Literature DB >> 34710575

Are Two-Dimensional Morphometric Measures Reflective of Disease Severity in Adult Chiari I Malformation?

Sumit Thakar1, Vidyasagar Kanneganti2, Blaise Simplice Talla Nwotchouang3, Sara J Salem3, Maggie Eppelheimer4, Francis Loth5, Philip A Allen6, Saritha Aryan2, Alangar S Hegde2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional (2D) morphometric measures have been previously used to diagnose Chiari I malformation (CMI) and distinguish patients from healthy subjects. There is, however, a paucity of literature regarding whether morphometric differences exist across the range of CMI disease severity. We evaluated whether 2D morphometrics demonstrate significant changes across standardized grades of CMI severity in adults.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study comprised 76 patients with symptomatic CMI with or without syringomyelia. Patients matched for age, sex, and body mass index were selected from each of the 3 severity grades of the Chiari Severity Index (CSI). The study used 17 2D craniocervical and posterior fossa morphometric variables that were previously found to differentiate patients with CMI from healthy subjects. The measurements were performed on midsagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences using 2 custom in-house software tools, MorphPro and CerePro, and compared across CSI grades.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance showed that none of the 17 morphometric variables were significantly different across the 3 CSI grades (P > 0.003). Bayes factor 10 scores ranged from 0.11 to 0.82. Of variables, 9 had Bayes factor 10 scores between 0.10 and 0.30, while 8 had scores between 0.30 and 1. None of the Bayes factor 10 scores provided support for the alternative hypothesis that the morphometric measures differed across the CSI grades.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that 2D morphometrics are not reflective of CMI disease severity as indicated by the CSI grading system. The findings of our study support the need for further investigation into whether non-2D morphometric variables can be used as markers of disease severity.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiari I malformation; Chiari severity index; Disease severity; Morphometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34710575      PMCID: PMC8692430          DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  46 in total

1.  Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients.

Authors:  T H Milhorat; M W Chou; E M Trinidad; R W Kula; M Mandell; C Wolpert; M C Speer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Prognostic significance of C1-C2 facet malalignment after surgical decompression in adult Chiari malformation type I: a pilot study based on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale.

Authors:  Michael Lumintang Loe; Tito Vivas-Buitrago; Ricardo A Domingo; Johan Heemskerk; Shashwat Tripathi; Bernard R Bendok; Mohamad Bydon; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Kingsley Abode-Iyamah
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2020-10-16

3.  Machine learning applied to neuroimaging for diagnosis of adult classic Chiari malformation: role of the basion as a key morphometric indicator.

Authors:  Aintzane Urbizu; Bryn A Martin; Dulce Moncho; Alex Rovira; Maria A Poca; Juan Sahuquillo; Alfons Macaya; Malena I Español
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  External validation of current prediction systems of improvement after decompression surgery in Chiari malformation type I patients: can we do better?

Authors:  James Feghali; Yangyiran Xie; Yuxi Chen; Sean Li; Judy Huang
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Morphometric Analysis of Predictors of Cervical Syrinx Formation in the Setting of Chiari I Malformation.

Authors:  Kyle G Halvorson; Ryan T Kellogg; Krista N Keachie; Gerald A Grant; Carrie R Muh; Ben Waldau
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 1.162

6.  Predictive Factors of Headache Resolution After Chiari Type 1 Malformation Surgery.

Authors:  Lou Grangeon; Laurent Puy; Vianney Gilard; Benjamin Hebant; Olivier Langlois; Stephane Derrey; Emmanuel Gerardin; David Maltete; Evelyne Guegan-Massardier; Nicolas Magne
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Demographic confounders in volumetric MRI analysis: is the posterior fossa really small in the adult Chiari 1 malformation?

Authors:  Lauren A Roller; Beau B Bruce; Amit M Saindane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Significance of Modified Clivoaxial Angles in the Treatment of Adult Chiari Malformation Type I.

Authors:  Yunsen He; Tao Zheng; Bo Wu; Jiyang Wang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Differentiation between symptomatic Chiari I malformation and asymptomatic tonsilar ectopia by using cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging: initial estimate of imaging accuracy.

Authors:  Shawn K Hofkes; Bermans J Iskandar; Patrick A Turski; Lindell R Gentry; Jeremy B McCue; Victor M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Use of Morphometric Mapping to Characterise Symptomatic Chiari-Like Malformation, Secondary Syringomyelia and Associated Brachycephaly in the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.

Authors:  Susan P Knowler; Chloe Cross; Sandra Griffiths; Angus K McFadyen; Jelena Jovanovik; Anna Tauro; Zoha Kibar; Colin J Driver; Roberto M La Ragione; Clare Rusbridge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.