INTRODUCTION:Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prominent clinical problem, with limited effective therapies. Preliminary non-randomized clinical trial data support that Scrambler Therapy is helpful in this situation. METHODS:Patients were eligible if they had CIPN symptoms for at least 3 months and CIPN-related tingling or pain at least 4/10 in severity during the week prior to registration. They were randomized to receive Scrambler Therapy versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 2 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were utilized to measure efficacy and toxicity daily for 2 weeks during therapy and then weekly for 8 additional weeks. RESULTS: This study accrued 50 patients, 25 to each of the 2 study arms; 46 patients were evaluable. There were twice as many Scrambler-treated patients who had at least a 50% documented improvement during the 2 treatment weeks, from their baseline pain, tingling, and numbness scores, when compared with the TENS-treated patients (from 36 to 56% compared with 16-28% for each symptom). Global Impression of Change scores for "neuropathy symptoms," pain, and quality of life were similarly improved during the treatment weeks. Patients in the Scrambler group were more likely than those in the TENS group to recommend their treatment to other patients, during both the 2-week treatment period and the 8-week follow-up period (p < 0.0001). Minimal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this pilot trial were positive, supporting the conduct of further investigations regarding the use of Scrambler Therapy for treating CIPN.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prominent clinical problem, with limited effective therapies. Preliminary non-randomized clinical trial data support that Scrambler Therapy is helpful in this situation. METHODS:Patients were eligible if they had CIPN symptoms for at least 3 months and CIPN-related tingling or pain at least 4/10 in severity during the week prior to registration. They were randomized to receive Scrambler Therapy versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 2 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were utilized to measure efficacy and toxicity daily for 2 weeks during therapy and then weekly for 8 additional weeks. RESULTS: This study accrued 50 patients, 25 to each of the 2 study arms; 46 patients were evaluable. There were twice as many Scrambler-treated patients who had at least a 50% documented improvement during the 2 treatment weeks, from their baseline pain, tingling, and numbness scores, when compared with the TENS-treated patients (from 36 to 56% compared with 16-28% for each symptom). Global Impression of Change scores for "neuropathy symptoms," pain, and quality of life were similarly improved during the treatment weeks. Patients in the Scrambler group were more likely than those in the TENS group to recommend their treatment to other patients, during both the 2-week treatment period and the 8-week follow-up period (p < 0.0001). Minimal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this pilot trial were positive, supporting the conduct of further investigations regarding the use of Scrambler Therapy for treating CIPN.
Authors: Ellen M Lavoie Smith; Herbert Pang; Constance Cirrincione; Stewart Fleishman; Electra D Paskett; Tim Ahles; Linda R Bressler; Camilo E Fadul; Chetaye Knox; Nguyet Le-Lindqwister; Paul B Gilman; Charles L Shapiro Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Debra L Barton; Edward J Wos; Rui Qin; Bassam I Mattar; Nathan Benjamin Green; Keith S Lanier; James Dewitt Bearden; John W Kugler; Kay L Hoff; Pavan S Reddy; Kendrith M Rowland; Mike Riepl; Bradley Christensen; Charles L Loprinzi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: T J Postma; N K Aaronson; J J Heimans; M J Muller; J G Hildebrand; J Y Delattre; K Hoang-Xuan; M Lantéri-Minet; R Grant; R Huddart; C Moynihan; J Maher; R Lucey Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Marianna Ricci; Sara Pirotti; Emanuela Scarpi; Marco Burgio; Marco Maltoni; Elisabetta Sansoni; Dino Amadori Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Julie E Hammack; John C Michalak; Charles L Loprinzi; Jeff A Sloan; Paul J Novotny; Gamini S Soori; Maria Tria Tirona; Kendrith M Rowland; Philip J Stella; Joanne A Johnson Journal: Pain Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Ravi D Rao; John C Michalak; Jeff A Sloan; Charles L Loprinzi; Gamini S Soori; Daniel A Nikcevich; David O Warner; Paul Novotny; Leila A Kutteh; Gilbert Y Wong Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Christina Lacchetti; Robert H Dworkin; Ellen M Lavoie Smith; Jonathan Bleeker; Guido Cavaletti; Cynthia Chauhan; Patrick Gavin; Antoinette Lavino; Maryam B Lustberg; Judith Paice; Bryan Schneider; Mary Lou Smith; Tom Smith; Shelby Terstriep; Nina Wagner-Johnston; Kate Bak; Charles L Loprinzi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jessica N Mezzanotte; Michael Grimm; Namrata V Shinde; Timiya Nolan; Lise Worthen-Chaudhari; Nicole O Williams; Maryam B Lustberg Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2022-02-15