Cristina Khawali1, Marcos B Ferraz, Maria T Zanella, Sandra R G Ferreira. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Internal Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São PauloInternal Medicine Department, São Paulo Center for Health Economics, Federal University of São Paulo, São PauloDivision of Endocrinology, Internal Medicine Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São PauloNutrition Department, School of Public Health University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An obesity epidemic is spreading worldwide. In addition to comorbidities, social and emotional problems contribute to reduce the quality of life (QoL) of obese people. Considering the heterogeneity of outcomes from clinical and surgical approaches, it is recommended that severely obese patients participate in their treatment decisions. This study evaluated preferences of severely obese patients for obesity surgical treatment using the willingness to pay (WTP) and to assess the impact of the presence of some clinical disorders, socioeconomic conditions and QoL on their decisions. METHODS: The selected patients were invited to answer the WTP questionnaire using two formats of contingent valuation questions: dichotomous choice (yes/no) and a bidding game. The answers were correlated with clinical features, QoL assessed by the SF-36 and the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II, Brazilian socioeconomic classification, and family and personal incomes. RESULTS: The group of patients who accepted the first bid was older and had higher frequency of sleep apnoea when compared to those who rejected the offer. A significant correlation between the bidding game value and family income was found (r = 0.28; P < 0.02). In the logistic regression model, socioeconomic classification and sleep apnoea were shown to be independently associated with acceptance the bid. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep apnoea was the comorbidity that most influenced the acceptance in dichotomous choice for bariatric surgery, probably due to the deleterious effects on daily activities induced by sleep disturbances. Our findings also suggest that the frequency of surgical procedures is below the preference of the obese population in Brazil.
BACKGROUND: An obesity epidemic is spreading worldwide. In addition to comorbidities, social and emotional problems contribute to reduce the quality of life (QoL) of obesepeople. Considering the heterogeneity of outcomes from clinical and surgical approaches, it is recommended that severely obesepatients participate in their treatment decisions. This study evaluated preferences of severely obesepatients for obesity surgical treatment using the willingness to pay (WTP) and to assess the impact of the presence of some clinical disorders, socioeconomic conditions and QoL on their decisions. METHODS: The selected patients were invited to answer the WTP questionnaire using two formats of contingent valuation questions: dichotomous choice (yes/no) and a bidding game. The answers were correlated with clinical features, QoL assessed by the SF-36 and the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II, Brazilian socioeconomic classification, and family and personal incomes. RESULTS: The group of patients who accepted the first bid was older and had higher frequency of sleep apnoea when compared to those who rejected the offer. A significant correlation between the bidding game value and family income was found (r = 0.28; P < 0.02). In the logistic regression model, socioeconomic classification and sleep apnoea were shown to be independently associated with acceptance the bid. CONCLUSIONS:Sleep apnoea was the comorbidity that most influenced the acceptance in dichotomous choice for bariatric surgery, probably due to the deleterious effects on daily activities induced by sleep disturbances. Our findings also suggest that the frequency of surgical procedures is below the preference of the obese population in Brazil.
Authors: Melinda A Maggard; Lisa R Shugarman; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Harvey J Sugerman; Harvey J Sugarman; Edward H Livingston; Ninh T Nguyen; Zhaoping Li; Walter A Mojica; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: O Resta; M P Foschino-Barbaro; G Legari; S Talamo; P Bonfitto; A Palumbo; A Minenna; R Giorgino; G De Pergola Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2001-05
Authors: Matthew Delfino; Elizabeth W Holt; Charles R Taylor; Eve Wittenberg; Abrar A Qureshi Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Emma G Walshaw; Naeem I Adam; Marina L Palmeiro; Matheus Neves; Christopher R Vernazza Journal: Oral Health Prev Dent Date: 2019 Impact factor: 1.256