Hossein Azizi1, Behruz Asgari2, Thomas Skutella3. 1. Faculty of Biotechnology, Amol University of Special Modern Technologies, Amol, Iran.Electronic Address:h.azizi@ausmt.ac.ir. 2. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. 3. Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
It is well known that mouse spermatogonial stem cells
(SSCs) are unipotent stem cells, which express both
pluripotency and germ cell markers (1-3). SCCs are
capable of spontaneously transforming into pluripotent
embryonic stem (ES)-like cells under germ cell culture
conditions without the artificial addition of exogenous
pluripotency genes or small molecules (1, 4, 5). These
pluripotent ES-like cells in turn can convert into several
cell lineages including the three embryonic germ layers
and germ cells (1, 5-8).Kanatsu-Shinohara et al. (5), produced ES-like cells
within 4-7 weeks post-culture initiation in neonatal SSC
cultures for the first time, and were followed by other
groups, who showed that these pluripotent stem cells can
be derived from the murine testis cells from up to 7-week
old adolescent mice (1, 5). In the study by Kanatsu-
Shinohara et al. (5), the ES-like cells played an active part
in their transformation into germline chimeras following
injection into blastocysts. These findings demonstrated
the pluripotency of SSCs or neonatal testis-derived
gonocytes; however, the derivation processes of ES-like
cells from SSCs remained unclear. Other more studies
have successfully generated different populations of
Stra8-positive, GPR125-positive and Oct4-positive SSCs
from ES-like cells (4, 6, 7). In a study by Guan et al. (7)
multipotent ES-like cells could be derived from Stra8-
positive SSCs from 7 week old mice, in vitro. Similar to
the study by Kanatsu-Shinohara et al. (5) under in vitro and
in vivo conditions, these cells could differentiate into all
three germ layers in vitro and produced teratomas. After
injection of Stra8-positive SSCs into blastocysts chimeras
was formed (7). After mating, the chimera transmission to
the next generation was observed. Germline transmission
of Stra8-GFP-positive ES-like cells was not evaluated.
Ko et al. (4) repeated the induction of pluripotency in 5-7
weeks Oct-4-GFP-positive adolescent SSCs. The authors
described that the induction of differentiation dependends
on the initial number of plated SSCs and the length of
Oct4-positive cell culturing time without splitting. They
manually picked the heterogonous Oct4-GFP-positive
SSCs and demonstrated the relation between a certain
number of SSCs (1000-4000) and a culture duration of 2-4 weeks for the induction of pluripotency. In a published
protocol, this group described the conversion of SSCs
into pluripotent stem cells only with SSCs of adolescent
mice from postnatal day 35 (5 weeks old). The generated
cells fulfilled the same criteria described by Kanatsu-
Shinohara et al. (5) and Guan et al. (7). In another study
this group generated ES-like cells from unselected testis
cells of a testis biopsy (9). Seandel et al. (6) produced
adult spermatogonial-derived stem cells from GPR-125
LacZ-positive cells in 3-week to 8-month old mice, but
these cells were only multipotent, because no germline
transmission was observed in the chimera.Although we have not come to a complete
understanding of the reprogramming mechanism and the
establishment of ES-like cells from SSCs, it is obvious
that the reprogramming process is influenced by various
conditions. These include the age of the donor animals the
SSC plating density, the time period post-culture initiation,
the culture duration, and the cell population variations
observed while in culture (1, 5, 7, 10). Furthermore, during
conversion to pluripotent cells different types of colonies
can be observed, including ES-like cells, epiblast-like
cells and semi-transmitted transitional colonies (1, 6, 7).In the current study, the multipotency or pluripotency
potentials of testis-derived ES-like cells, epiblast-like
cells and transitional colonies were examined by using
molecular characterizations and chimera assays in
comparison to ESCs.
Materials and Methods
Isolation of embryonic stem-like cells, epiblast-like
cells and transitional colonies
All animal care was performed according to guidelines
of the Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology of
Heidelberg University (Heidelberg, Germany) and the
Royan Institutional Review Board and Institutional
Ethical Committee (Tehran, Iran). Testis cells were
isolated from 4-week old C57BL/6 Oct4-promoter
reporter GFP transgenic mice after decapsulation and
treatment by a one-step enzymatic digestion protocol.
Germline stem cells (GSCs) were established according
to our previous study (1). The above-mentioned produced
colonies were sub-cultured in mouse ES cell medium with
KnockOut™ Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (KODMEM)
or DMEM high-glucose medium (Invitrogen,
USA), supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum
(FBS, Invitrogen, USA), 1% Non-Essential Amino Acid
(NEAA) solution (Invitrogen, USA), 1% L-glutamine
(Invitrogen, USA), 1% Pen-Strep (PAA) (Invitrogen,
USA), 0 .1% β-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen, USA) and
leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF, Millipore, USA) at a final
concentration of 1000 U/ml (1).
Fluidigm biomark system gene expression analyses
The expression of various pluripotency- and germ cellassociated
genes Oct4, Nanog, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc, Lin28,
Gdf3, Tdgf1, Dppa-5, Stra8 and Gpr-125 was analyzed
utilizing dynamic array chips (Table 1). The housekeeping
gene, Gapdh, was selected for normalization of data in
different cultured cell types, including ESCs, ES-like
cells, epiblast-like cells and transitional colonies. The
expression fold change of mRNA was compared to mouse
embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) feeder cells as an additional
control. With the help of a micromanipulator (Narashige
Instruments) about 50 cells were manually selected from
each sample. Afterwards, the selected cells were lysed with
a special lysis buffer containing 9 μl RT-PreAmp Master
Mix (5.0 μl Cells Direct 2× Reaction Mix) (Invitrogen,
USA), 2.5 μl 0.2× assay pool, 0.2 μl RT/Taq Superscript
III (Invitrogen, USA) and 1.3 μl TE buffer and directly
frozen and stored at -80˚C. The targeted transcripts were
quantified with TaqMan real-time PCR on the BioMark
real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) system (Fluidigm,
USA), with TaqMan gene expression assays (Invitrogen,
USA) in 48.48 dynamic arrays. Two technical replicates
were processed to analyze every sample. The CT values
were analysed with GenEx software from MultiD, Excel
and SPSS (1, 3, 11).
Table 1
List of the TaqMan gene expression assays for multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR)
Gene
Gene name
Species
Assay ID
Dazl
Deleted in azoospermia-like
Mouse
Mm00515630_m1
Ddx4 or Vasa
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 4
Mouse
Mm00802445_m1
Zbtb16 or Plzf
Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16
Mouse
Mm01176868_m1
Stra-8
Stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8
Mouse
Mm01165142_m1
Nanog
Nanog homeobox
Mouse
Mm02384862_g1
Lin28a
Lin-28 homolog A (C. elegans)
Mouse
Mm00524077_m1
Tdgf1
Teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1
Mouse
Mm00783944_g1
Dppa5
Developmental pluripotency associated 5
Mouse
Mm01171664_g1
Gdf3
Growth differentiation factor 3
Mouse
Mm00433563_m1
Pou5f1 or Oct-4
POU domain, class 5, transcription factor 1
Mouse
Mm03053917_g1
Sox2
SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2
Mouse
Mm00488369_s1
Gapdh
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Mouse
Mm99999915_g1
Immunocytofluorescent staining
For immunocytochemistry each cell type was cultured
in 24-well plates and fixated in 4% paraformaldehyde.
After rinsing, the samples were permeabilized with
0.1% Triton/phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Sigma,
USA) and unspecific staining sites were blocked with
1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS. The cells
were incubated overnight with primary antibodies for
Nanog (Abcam, USA) and Klf4 (Cell Signaling, USA).
After rinsing several times with PBS, the cells were
incubated with species-specific secondary antibodies
conjugated to different fluorochromes. Afterwards, the
stained cells were counterstained with DAPI (0.2 μg/
ml 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Sigma, USA) for
3 minutes at room temperature and fixed with Mowiol
4-88 reagent (Sigma, USA). As a negative control for
all antibodies, the omission of each primary antibody
in the sample was performed. The labeled cells were
examined with a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM
700) and images were obtained using a Zeiss LSMTPMT
(1, 2).
Production of chimeric mice
The differentiation potentials of ES cells and ESlike
cells in vivo was examined utilizing chimera
generation. At 3.5 days post-coitus, blastocysts were
harvested from super-ovulated female mice and
placed in M2 medium. Subsequently, 10-15 single-cell
colonies were transferred into each blastocyst. About
10 injected embryos were surgically transplanted into
the uterine horns of pseudo-pregnant recipient female
mice. The coat color of the chimera mice was used for
their identification (1).List of the TaqMan gene expression assays for multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR)
Statistical analysis
The experiments were repeated at least three
times. The average gene expression in each group
was quantified, and One-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc tests was
employed to evaluate the experimental results.
Results
Characterization of embryonic stem-like cells,
epiblast-like cells and transitional colonies
The characterization of the GSCs was established as
described in our previous study (1). During passages of
GSCs, we rarely found colonies which were similar to
mouse ESCs that expressed high levels of Oct4-GFP,
transitional colonies with partial expression of Oct4-
GFP, or and epiblast-like cells without expression
of Oct4-GFP. About two months after initiation of
GSC cultivation, according to morphological criteria
and the re-occurring Oct4-GFP reporter signal, ESlike
colonies, epiblast-like colonies and transitional
colonies were observed (Fig .1).
Fig.1
Different types of colonies are observed in spermatogonial stem
cells (SSCs) cultures. Cell morphology and Oct4-GFP signals in A1. ESlike
colonies, B1. Epiblast-like cells, C1. Transitional colonies, A2, B2,
and C2. Show expression level of Oct4-GFP in the related cells (scale
bar: 100 μm).
The ES-like colonies had a packed spindle- to
round-shaped morphology with smooth borders and
expressed the Oct4-GFP signal at a very high intensity
throughout the whole area of the colonies (Fig .1A).
In contrast, the epiblast-like cell colonies had a flat
morphology with no expression of Oct4-GFP (Fig .1B).
The transitional cell colonies were characterized by
a jagged, irregular or uneven border with a partial
expression of Oct4-GFP in some areas of the colonies
(Fig .1C).Different types of colonies are observed in spermatogonial stem
cells (SSCs) cultures. Cell morphology and Oct4-GFP signals in A1. ESlike
colonies, B1. Epiblast-like cells, C1. Transitional colonies, A2, B2,
and C2. Show expression level of Oct4-GFP in the related cells (scale
bar: 100 μm).In the next step, we examined the expression of
pluripotency markers with Fluidigm RT-PCR for the
ES cells, the ES-like, epiblast-like, and transitional
colonies (Fig .2). The germ cell markers Stra8 and
Gpr125 were expressed more strongly in the ESlike
cells compared to any other group (P<0.05,
Fig .2). Furthermore, higher expression levels of
the pluripotency genes Klf4, Gdf3 and Lin28 were
observed in ES-like cells and ESCs in comparison
to the epiblast-like and transitional colonies (Fig .2).
We also observed a significantly higher expression
of Tdgf1 in ESCs in comparison to the other groups
(P<0.05, Fig .2). While the expression of Dppa5 in the
ES-like cells was significantly higher than in the other
groups, we did not observe any significant difference
in the expression of Oct4, Nanog, Sox2 and c-Myc
among the groups (Fig .2).
Fig.2
mRNA expression of pluripotency and germ cell genes. Analysis was performed
comparing embryonic stem cells (ESCs), ES-like colonies, epiblast-like cells (EP)
and transitional colonies (TR). Y-axis denotes fold change of mRNA expression
in comparison to MEF feeder cells. Significance of the difference between the
different groups was determined with t test. a; At least P<0.05 versus other groups,
b; At least P<0.05 versus EP and TR cells, and MEF; Mouse embryonic fibroblasts.
Furthermore, by immunocytochemistry we detected
Oct4-GFP positive cells in the ES-like colonies that
were strongly stained for Nanog (Fig .3A1-3), and
KLF4 (Fig .3, Fig B1-3), while the transitional colonies
only partially expressed Oct4-GFP and Nanog. Similar
to the ES-like cells, in the transitional colonies there
were areas that were partially positive for both Oct4-
GFP and KLF4 (Fig .3).
Fig.3
Immunocytochemical characterization of reprogrammed embryonic stem (ES)-like and transitional colonies. A1-A3. Oct4-GFP positive cells in the ES-like colonies are
positive for the markers of Nanog, B1-B3. Klf4, while transitional colonies partially express Oct4-GFP signal, C1-C3. Nanog, and D1-D3. KLF4 (scale bar: 50 μm).
mRNA expression of pluripotency and germ cell genes. Analysis was performed
comparing embryonic stem cells (ESCs), ES-like colonies, epiblast-like cells (EP)
and transitional colonies (TR). Y-axis denotes fold change of mRNA expression
in comparison to MEF feeder cells. Significance of the difference between the
different groups was determined with t test. a; At least P<0.05 versus other groups,
b; At least P<0.05 versus EP and TR cells, and MEF; Mouse embryonic fibroblasts.
Chimeric mice production
In an additional experiment, we investigated the efficiency
of the generation of chimeric mice with blastocyst injection of
mouse ESCs and ES-like cells. We injected 164 embryos with
ESCs and 169 embryos with ES-like cells that differentiated
into blastocysts, which were implanted into a foster mother.
We observed after embryo transfer 86 live births from
ESCs and 41 from the ES-like group. The efficiency of the
production of chimeric mice with ESCs was more efficient
than the ES-like cells. Overall, 51 (59.3%) chimeric mice
were generated after injection of ESCs and 9 (22%) chimeras
from ES-like cells.Immunocytochemical characterization of reprogrammed embryonic stem (ES)-like and transitional colonies. A1-A3. Oct4-GFP positive cells in the ES-like colonies are
positive for the markers of Nanog, B1-B3. Klf4, while transitional colonies partially express Oct4-GFP signal, C1-C3. Nanog, and D1-D3. KLF4 (scale bar: 50 μm).
Discussion
In our study we demonstrated that ES-like, epiblast-like
and transitional colonies all emerge during the conversion
stage of unipotent GSCs into pluripotent cells, but only
ES-like cells possess pluripotent stem cell potentials.
Epiblast-like colonies are Oct4-GFP negative and are
unable to shift to a pluripotent state. Transitional colonies
are heterogeneous with only a partial expression of
pluripotency genes. Only the strongly Oct4-GFP positive
ES-like cells expressed a full network of pluripotency
genes and contributed to the chimera assays. On the other
hand, and in contrast to ESCs, the ES-like cells in parallel
still strongly express the germ cell specific genes Stra-8
and Gpr-125.It is well documented that the transcriptional factor
network of Oct-4, Nanog and Sox2 controls the pluripotency state in ESCs and is essential for the
reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent
stem cells (IPSCs) (12). This network blocks the expression
of different lineage-specific genes and thus sustains
pluripotency of the cells, preventing their differentiation
(13). The level of expression of pluripotency gene is
critical for the maintenance of pluripotency state (3, 14).
In the colonies from the Oct4-GFP reporter mice, the
GFP signal was strongly present only in the ES-like cells
and partially in the transitional colonies. We confirmed
that the expression of the pluripotency markers Nanog,
and C-Myc in ES-like, transitional and epiblast-like cells
was at similar levels in comparison to ESCs, while Sox2
was only strongly expressed in mouse ESCs. Our study
also demonstrated partial and low expression levels of
Lin28 and Klf4 in transitional and epiblast-like cells. The
mRNA expression profiling confirmed that the expression
levels of pluripotency markers were not the same, and
significant differences were detected even between mouse
ESCs and ES-like cells.It has been suggested that the Oct4 protein, encoded
by the Pou5f1 gene, is absolutely required for the
stemness properties of ESCs. During early embryonic
development, Oct4 is expressed in blastomeres and in
the inner cell mass (ICM) of the blastocysts, from which
ESCs are derived in vitro (15, 16). After gastrulation,
the Oct4 protein is down-regulated in the trophectoderm
and in the primitive endoderm, but is maintained in
primordial germ cells (PGCs). PGCs continue to express
of Oct4 until the initiation of spermatogenesis in males
or oogenesis in females (16). In concert with Oct4 and
Sox2, the transcription factor Nanog is a key factor to
establish ESC identity and to maintain pluripotency.
Nanog seems to maintain self-renewal in mouse ESCs
with an independent mechanism of the leukemia
inhibitor factor (LIF)/signal transducer and activator of
transcription 3 (Stat3) signalling pathway. The deletion of
Nanog in mouse ESCs leads to a loss of the pluripotency
state and induces differentiation into the extra-embryonic
endoderm cell lineage (17). It has been shown that SSCs
express all of the different Yamanaka factors (Oct3/4,
Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc) at the mRNA level (11, 18), while
mRNA for Sox2 is not translated into a protein (19). It
has been documented that blastocysts with a deficiency in
Sox2 lose their pluripotent state, therefore are unable to
shape a pluripotent ICM (20). Klf4 has also been shown
to be an important transcription factor for the regulation of
pluripotency in cells (21). Klf4 accompanied by the genes
Oct4, Sox2 and c-Myc, is the main transcription factor for
the generation of iPSCs from somatic cells (21, 22). Lin28
is a marker of ESCs and is expressed in undifferentiated
mouse SSCs (23). Gillis et al. (24) reported that Lin28
might not be present in adult human testes, but they
observed a high expression in human testicular germ cell
tumors. We reported significantly high expression levels
of Lin28 in mouse ES-like cells and ESCs compared to
both epiblast-like and transitional cells.There are diverse controversial challenges about the
pluripotency and multipotency of ES-like cells (25-
28), including germ cell contribution and germ cell
transmission.Although it seems that ES-like cells from 4-week
old Oct4-promoter reporter GFP transgenic mice have
pluripotency potentials, in our experiments the efficiency
for the production of chimeric mice from ESCs and ESlike
cells was different. Our analysis showed that although
chimeric mice could be generated in 22% of the cases after
injection of ES-like cells into blastocysts, the efficiency to
produce chimeric mice was lower than that after injection
of ESCs (59%). Therefore, although ES-like cells express
pluripotency markers and produce chimera, the degree of
chimerism is not the same as the mouse ESCs.In previous studies, Kanatsu-Shinohara et al. (5)
microinjected ES-like cells from neonatal mice into
blastocysts and observed chimerism in 36% (13 of 36) of
the newborn animals as judged by EGFP-positive cells.
According to their findings, donor cells were found in
the central nervous system, liver, heart, lung, somites,
intestine, and also in the germ cells in the testis of a 6-week
old animal. Two offspring were obtained after performing
microinsemination with EGFP-positive spermatids. By
using the tetraploid complementation technique embryos,
this group could generate embryos but no living offspring.
This observation was explained by the altered imprinting
status of the germ stem cells in comparison to mouse ES
cells. Guan et al. (7) microinjected blastocysts with SSCs
from 4 week old mice and detected chimaerism in 39 of
42 of mice (93%). After mating of chimeric males and
females, these authors observed germline transmission.
Furthermore, Ko et al. (4) performed chimera assays and
observed germline transmission with mES-like cells at a
lower level than with mouse ES cells.Seandel et al. (6) generated GPR125 positive multipotent
ES-like cells, which contributed to all three germ layers
in embryoid body (EB) cultures and teratoma assays,
but did not show germline transmission in chimeric
embryos. Naive and prime pluripotency states have
been demonstrated in pluripotent cells (29-32). Primary
pluripotent stem cells, similar to late epiblast cells or postimplantation
epiblast cells, could only produce chimeric
animals to a limited extent (30). Therefore, it might be
argued that the ES-like cells generated by Seandel et al.
(6) were primary pluripotent cells (7).To better understand the origin of the pluripotent stem
cells, Guan et al. (33) generated ES-like cells from Stra8-
GFP mice, while Seandel et al. (6) utilized GPR125
LacZ mice. However, the resulting cell lines were not
from an initial germ cell population grown from a single
cell (clonal growth) and from an ideal ES morphology
(transitional morphology for Seandel) (4). Ko et al. (4)
described clonal generation of ES-like cells, but the
source of SSCs is unclear, because at a closer look Oct4-
GFP SSCs lose the fluorescent signal after an initial germ
cell culture (1, 4). Therefore, the ES-like cells, in which a
strong GFP signal re-occurs, might have been generated from different types of SSCs or even other cells. In the
past years, the enhancement of ES-like cell production
by certain chemicals has been proven. The derivation of
pluripotent ES-like cells could be expanded by glycogen
synthase kinase-3 inhibition in neonate mouse testicular
cultures (28).
Conclusion
During the culture of mouse testicular GSCs
from 4-7 week old mice, different types of colonies
are spontaneously generated, while only ES-like
colonies are able to reach a full pluripotent state. The
different types of colonies can be distinguished by
morphological criteria. Only ES-like and transitional
colonies show Oc4-GFP reporter signals, “epiblast
like” colonies are Oct4-GFP negative. In contrast to
ESCs, Oct4-GFP positive ES-like cells still express the
germ cell specific genes Stra8 and GPR125, indicating
that the Oct4-GFP positive ES-like cells maintaine
their original epigenetic "germ cell memory". The
remaining epigenetic germ cell-associated traces have
to be further researched in the future. This observation
might also be interesting for the generation of germ
cells from pluripotent ES-like cells. The efficiency to
produce chimeric mice was more efficient with mouse
ESCs in comparison to ES-like cells. Further research
of chimeric mouse production by ES-like cells has to
be conducted in higher numbers, while analyzing the
potency of these cells for germline transmission in
more detail.
Authors: Laurie A Boyer; Tong Ihn Lee; Megan F Cole; Sarah E Johnstone; Stuart S Levine; Jacob P Zucker; Matthew G Guenther; Roshan M Kumar; Heather L Murray; Richard G Jenner; David K Gifford; Douglas A Melton; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A Young Journal: Cell Date: 2005-09-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Marco Seandel; Daylon James; Sergey V Shmelkov; Ilaria Falciatori; Jiyeon Kim; Sai Chavala; Douglas S Scherr; Fan Zhang; Richard Torres; Nicholas W Gale; George D Yancopoulos; Andrew Murphy; David M Valenzuela; Robin M Hobbs; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Shahin Rafii Journal: Nature Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 49.962