James R Houston1, Natalie J Allen2, Maggie S Eppelheimer2, Jayapalli Rajiv Bapuraj3, Dipankar Biswas4, Philip A Allen5, Sarel J Vorster6, Mark G Luciano7, Francis Loth2,4. 1. Department of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan Health System, USA. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Akron, USA. 5. Department of Psychology, The University of Akron, USA. 6. Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Relatively little is known about the influence of individual difference variables on the presentation of macro-level brain morphology in type I Chiari malformation (CMI). The goal of the present study is to examine how case-control differences in Chiari are affected by patient sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient-provided magnetic resonance images were acquired through the Chiari 1000 database. Twenty-four morphometric measurements were taken using mid-sagittal images of 104 participants (26 male CMI, 26 female CMI, 26 male controls, and 26 female controls) using internally developed and validated custom software, Morphpro. Case-control comparisons were conducted separately by sex using healthy controls matched by age and body mass index. Probability-based t-tests, effect sizes (Cohen's d), and confidence intervals were used to compare case-control differences separately by sex. RESULTS: Male and female case-control comparisons yielded largely the same trends of CMI-related morphometric abnormalities. Both groups yielded reductions in posterior cranial fossa (PCF) structure heights. However, there was evidence for greater PCF structure height reductions in male CMI patients as measured by Cohen's d. CONCLUSIONS: Case-control differences indicated strong consistency in the morphometric abnormalities of CMI malformation in males and females. However, despite the higher prevalence rates of CMI in females, the results from the present study suggest that male morphometric abnormalities may be greater in magnitude. These findings also provide insight into the inconsistent findings from previous morphometric studies of CMI and emphasize the importance of controlling for individual differences when conducting case-control comparisons in CMI.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Relatively little is known about the influence of individual difference variables on the presentation of macro-level brain morphology in type I Chiari malformation (CMI). The goal of the present study is to examine how case-control differences in Chiari are affected by patient sex. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patient-provided magnetic resonance images were acquired through the Chiari 1000 database. Twenty-four morphometric measurements were taken using mid-sagittal images of 104 participants (26 male CMI, 26 female CMI, 26 male controls, and 26 female controls) using internally developed and validated custom software, Morphpro. Case-control comparisons were conducted separately by sex using healthy controls matched by age and body mass index. Probability-based t-tests, effect sizes (Cohen's d), and confidence intervals were used to compare case-control differences separately by sex. RESULTS: Male and female case-control comparisons yielded largely the same trends of CMI-related morphometric abnormalities. Both groups yielded reductions in posterior cranial fossa (PCF) structure heights. However, there was evidence for greater PCF structure height reductions in male CMI patients as measured by Cohen's d. CONCLUSIONS: Case-control differences indicated strong consistency in the morphometric abnormalities of CMI malformation in males and females. However, despite the higher prevalence rates of CMI in females, the results from the present study suggest that male morphometric abnormalities may be greater in magnitude. These findings also provide insight into the inconsistent findings from previous morphometric studies of CMI and emphasize the importance of controlling for individual differences when conducting case-control comparisons in CMI.
Authors: Maggie S Eppelheimer; Dipankar Biswas; Audrey M Braun; James R Houston; Philip A Allen; Jayapalli Rajiv Bapuraj; Richard Labuda; Dorothy M Loth; David Frim; Francis Loth Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Abhiraj D Bhimani; Darian R Esfahani; Steven Denyer; Ryan G Chiu; David Rosenberg; Ashley L Barks; Gregory D Arnone; Ankit I Mehta Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: David C Van Essen; Stephen M Smith; Deanna M Barch; Timothy E J Behrens; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Maggie S Eppelheimer; James R Houston; Jayapalli R Bapuraj; Richard Labuda; Dorothy M Loth; Audrey M Braun; Natalie J Allen; Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Dipankar Biswas; Aintzane Urbizu; Bryn A Martin; Cormac O Maher; Philip A Allen; Francis Loth Journal: Front Neuroanat Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 3.856
Authors: William H Shuman; Aislyn DiRisio; Alejandro Carrasquilla; Colin D Lamb; Addison Quinones; Aymeric Pionteck; Yang Yang; Mehmet Kurt; Raj K Shrivastava Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Mark Morkos; Maggie Eppelheimer; Blaise Simplice Talla Nwotchouang; Seyed Amir Ebrahimzadeh; Rafeeque A Bhadelia; Dorothy Loth; Philip A Allen; Francis Loth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 3.752