Literature DB >> 31209443

Patients' and Parents' Valuation of Fluoride.

Emma G Walshaw, Naeem I Adam, Marina L Palmeiro, Matheus Neves, Christopher R Vernazza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) values for fluoride varnish application from participants using the publically-funded health services in Brazil and the UK, and to identify differences in the variables impacting these values. A secondary aim was to compare WTP values from parents for their own preventive treatment and their child's.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of quantitative data collected from participants attending routine dental appointments. The clinics were hosted by the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Brazil and Newcastle Dental Hospital, UK.
RESULTS: The mean WTP for Brazilian adults was R$60.37 (=£15.97). WTP was highly variable and factors affecting it were difficult to identify. UK parents valued fluoride varnish at mean values of £28.21 and £28.12 for themselves and their child, respectively. Regression modelling found those with higher incomes had higher WTP in both samples. In the UK, parental and child WTP increased when parents had higher self-perceived need for dental treatment, had experienced recent dental pain, or their child had received restorations in the last 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: WTP for fluoride varnish varied dramatically between individuals. In both countries, it was difficult to predict this variance, as factors which would likely impact upon on WTP had a limited effect and were sometimes counter-intuitive. WTP values for a parent and their child were not statistically significantly different.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dentistry; economics; fluorides; preference-based measures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209443      PMCID: PMC6588524          DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a42666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Health Prev Dent        ISSN: 1602-1622            Impact factor:   1.256


  15 in total

1.  Willingness to pay as patient preference to bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Cristina Khawali; Marcos B Ferraz; Maria T Zanella; Sandra R G Ferreira
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Willingness to pay for dentin regeneration in a sample of dentate adults.

Authors:  Stephen Birch; Woosung Sohn; Amid I Ismail; James M Lepkowski; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.383

3.  Willingness to pay for implant therapy: a study of patient preference.

Authors:  Katherine C M Leung; Colman P J McGrath
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  The value of caries preventive care among 19-year olds using the contingent valuation method within a cost-benefit approach.

Authors:  N Oscarson; L Lindholm; C Källestål
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.383

5.  World Health Organization global policy for improvement of oral health--World Health Assembly 2007.

Authors:  Poul Erik Petersen
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  How to measure the cost-effectiveness of periodontal treatments.

Authors:  Chris Vernazza; Peter Heasman; Francesca Gaunt; Mark Pennington
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 7.  Preference based measurements in dentistry: a review of the literature and recommendations for research.

Authors:  D C Matthews; A Gafni; S Birch
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.349

Review 8.  Patient preferences and the measurement of utilities in the evaluation of dental technologies.

Authors:  S Birch; A I Ismail
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 9.  Cochrane reviews of randomized trials of fluoride therapies for preventing dental caries.

Authors:  V C C Marinho
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-09

10.  Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; David A Scott; Cam Donaldson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.883

View more
  2 in total

1.  An overview of the methodological aspects and policy implications of willingness-to-pay studies in oral health: a scoping review of existing literature.

Authors:  Navid Saadatfar; Mohammad Pooyan Jadidfard
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Prevalence of Missing Values and Protest Zeros in Contingent Valuation in Dental Medicine.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi; Arta Ramadani; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.