Literature DB >> 26256934

Minimally invasive surgery fellowship graduates: Their demographics, practice patterns, and contributions.

Adrian E Park1, Erica R H Sutton2, B Todd Heniford3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fellowship opportunities in minimally invasive surgery, bariatric, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary arose to address unmet training needs. The large cohort of non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education -accredited fellowship graduates (NACGMEG) has been difficult to track. In this, the largest survey of graduates to date, our goal was to characterize this unique group's demographics and professional activities. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 580 NACGMEG were surveyed covering 150 data points: demographics, practice patterns, academics, lifestyle, leadership, and maintenance of certification.
RESULTS: Of 580 previous fellows, 234 responded. Demographics included: average age 37 years, 84% male, 75% in urban settings, 49% in purely academic practice, and 58% in practice <5 years. They averaged 337 operating room cases/year (approximately 400/year for private practice vs 300/year for academic). NACGMEG averaged 100 flexible endoscopies/year (61 esophagogastroduodenoscopies, 39 colon). In the past 24 months, 60% had submitted abstracts to a national meeting, and 54% submitted manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals. Subset analyses revealed relevant relationships. There was high satisfaction (98%) that their fellowship experience met expectations; 78% termed their fellowships, versus 50% for residencies, highly pertinent to their current practices. 63% of previous fellows occupy local leadership roles, and most engage in maintenance of certification activities.
CONCLUSION: Fellowship alumnae appear to be productive contributors to American surgery. They are clinically and academically active, believe endoscopy is important, have adopted continuous learning, and most assume work leadership roles. The majority acknowledge their fellowship training as having met expectations and uniquely equipping them for their current practice.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26256934     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  Providing complex GI surgical care with minimally invasive approaches: a survey of the practice patterns of Fellowship Council alumni.

Authors:  Joshua J Weis; Adnan A Alseidi; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Michael A Schweitzer; Yumi Hori; Vanessa Cheung; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Advanced GI Surgery Training-a Roadmap for the Future: the White Paper from the SSAT Task Force on Advanced GI Surgery Training.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Kevin E Behrns; Nathaniel J Soper; Fabrizio Michelassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Perception versus reality: elucidating motivation and expectations of current fellowship council minimally invasive surgery fellows.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Watkins; Aurora D Pryor; Michael S Truitt; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES Advanced GI/MIS fellowship redesign: pilot results and adoption of new standards.

Authors:  Joshua J Weis; Matthew Goldblatt; Aurora Pryor; Linda Schultz; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  SAGES white paper on the current state of community practice surgeons: re-discovering the value of our community practice surgeons.

Authors:  Caitlin Halbert; Robert Catania; David Earle; Igor Elyash; Nicole Fearing; Seung Gwon; Rohan Joseph; Fernando Mier; Andrew Morfesi; Roy Shen; Daniel Slack; Shirin Towfigh; Jarvis Walters; Kevin Wasco; Debbie Youngelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.453

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.