Samira Seyyed Anvari1, G Holamreza Dehgan2, Mazdak Razi3. 1. Department of Biology, Collage of Post Graduate, Ahar Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran. 2. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Natural Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. 3. Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.Electronic Address:mazdak.razi@gmail.com.
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is an exceptionally
common disorder, which is widely observed in
premenopausal women. It is characterized by an increased
serum level of androgens (hyperandrogenism), chronic
anovulation and presence of the polycystic ovarian
morphology (1). According to the Rotterdam consensus
in 2003, chronic anovulation or oligomenorrhea, clinical
or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovarian
morphology are declared as main criteria for PCOS (2).
Among the different mentioned phenotypes, ovarian
hyperandrogenism has gained higher attenuations. Indeed,
in PCOS, an intrinsic steroidogenic defect of theca cells
results in ovarian hyperandrogenism. Accordingly,
increased LH and enhanced insulin levels amplify
inherent impairment of steroidogenesis in theca cells
(3). In addition to hyperandrogenism symptoms, follicle
stimulating (FSH) and luteinizing (LH) hormones up-
regulation, as well as estrogen and progesterone reduction
levels have been reported in PCOS patients (3, 4). Estrogen
interacts with two distinct estrogen receptors (ERs),
namely ERa and ERß (5), both of which regulate variety
of genes expression, leading to cellular proliferation
and differentiation in both male and female gonads (6).
In rodents, Erα
is expressed exclusively in theca cells,
whereas Erß
is expressed especially in granulosa cells
(GCs) (7). Several evidences, including failed follicular
maturation, anovulation and hemorrhagic cysts formation
are reported for Erα
knockout (aERKO) mice ovaries (8,
9). The Erß-related phenotypes are partially different from
those related to Erα. Actually, Erß
knockout (ßERKO)
mice ovaries appear normal, exhibiting follicles at all
stages of development. Meanwhile, these mice represent
fewer corpora lutea, resulting in mild subfertility problems.
Moreover, failed response to exogenous gonadotropins as
well as a severe deficiency in response to the LH/human
chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) ovulatory stimulus have
been reported in ßERKO mice ovaries (5).In addition to estrogen and ERs,
the proto-oncogene cellular myc (c-
Myc), as a transcription factor, participates in cellular
proliferation pathway (10). Although c-Myc protein has
been illustrated to induce both growth and oncogenic
properties, very early studies have shown its pro-apoptotic
characteristic in ovarian tissue. c-Myc is expressed in GCs
at all stages of follicular development and in oocyte of
primordial follicles, suggesting its role in remodeling the
ovarian local tissue following atresia and luteolysis (11).
Meanwhile, the massive expression of c-Myc protein
in GCs and theca interna of atretic follicles, as well as
peripheral theca lutein cells implies the pro-apoptotic
characteristic of c-Myc in ovaries (12).According to the previous reports, PCOS is frequently
associated with oxidative stress. Various investigations
have shown remarkable enhancement in circulating
malondialdehyde (MDA) as well as significant reduction
in serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione
peroxidase (GSH-px) of patients with PCOS (13,
14). Indeed, there is a positive correlation between
obesity, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenemia, chronic
inflammation and oxidative stress in PCOS ovaries (15).
Therefore, the impressively-induced oxidative stress
is considered as a potential inducer of PCOS-related
pathogenesis (13).Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or autologous platelet gel,
has gained high attentions in musculoskeletal medicine,
hemostasis and wound healing, inhibiting immune
reactions, aesthetic plastic surgery (16), spinal fusion (17)
and heart bypass surgery (18), in addition to treatment
of chronic skin and soft-tissue ulcers (19). a-granules of
platelets are comprised of numerous proteins, including
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming
growth factor (TGF)-ß, platelet factor 4 (PF4), interleukin
(IL)-1, platelet-derived angiogenesis factor (PDAF),
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal
growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived endothelial growth
factor (PDEGF), epithelial cell growth factor (ECGF)
insulin-like growth factor (IGF), osteocalcin, osteonectin,
fibrinogen, vitronectin, fibronectin, and thrombospondin
(TSP)-1 (16). Further studies have shown promoting
effect of PRP in different therapeutic innervations (20).Minding the essential role of growth hormones in both
early and late folliculogenesis and in initiating oocyte
growth, as well as cell proliferation and inhibiting
apoptosis (especially at later stages of development),
this question arises what the possible effect of PRP-
related growth factors on different molecular elements
is, in PCOS-induced ovaries. Therefore, here we aimed
to uncover the possible ameliorative effect of PRP on
hyperandrogenic PCOS-induced derangements in ovarian
tissue. The possible PRP-related ameliorative effects were
assessed in five well-established categories, including:
i. Alterations at gonadotropins, androgens, estrogen
and progesterone levels, ii. Changes in expression of
Erα and Erß (as important receptors participating in
folliculogenesis), iii. Alteration in c-Myc expression (as
important proto-oncogene involved in cell proliferation/
apoptosis), iv. Ovarian antioxidant status, and finally v.
Follicular atresia and/or growth ratio.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and materials
Specific commercial kits were purchased for analysis
of rat testosterone (Mybiosource, USA), androstenedione
(Mybiosource, USA), estrogen (Bio Vender, Czech
Republic), progesterone (Crystal Chem, USA), LH
(Mybiosource, USA), FSH (Bio Vender, Japan). Primary
antibodies were provided for Erα, Erß and c-Myc (Rabbit-
Antimouse Erα, Erß and c-Myc; Biocare, USA). Commercial
kits for SOD and GSH-px were obtained from RANDOX
reagents company (Germany). All other chemical agents
were commercial products of analytical grade.
Animals, PCOS induction and experimental design
The current experimental study was performed on
animal models. To conduct it, 30 immature (21 days
old) female Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned into five
groups (six rats in each group), including control (sampled
after 30 days), PCOS-induced (sampled 15 and 30 days
of post PCOS induction) and PRP auto-located PCOS-
induced (sampled 15 and 30 days of post PCOS induction)
groups. The animals were given ad libitum access to
food and water, kept at room temperature (21-23oC) on
a 12:12 light:dark cycle. The hyperandrogenic PCOS-
like condition was induced based on the previous study
by Honnma et al. (21). Briefly, dehydroepiandrosterone
(DHEA, 6 mg/100 g body weight/0.2 ml sesame oil)
was subcutaneously injected to 22 days old rats, every
evening for 15 days. The animals in the control group
were received 0.2 ml sesame oil every evening for the
corresponding length of time. Extra cares were taken and
no inflammatory reaction was observed at the injected
site, during the trial (Fig .1). All experimental protocols
were approved and monitored by the Ethical Committee
in Animal Experimentation of Urmia University (Urmia,
Iran).
Fig.1
Summarized schematic diagram for animals platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation, activation, auto-location and animal grouping of the study. A.
Blood sampling from caudal vena cava, B. PRP preparation, and C. PRP auto-location.
Platelet-rich plasma preparation, activation and count
To perform the experimental procedures and PRP
preparation, the animals were anesthetized through
intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (6 mg/kg, Trittau,
Germany) and ketamine (70 mg/kg, Alfason-Woerden,
Netherland). Next, the cannulation of caudal vena cava
was submitted. 5 ml disposable syringe containing 0.35
ml of 10% sodium citrate was used to collect 3.15 ml
PRP of each animal. The blood samples were kept in 5 ml
sterile silicone vacuum tubes. In order to replace the same
amount of blood, sterile saline was immediately injected.
PRP preparation was carried out based on the proposed
protocol by Messora et al. (22). Briefly, the collected
blood samples were firstly centrifuged (Beckman J-6M,
UK) at 160 rpm, 22°C for 20 minutes. Then, red blood
cell component (lower fraction) and serum component,
as an upper straw-yellow turbid fraction, were observed.
Thereafter, a point was marked at 1.4 mm below the line
dividing two fractions. All contents above the marked
point were pipetted and transferred to another 5 ml vacuum
tube. The sample was then centrifuged at 400 rpm, for 15
minutes, resulting in two components, including platelet-
poor plasma (PPP) and PRP in the bellow part (Fig .1A,
B). Next, similar amounts of PRP and PPP (0.35 ml)
were pipetted and transferred to different sterile dappen
dishes. After that, they were activated by adding 0.05 ml
of 10% calcium chloride solution to each 1 ml of PRP or
PPP. Finally, the platelets were manually counted (8.08
± 3.24×106/µl) using the Neubauer chamber, through
Olympus optical microscope (CH-2, Japan), at ×40
magnification objective lens.
Auto-location of platelet-rich plasma
Following PCOS induction, PRPs were collected and
activated as previously described and subsequently
1.00×106/µl PRPs were auto-located from each animal
into the mesovarian enclosed to ovaries (Fig .1C).
Histological analyses
At the end of experiment, light anesthesia was induced to
animals using 5% ketamine (40 mg/kg) in addition to 2%
xylazine (5 mg/kg), intraperitoneally and then euthanized
by especial CO2 device (ADACO, Iran). Next, the ovarian
tissues were dissected out and fixed in 10% formalin for 72
hours. Routine sample processing was performed using
ascending alcohol and the samples were then embedded
in paraffin. Thereafter, serial sections were prepared by
rotary microtome (Leitz Wetzlar, Germany) and stained
with hematoxylin-eosin. To perform histomorphometric
analyses, follicles were classified to preantral and antral
types. Follicles with intact/complete layers of GCs and
theca cells, ordinary cytoplasm of oocyte and intact nuclei
were considered as normal/intact follicles. Follicles with
GC dissociation, early antrum formation, luteinized
elongated GCs were considered as atretic types. The
atretic preantral and antral follicles were counted in serial
sections for each sample and compared between groups.
Analyses of RNA damage
Darzynkiewicz method was considered to assess the
RNAdamage (23). In brief, ether alcohol was used to wash
the ovaries and thereafter, 10 µm sections were obtained
using cryostat microtome (Huntingdom, UK). Different
degrees of ethanol were used to fix the sections. Next, the
sections were rinsed in acetic acid (1%) and washed in
distilled water. The slides were stained in acridine-orange
(3-5 minutes) and then counterstained in phosphate buffer
(pH=6.85, 2 minutes). Finally, the fluorescent colors
differentiation was induced by calcium chloride. The
follicular cells with RNA damage were characterized with
loss and/or faint red stained RNA. The normal cells were
marked with bright red fluorescent RNA.
Immunohistochemical staining
Tissue slides were heated at 60°C (25 minutes) in
a hot-air oven (Venticell, Germany). Tissue sections
were then dewaxed in xylene (2 changes, each
change 5 minutes) and rehydrated. Following antigen
retrieval process (in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer), the
immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was conducted
based on the manufacturer’s protocol (Biocare, USA).
Briefly, endogenous peroxidases were blocked by
0.03% hydrogen peroxide containing sodium acid. The
sections were washed gently and thereafter, incubated
with Erα (1:500), Erß (1:600) and c-Myc (1:500)
biotinylated primary antibodies in 4oC, overnight. The
slides were then rinsed gently with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) and placed in a humidified chamber
with a sufficient amount of streptavidin conjugated
to horseradish peroxidase in PBS, containing an antimicrobial
agent, for 15 minutes. Next, DAB chromogen
was used to mark target proteins. Counterstaining was
conducted by hematoxylin. Finally, the sections were
dipped in ammonia (0.037 ml), rinsed in distilled water
and coverslipped. The positive immunohistochemical
reaction was visualized as brown.Summarized schematic diagram for animals platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation, activation, auto-location and animal grouping of the study. A.
Blood sampling from caudal vena cava, B. PRP preparation, and C. PRP auto-location.
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Previously collected and stored (-70°C) ovaries were
used for total RNA extraction, based on the standard
TRIZOL method (24). In brief, 20-30 mg of ovarian tissue
from individual animal of each group was homogenized
in 1 ml of TRIZOL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and
the colorless aqueous phase was collected. The extra care
was taken in order to avoid genomic DNA contamination.
The amount of total RNA was determined using nanodrop
spectrophotometer (260 nm and A260/280 ratio=1.8-2.0),
and thereafter the samples were stored at -70°C. For
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR),
cDNA was synthesized in a 20 µl reaction mixture
containing 1 µg total RNA, oligo (dT) primer (1 µl),
5×reaction buffer (4 µl), RNase inhibitor (1 µl), 10 mM
dNTP mix (2 µl), M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (1 µl)
according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Fermentas,
Germany). Cycling protocol for 20 µl reaction mix was
performed for 5 minutes at 65°C, followed by 60 minutes
at 42°C, and 5 minutes at 70°C to terminate the reaction.
PCR reaction was carried out in a total volume of 27
µl containing PCR master mix (13 µl), FWD and REV
specific primers (each 1 µl), and cDNA as a template (1.5
µl) and nuclease free water (10.5 µl). The PCR conditions
were run as follows: one cycle of general denaturation at
95°C for 3 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for
20 seconds, annealing temperature (50°C for c-Myc, 62°C
for Erα, 58°C for Erß
and finally 60°C for ß-Actin) for
60 seconds and elongation at 72°C for 1 minute, before
terminating cycle at 72°C for 5 minutes (25, 26). Specific
primers were designed and manufactured by Cinna-Gen
company (Iran). Primers pair sequences, for individual
genes are presented in Table 1.
Determination of ovarian TAC, MDA, SOD and GSHpx
contents
In order to analyze ovarian antioxidant capacity, the
tissues were washed three times with 0.9% NaCl solution,
and using Teflon-end-on homogenizator (Elvenjempotter,
USA), each ovary tissue was homogenized in 9 ml
of 1.15% KCl. Thereafter, the homogenates were
centrifuged at 4000 rpm. MDA content was next
measured based on the thiobarbituric acid (TBA)
reaction and the sample absorbance ratios were
measured and recorded at 532 nm (27). Ovarian
activities of SOD and GSH-px were analyzed using
the commercial measurement kits of RAN-SOD and
RAN-SOL (Rodex, Germany) and the absorbance ratio
of samples were measured and recorded at 340 nm.
Ovarian TAC status was also evaluated based on the
ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay and
the absorbance of samples was measured and recorded
at 593 nm (28). Finally, the ovarian protein contents
were evaluated based on the Lowry method (29).
Serum sampling and hormonal analyses
Blood sample of each animal was collected directly
from heart and serum was separated by centrifugation
(3000 rpm for 5 minutes). Finally, serum progesterone,
estrogen, testosterone, androstenedione, FSH and LH
concentrations were measured. Serum levels of the
hormones were evaluated by ELISA method. Moreover,
intra- and inter-assay coefficient variances of the current
experiment were respectively estimated as 3.1, 3.9, 4.2,
3.2 and 4.6% for testosterone, estrogen, androstenedione,
LH and FSH (for 10 times), as well as 7.9, 6.3, 6.7, 7.2
and 6.3% for testosterone, estrogen, androstenedione, LH
and FSH (for 10 times).
Statistical analysis and imaging
The data were analyzed using SPSS for windows,
version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), presented as
mean ± SD and the comparison between groups were made
by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni
post-hoc test. Finally, the value of P<0.05 was considered
significant. SONY onboard camera (Zeiss, Cyber-Shot,
Japan) was used to take photomicrographs. The pixel-
based frequency for mRNA damage was analyzed using
Image pro-insight software (Version 9:00, USA).Nucleotide sequences and products size of the primers used in RT-PCRRT-PCR; Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and AT; Annealing temperature.
Results
Platelet-rich plasma diminished PCOS-induced
follicular atresia and mRNA damage
Animals of the PCOS-sole groups exhibited pie size
atretic/cystic follicles in the cortex of ovaries. However,
the animals of PRP auto-located groups showed corpus
luteom formation, representing physiologic ovulation.
Histological observations showed that PRP decreased
PCOS-induced follicular atresia. Accordingly, the
animals of PRP auto-located groups exhibited remarkably
(P<0.05) higher number of intact preantral and antral
follicles/ovary versus non-treated PCOS-induced
animals. Moreover, special fluorescent staining was done
to assess PCOS-induced mRNA damage. The animals
in PCOS-sole groups showed intensive mRNA damage.
Meanwhile, those of PRP auto-located groups exhibited
diminished mRNA damage in pixel based frequency
analyses. No histopathological change was seen in the
control group (Fig .2A-D).
Fig.2
Cross sections from ovarian tissue and mRNA damage. A. Hematoxylin and eosin
staining of ovarian cross sections in different groups; see massivecystic (CF) and
atretic follicles distribution on the ovaries of the PCOS-sole groups. The ovaries
from PRP-treated groups represent corpora lutea (CL) on theovaries following 15 and 30
days, B. Fluorescent staining for RNA damage: the cross sections of
PCOS-sole groups represent damaged RNA in yellowish and/orgreen fluorescent spots
(arrows). Meanwhile, the sections of PRP-treated groups exhibit intact RNA in bright
red fluorescent reactions (arrows), C. Pixel based frequency assay for
bright red fluorescent reactivity (marking intact RNA content) in 209×10 µm of tissue;
see diminished reactivity in the PCOS-sole groups, and D. Mean ± SD of intact
preantral and antral follicles in different groups. Different letters represent
significant differences (P<0.05) between groups (n=6). PCOS; Polycystic ovarian
syndrome, PRP; Platelet-rich plasm, Pre-antral: a vs. b, d, e; P=0.001, a vs. c;
P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.001, b vs. d; P=0.02, b vs. e; P=0.02, c vs. d; P=0.001, c vs. e;
P=0.02, Antral: a vs. b, d; P=0.001, a vs. c; P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.001, b vs. d;
P=0.01 (scale bar: 300 µm).
Cross sections from ovarian tissue and mRNA damage. A. Hematoxylin and eosin
staining of ovarian cross sections in different groups; see massivecystic (CF) and
atretic follicles distribution on the ovaries of the PCOS-sole groups. The ovaries
from PRP-treated groups represent corpora lutea (CL) on theovaries following 15 and 30
days, B. Fluorescent staining for RNA damage: the cross sections of
PCOS-sole groups represent damaged RNA in yellowish and/orgreen fluorescent spots
(arrows). Meanwhile, the sections of PRP-treated groups exhibit intact RNA in bright
red fluorescent reactions (arrows), C. Pixel based frequency assay for
bright red fluorescent reactivity (marking intact RNA content) in 209×10 µm of tissue;
see diminished reactivity in the PCOS-sole groups, and D. Mean ± SD of intact
preantral and antral follicles in different groups. Different letters represent
significant differences (P<0.05) between groups (n=6). PCOS; Polycystic ovarian
syndrome, PRP; Platelet-rich plasm, Pre-antral: a vs. b, d, e; P=0.001, a vs. c;
P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.001, b vs. d; P=0.02, b vs. e; P=0.02, c vs. d; P=0.001, c vs. e;
P=0.02, Antral: a vs. b, d; P=0.001, a vs. c; P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.001, b vs. d;
P=0.01 (scale bar: 300 µm).
Platelet-rich plasma enhanced Erα and Erß expression
The animals of PCOS-sole groups exhibited
diminished mRNA levels of Erα and Erβ compared to
the control group. However, semi-quantitative RT-PCR
analyses exhibited significant (P<0.05) enhancement
in mRNA levels of Erα and Erβ in the PRP auto-located
groups compared to the PCOS-sole groups. More IHC
analyses showed similar results, representing the
elevated number of Erα and Erβ-positive cells per 1
mm2 of tissue in the PRP auto-located groups versus
the PCOS-sole animals (Fig .3A-E).
Fig.3
IHC staining and RT-PCR results for Erα and Erβ.
A. See decreased Erα-positive reactions in the PCOS-sole group, while
it is increased in the PRP-treated groups. Note the increased Erß-positive cells in
the PRP-treated group (30 days after PCOS-induction), B. Mean ± SD of Erα
(a vs. b; P=0.01, a vs. c; P=0.03, b vs. c; P=0.03), C. Erß-positive
cells per 1 mm2 of tissue in different groups (n=6) (a vs. b, c; P=0.001),
D. Electrophoresis photomicrographs of Erα and
Erβ mRNA in different groups, and E. Density of
Erα and Erβ mRNA levels in ovarian tissue,
measured by densitometry and normalized to ß-Actin mRNA expression level (a vs. b;
P=0.02, a vs. c; P=0.03). Arrows are representing positive reaction for
Erα and Erβ antibodies. All data are represented
in mean ± SD (n=6). Different letters represent significant differences
(P<0.05) between groups (scale bar: 300 µm). IHC; Immunohistochemical, RT-PCR;
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, ER; Estrogen receptor, PCOS;
Polycystic ovarian syndrome, CF; Cystic follicle, CL; Corpus luteum, and PRP;
Platelet-rich plasma.
The PCOS-sole animals exhibited increased expression of
c-Myc compared to control group. Meanwhile, the animals of
PRP auto-located groups showed diminished expression of
c-Myc versus PCOS-sole groups. Accordingly, lower mRNA
level and c-Myc-positive cells distribution were observed in
PRP auto-located animals (Fig .4A-D).
Fig.4
IHC staining and RT-PCR results for c-Myc. A. See increased c-Myc-positive cells in
the PCOS-sole groups vs. the control group. PRP-treated sections represent reduced
c-Myc-positive cells compared to the PCOS-sole groups, B. Mean ± SD of
c-Myc-positive cells per 1 mm2 of tissue in different groups (n=6) (a vs. b; P=0.01, a
vs. c; P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.02), C. Electrophoresis photomicrographs of
c-MycmRNA in different groups, and D. Density of c-MycmRNA levels in
ovarian tissue, measured by densitometry and normalized to ß-ActinmRNA expression
level (a vs. b, c; P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.01). Arrows are representing positive reaction
for c-Myc antibody. All data are represented in mean ± SD (n=6). Different letters
represent significant differences (P<0.05) between groups (scale bar: 300 µm).
IHC; Immunohistochemical, RT-PCR; Reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction,
PCOS; Polycystic ovarian syndrome, and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
IHC staining and RT-PCR results for Erα and Erβ.
A. See decreased Erα-positive reactions in the PCOS-sole group, while
it is increased in the PRP-treated groups. Note the increased Erß-positive cells in
the PRP-treated group (30 days after PCOS-induction), B. Mean ± SD of Erα
(a vs. b; P=0.01, a vs. c; P=0.03, b vs. c; P=0.03), C. Erß-positive
cells per 1 mm2 of tissue in different groups (n=6) (a vs. b, c; P=0.001),
D. Electrophoresis photomicrographs of Erα and
Erβ mRNA in different groups, and E. Density of
Erα and Erβ mRNA levels in ovarian tissue,
measured by densitometry and normalized to ß-Actin mRNA expression level (a vs. b;
P=0.02, a vs. c; P=0.03). Arrows are representing positive reaction for
Erα and Erβ antibodies. All data are represented
in mean ± SD (n=6). Different letters represent significant differences
(P<0.05) between groups (scale bar: 300 µm). IHC; Immunohistochemical, RT-PCR;
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, ER; Estrogen receptor, PCOS;
Polycystic ovarian syndrome, CF; Cystic follicle, CL; Corpus luteum, and PRP;
Platelet-rich plasma.IHC staining and RT-PCR results for c-Myc. A. See increased c-Myc-positive cells in
the PCOS-sole groups vs. the control group. PRP-treated sections represent reduced
c-Myc-positive cells compared to the PCOS-sole groups, B. Mean ± SD of
c-Myc-positive cells per 1 mm2 of tissue in different groups (n=6) (a vs. b; P=0.01, a
vs. c; P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.02), C. Electrophoresis photomicrographs of
c-MycmRNA in different groups, and D. Density of c-MycmRNA levels in
ovarian tissue, measured by densitometry and normalized to ß-ActinmRNA expression
level (a vs. b, c; P=0.01, b vs. c; P=0.01). Arrows are representing positive reaction
for c-Myc antibody. All data are represented in mean ± SD (n=6). Different letters
represent significant differences (P<0.05) between groups (scale bar: 300 µm).
IHC; Immunohistochemical, RT-PCR; Reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction,
PCOS; Polycystic ovarian syndrome, and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
Platelet-rich plasma enhanced ovarian antioxidant
status
To estimate the ovarian antioxidant potential, TAC,
MDA, SOD and CSG-px levels were analyzed.
Observations showed significant (P<0.05) reduction in
TAC, SOD and GSH-px levels of ovaries in the PCOS-
sole group versus the control animals, while, ovarian
MDA content was increased in the PCOS-sole groups
compared to the control group. In contrast, those animals
in the PRP auto-located groups exhibited remarkable
(P<0.05) reduction in MDA content and significant
(P<0.05) enhancement in TAC, SOD and GSH-px levels
versus the PCOS-sole group. The data for antioxidant
profile are presented in Table 2.
The PCOS-sole animal groups showed increased serum
levels of FSH, LH, testosterone and androstenedione as
well as diminished levels of estrogen and progesterone
compared to control group. However, the animals of PRP
auto-located groups exhibited diminished serum levels of
FSH, LH, testosterone and androstenedione. Moreover,
serum estrogen and progesterone levels were increased in
the PRP auto-located groups in comparison to the PCOS-
sole animals (P<0.05). The data for hormonal profile are
presented in Table 3.Serum hormone levels in different groupsData are presented as mean ± SD. Different letters represent significant differences (P<0.05) between data in the same row (n=6). 15 D; 15 days after
PCOS-induction, 30 D; 30 days following PCOS-induction, FSH; Follicle stimulating hormone, LH; Luteinizing hormone, PCOS; Polycystic ovarian syndrome,
and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.Antioxidant profiles of ovarian tissue in different groupsData are presented as mean ± SD. Different letters represent significant differences (P<0.05) between data in the same row (n=6). 15 D; 15 days after
PCOS-induction, 30 D; 30 days following PCOS-induction, TAC; Total antioxidant capacity, MDA; Malondialdehyde, SOD; Superoxide dismutase, GSH-px;
Glutathione peroxidase, PCOS; Polycystic ovarian syndrome, and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
Discussion
Considering cross-links between oxidative stress,
hyperandrogenemia, insulin resistance and PCOS, the
present study was performed to uncover the ameliorative
role of PRP against PCOS-induced/related pathogenesis
in animal models. Our findings showed that, auto-locating
PRP significantly improved ovarian antioxidant status,
down-regulated androgen synthesis and up-regulated
follicular survival as well as ovulation. Moreover serum
estrogen level and expression of Erα and Erβ, as important
elements in follicular growth/atresia, were evaluated
after PRP auto-location. Observations revealed that PRP
significantly enhanced serum estrogen and progesterone
levels and up-regulated ERs expression. Finally,
considering the prooven pro-apoptotic role of c-Myc in
theca interna of atretic follicles, as well as peripheral theca
lutein cells, c-Myc mRNA level and c-Myc-positive cells
distribution/1 mm2 of ovarian tissue were evaluated. The
PRP auto-located groups showed a remarkable reduction
in c-Myc expression versus PCOS-sole animals.It has been well-established that in majority of cases
(especially in the models with hyperandrogenemia),
PCOS associates with insulin resistance and severe
oxidative stress (30, 31). To understand the subject, it
should be noted that hyperglycemia and higher levels
of free fatty acid following insulin resistance initiate the
oxidative stress by producing higher amounts of free
radicals (32). On the other hand, positive correlation
between oxidative stress and elevated androgen levels
has been discovered in PCOS (33). Minding the androgen
boosting effect of free radicals (34) as well as ameliorative
effect of PRP on hyperandrogenemia and oxidative stress,
serum androgen levels and ovarian antioxidant status
were analyzed. Our findings showed that auto-locating
PRP significantly diminished serum testosterone and
androstenedione levels, improved ovarian TAC level and
diminished lipid peroxidation ratio. On the other hand,
any reduction in tissue levels of antioxidant enzymes,
including SOD, GSH-px and catalase has been reported
to initiate and promote oxidative stress in ovarian tissue
(35). To show alterations, we assessed tissue levels of
SOD and GSH-px. Observations revealed that PRP
significantly enhanced PCOS-reduced GSH-px and SOD
levels. Based on biochemical results, PRP could fairly
up-regulate the ovarian GSH-px and SOD levels. Indeed,
pathologically-produced oxidative stress results in severe
damages at cellular levels of DNA, RNA, protein and lipid
(36). Thus, we assessed RNA damage and MDA levels
as biomarkers for oxidative stress-induced damages.
Based on biochemical findings, PRP auto-location
significantly diminished mRNA damage and reduced
ovarian MDA content. Taking all these findings together,
we can suggest that PRP induces antiandrogenic and
antioxidant effects, at least in the case of experimentally-
induced hyperandrogenic PCOS. In line with this issue
and considering the boosting effect of antioxidants on
meaningful follicular growth, the complementary and
antioxidant chemicals are lastly used to manage/reduce
the PCOS-induced pathogenesis. Consistently, various
studies showed that administrating antioxidant agents
are able to potentially improve insulin sensitivity and
enhance the ovarian antioxidant potential in women with
PCOS (37, 38).PCOS up-regulates serum gonadotropin levels and
significantly diminishes the estrogen and progesterone
synthesis versus control animals and/or fertile women (4).
In corroboration with those reports, the animals in PCOS-
sole groups showed higher serum LH and FSH levels, in
addition to lower levels of estrogen and progesterone versus
the control group. In contrast, PRP auto-location reversed
the condition by reducing serum LH and FSH levels, and
up-regulating estrogen and progesterone concentrations.
In line with this, it has been illustrated that estrogen inflicts
the GC proliferation, oocyte development, maintains the
follicular survival (from atresia), promotes the ovarian
angiogenesis (8, 9) and finally by binding to its nuclear
receptor (Erα and Erβ) stimulates various growth factors
secretion, such as IGF and EGF, resulting in follicular
survival (14). However, any reduction in Erα
expression
results in a failed follicular maturation and/or ovulation
and hemorrhagic cysts formation. In addition, the failed
Erß
expression leads to chronic anovulation (8). Thus, we
can suggest that diminished estrogen secretion in PCOS-
sole groups impressively inflicted follicular atresia, which
ultimately resulted in an impaired ovulation. Considering
significant up-regulation of follicular growth as well
as diminished atresia in PRP auto-located groups, we
can suggest that PRP improves follicular growth by up-
regulating the estrogen secretion and enhancing the Erα
and Erß
expressions. Aside these hypotheses, it should
be considered that PRP, by preserving the gonadotropins
secretion, might restore the ovarian-hypophysis hormonal
disruption and, by up-regulating the estrogen synthesis,
promoted follicular cells proliferation and oocyte
development. All of these evidences thereafter promote
follicular growth and accelerate successful ovulation
(marked with increased corpora lutea generation and
progesterone level in PRP auto-located groups). The role
of growth hormones in early (FSH-independent follicular
development) and late (cell proliferation and inhibiting
apoptosis) folliculogenesis should not be ignored (39). As
PRP potentially contains several growth factors, it would
be more logic to suggest that the ameliorative effect of
PRP may partially depend on several growth hormones,
which could be assessable in ovaries following PRP auto-
location.Massive expression of c-Myc protein in GCs, theca
interna of atretic follicles and peripheral theca lutein cells
confirm the c-Myc-induced pro-apoptotic characteristic
(11). Our RT-PCR and IHC analyses showed increased
c-Myc expression in PCOS-sole groups versus control
animals. However, the animal of PRP auto-located groups
exhibited a diminished expression of c-Myc. In order to
understand the subject, contrary roles of c-Myc should
be highlighted. Indeed, c-Myc, under certain conditions,
exerts completely opposite features. Accordingly,
the estrogen (at physiologic levels) by targeting the
ERs (especially Erα), stimulates the follicular growth
through induction of G1- to S-phase transition. Actually,
current induction is mainly associated with rapid and
direct up-regulation of c-Myc, controlling cyclin D1
expression, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activation
and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma proteins (40).
In contrast, c-Myc overexpression and/or inappropriate
expression is sufficient to induce/promote apoptosis
in GCs, theca interna of atretic follicles and peripheral
theca lutein cells (10, 11). All of these evidences inflict
atresia. Taking all together, we can conclude that
diminished estrogen synthesis, associated with decreased
expression of ERs in PCOS-sole groups, may trigger
c-Myc overexpression, leading to impressive apoptosis at
follicular level. However, ameliorated estrogen synthesis
and up-regulated ERs expression in PRP-auto-located
groups could fairly adjust the PCOS-increased c-Myc
level. Diminished follicular atresia in PRP auto-located
groups confirms this hypothesis.Although ameliorated follicular growth, enhanced
ovulation ratio (marked with higher corpora lutes), up-
regulated antioxidant status and balanced hormonal
levels are illustrated in the current study, there are some
limitations in this study -including sample size in terms
of quantity, focusing on aromatization, angiogenesis and
insulin resistance of animals- which should be considered
in the future studies.
Conclusion
Our preliminary data showed that auto-locating
PRP fairly ameliorates PCOS-induced pathogenesis.
Accordingly, it is able to suppress androgen over-
synthesis and ameliorate hormonal imbalance, in addition
to improvement of ovarian antioxidant status as well
as inhibiting c-Myc overexpression. It can ultimately
enhance ovulation ratio. Considering these findings and
minding high amounts of different growth factors in PRP,
auto-location of this factor could be considered as a new
method for PCOS subjects.
Table 1
Nucleotide sequences and products size of the primers used in RT-PCR
Target genes
Primer sequence (5´-3´)
AT (˚C)
Product size (bp)
Erα
F: CCGGTCTATGGCCAGTCGAGCATC
62
380
R: GTAGAAGGCGGGAGGGCCGGTGTC
Erβ
F: AGCGACCCATTGCCAATCA
58
290
R: CTGGCACAACTGCTCCCACTAA
c-Myc
F: AACTTACAATCTGCGAGCCA
50
420
R: AGCAGCTCGAATTTCTTCCAGATAT
Β-Actin
F: GTTACCAGGGCTGCCTTCTC
60
310
R: GGGTTTCCCGTTGATGACC
RT-PCR; Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and AT; Annealing temperature.
Table 2
Serum hormone levels in different groups
Groups
Estrogen (pg/ml)
Progesterone (pg/ml)
Testosterone (ng/ml)
Androstenedione (ng/ml)
FSH (ng/ml)
LH (ng/ml)
Control
72.25 ± 19.00a
66.90 ± 4.33a
0.68 ± 0.34a
0.44 ± 0.07a
1.24 ± 0.12a
0.75 ± 0.10a
PCOS-15 D
20.33 ± 7.50b
12.90 ± 2.10b
2.21 ± 0.62b
0.93 ± 0.08b
2.45 ± 0.51b
1.81 ± 0.51b
PRP-treated 15 D
48.64 ± 5.68c
60.45 ± 8.91a
0.72 ± 0.22a
0.48 ± 0.13a
1.28 ± 0.09a
1.02 ± 0.26a
PCOS-30 D
21.37 ± 6.99b
10.77 ± 1.45b
1.67 ± 0.56b
1.14 ± 0.19b
2.84 ± 0.43b
1.94 ± 0.34b
PRP-treated 30 D
56.37 ± 3.21c
64.33 ± 6.41a
0.64 ± 0.16a
0.54 ± 0.10a
1.23 ± 0.11a
0.88 ± 0.10a
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Different letters represent significant differences (P<0.05) between data in the same row (n=6). 15 D; 15 days after
PCOS-induction, 30 D; 30 days following PCOS-induction, FSH; Follicle stimulating hormone, LH; Luteinizing hormone, PCOS; Polycystic ovarian syndrome,
and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
Table 3
Antioxidant profiles of ovarian tissue in different groups
Groups
TAC (mMol/mg protein)
MDA (mMol/mg protein)
SOD (U/ml)
GSH-px (U/ml)
Control
1.77 ± 0.43a
0.85 ± 0.10a
126.66 ± 7.35a
120.00 ± 21.01a
PCOS-15 D
0.45 ± 0.01b
2.66 ± 0.34b
37.66 ± 16.25b
63.10 ± 14.21b
PRP-treated 15 D
0.94 ± 0.05c
2.18 ± 0.06c
93.33 ± 7.02c
115.74 ± 21.37a
PCOS-30 D
0.59 ± 0.02d
3.77 ± 0.29d
34.00 ± 9.64b
51.44 ± 4.25b
PRP-treated 30 D
1.26 ± 0.06e
1.12 ± 0.150a,c
96.34 ± 8.34c
116.73 ± 14.37a
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Different letters represent significant differences (P<0.05) between data in the same row (n=6). 15 D; 15 days after
PCOS-induction, 30 D; 30 days following PCOS-induction, TAC; Total antioxidant capacity, MDA; Malondialdehyde, SOD; Superoxide dismutase, GSH-px;
Glutathione peroxidase, PCOS; Polycystic ovarian syndrome, and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.