang Qin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Genetically Predicted Cigarette Smoking in Relation to Risk of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Yingli Tao; Bin Liu; Ying Chen; Yiduoduo Hu; Rui Zhu; Ding Ye; Yingying Mao; Xiaohui Sun
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Markozannes; Afroditi Kanellopoulou; Olympia Dimopoulou; Dimitrios Kosmidis; Xiaomeng Zhang; Lijuan Wang; Evropi Theodoratou; Dipender Gill; Stephen Burgess; Konstantinos K Tsilidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 11.150

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.