Literature DB >> 21394458

Managing chronic pain: results from an open-label study using MC5-A Calmare® device.

Marianna Ricci1, Sara Pirotti, Emanuela Scarpi, Marco Burgio, Marco Maltoni, Elisabetta Sansoni, Dino Amadori.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite state-of-the-art therapeutic strategies for pain, some types of chronic pain remain difficult to treat. We evaluated the effectiveness of an innovative neuromodulative approach to the treatment of chronic pain using electrical stimulus integrated with pharmacological support.
METHODS: The MC5-A Calmare© is a new device for patient-specific cutaneous electrostimulation which, by "scrambling" pain information with "no pain" information, aims to reduce the perception of pain intensity. We prospectively treated 73 patients with cancer- (40) and non-cancer-related (33) pain whose pain management was unsatisfactory. The primary objective of the study was to assess efficacy and tolerability of the device. Pain intensity was assessed daily with a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for the duration of treatment (2 weeks) and then on a weekly basis for the 2 weeks of follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean pain value at T0 (pre-treatment value) was 6.2 [± 2.5 SD (standard deviation)], 1.6 (± 2.0) (p < 0.0001) at T2 (after the 10th day of treatment), and 2.9 (± 2.6) (p < 0.0001) at T4 (after the second week of follow-up, i.e., 1 month after the beginning of treatment). Response after the second week of treatment showed a clear reduction in pain for both cancer (mean absolute delta of the reduction in NRS value = 4.0) and non-cancer (mean delta = 5.2) patients. The pain score had decreased by 74% at T2. On the basis of pre-established response criteria, there were 78% of responders at T2 and 81% at T4. No side effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that cutaneous electrostimulation with the MC5-A Calmare© can be hypothesized as part of a multimodality approach to the treatment of chronic pain. Further studies on larger numbers of patients are needed to assess its efficacy, to quantify the effects of inter-operator variability, and to compare results obtained from the active device versus those from a sham machine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21394458     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1128-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  23 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  D Bridges; S W Thompson; A S Rice
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Opioids, pain, and fear.

Authors:  M Maltoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques for neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Oscar A de Leon-Casasola
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 4.  Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care.

Authors:  Augusto Caraceni; Nathan Cherny; Robin Fainsinger; Stein Kaasa; Philippe Poulain; Lukas Radbruch; Franco De Conno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Spinal cord stimulation in sympathetically maintained complex regional pain syndrome type I with severe disability. A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Henning Harke; Peter Gretenkort; Hans Ulrich Ladleif; Salah Rahman
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Practice guidelines for chronic pain management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 7.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  A Mailis-Gagnon; A D Furlan; J A Sandoval; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 8.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain.

Authors:  Kelechi E Nnoaham; Jharna Kumbang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

9.  Cancer-related pain: a pan-European survey of prevalence, treatment, and patient attitudes.

Authors:  H Breivik; N Cherny; B Collett; F de Conno; M Filbet; A J Foubert; R Cohen; L Dow
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Severe undertreatment of cancer pain: a 3-year survey of the German situation.

Authors:  M Zenz; T Zenz; M Tryba; M Strumpf
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.612

View more
  19 in total

1.  Pilot evaluation of scrambler therapy for pain induced by bone and visceral metastases and refractory to standard therapies.

Authors:  Paolo Notaro; Carlo Alberto Dell'Agnola; Alessandro J Dell'Agnola; Alessio Amatu; Katia Bruna Bencardino; Salvatore Siena
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Reproducibility of results on chronic pain with MC5-A Calmare® device from independent studies.

Authors:  Marianna Ricci; Sara Pirotti; Emanuela Scarpi; Marco Burgio; Marco Maltoni; Elisabetta Sansoni; Dino Amadori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Scrambler therapy for chemotherapy neuropathy: a randomized phase II pilot trial.

Authors:  Charles Loprinzi; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Neil Majithia; Ryan P McMurray; Carrie R O'Neill; Markus A Bendel; Andreas Beutler; Daniel H Lachance; Andrea Cheville; David M Strick; David F Black; Jon C Tilburt; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Adiposis Dolorosa Pain Management.

Authors:  Anne H Eliason; Young Il Seo; Douglas Murphy; Christopher Beal
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2019-11

5.  Clinical experiences on the effect of scrambler therapy for patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Young Kwon Ko; Ho Young Lee; Wang Yong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-01-04

6.  Scrambler therapy improves pain in neuromyelitis optica: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maureen A Mealy; Sharon L Kozachik; Lawrence J Cook; Lauren Totonis; Ruth Andrea Salazar; Jerilyn K Allen; Marie T Nolan; Thomas J Smith; Michael Levy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Pilot evaluation of Scrambler therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Deirdre R Pachman; Breanna L Weisbrod; Drew K Seisler; Debra L Barton; Kelliann C Fee-Schroeder; Thomas J Smith; Daniel H Lachance; Heshan Liu; Randy A Shelerud; Andrea L Cheville; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A trial of Scrambler therapy in the treatment of cancer pain syndromes and chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Patrick J Coyne; Wen Wan; Patricia Dodson; Craig Swainey; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother       Date:  2013-10-21

Review 9.  Scrambler Therapy for the management of chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil Majithia; Thomas J Smith; Patrick J Coyne; Salahadin Abdi; Deirdre R Pachman; Daniel Lachance; Randy Shelerud; Andrea Cheville; Jeffrey R Basford; David Farley; Carrie O'Neill; Kathryn J Ruddy; Frank Sparadeo; Andreas Beutler; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Differential response to scrambler therapy by neuropathic pain phenotypes.

Authors:  Young Gi Min; Hyun Seok Baek; Kyoung-Min Lee; Yoon-Ho Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.