Literature DB >> 31209411

[Hemodynamic changes in standing-up test of children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome].

C Y Tao1, H X Li1, X Y Li2, C S Tang3, H F Jin1, J B DU1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the hemodynamic changes in standing-up test of children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and to compare hemodynamic parameters of POTS patients with decreased cardiac index (CI) and those with not-decreased CI.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to show the trends of CI, total peripheral vascular resistance index (TPVRI), heart rate and blood pressure in standing-up test of 26 POTS patients and 12 healthy controls, and to compare them between the two groups. The POTS patients were divided into two groups based on CI decreasing or not in standing-up test, namely decreased CI group (14 cases) and not-decreased CI group (12 cases). The trends of the above mentioned hemodynamic parameters in standing-up test were observed and compared between decreased CI group and not-decreased CI group.
RESULTS: In standing-up test for all the POTS patients, CI (F=6.936, P=0.001) and systolic blood pressure (F=6.049, P<0.001) both decreased significantly, and heart rate increased obviously (F=113.926, P<0.001). However, TPVRI (F=2.031, P=0.138) and diastolic blood pressure (F=2.018, P=0.113) had no significant changes. For healthy controls, CI (F=3.646, P=0.016), heart rate (F=43.970, P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (F=4.043, P=0.020) and diastolic blood pressure (F=8.627, P<0.001) all increased significantly in standing-up test. TPVRI (F=1.688, P=0.190) did not change obviously. The changing trends of CI (F=6.221, P=0.001), heart rate (F=6.203, P<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (F=7.946, P<0.001) over time were significantly different between the patients and healthy controls, however, no difference was found in TPVRI and diastolic blood pressure (P > 0.05). Among the POTS patients, CI was significantly different between decreased CI group and not-decreased CI group (F=14.723, P<0.001). Systolic blood pressure of the former decreased obviously (F=8.010, P<0.001), but it did not change obviously in the latter (F=0.612, P=0.639). Furthermore, none of the changes of TPVRI, heart rate and diastolic blood pressure in standing-up test were significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Age was an independent factor for decreased CI patients (P=0.013, OR=2.233; 95% CI, 1.183 to 4.216).
CONCLUSION: POTS patients experience vital hemodynamic changes in standing-up test, part of them suffering from decreased CI, but others from not-decreased CI. Age is an independent factor for patients suffering from decreased CI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209411      PMCID: PMC7439024          DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  20 in total

1.  Twenty-four-hour urinary sodium excretion and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  Qingyou Zhang; Ying Liao; Chaoshu Tang; Junbao Du; Hongfang Jin
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  Control of peripheral vascular resistance: evidence based on the in vitro study of resistance arteries.

Authors:  J A Bevan
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 0.825

3.  Cardiac origins of the postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Tiffany B Vangundy; M Melyn Galbreath; Shigeki Shibata; Manish Jain; Jeffrey L Hastings; Paul S Bhella; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Total peripheral vascular resistance, cardiac output, and plasma C-type natriuretic Peptide level in children with postural tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  Hongxia Li; Zhenhui Han; Siyao Chen; Ying Liao; Yuli Wang; Ping Liu; Yonghong Chen; Chaoshu Tang; Jing Lin; Junbao Du; Hongfang Jin
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: a clinical review.

Authors:  Jonathan N Johnson; Kenneth J Mack; Nancy L Kuntz; Chad K Brands; Coburn J Porter; Philip R Fischer
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 6.  The postural tachycardia syndrome.

Authors:  Marvin S Medow; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Abnormal baroreflex responses in patients with idiopathic orthostatic intolerance.

Authors:  W B Farquhar; J A Taylor; S E Darling; K P Chase; R Freeman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Beyond Orthostatic Intolerance.

Authors:  Emily M Garland; Jorge E Celedonio; Satish R Raj
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 9.  Sex, ageing and resting blood pressure: gaining insights from the integrated balance of neural and haemodynamic factors.

Authors:  Emma C Hart; Michael J Joyner; B Gunnar Wallin; Nisha Charkoudian
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Postural Hyperventilation as a Cause of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Increased Systemic Vascular Resistance and Decreased Cardiac Output When Upright in All Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Variants.

Authors:  Julian M Stewart; Paul Pianosi; Mohamed A Shaban; Courtney Terilli; Maria Svistunova; Paul Visintainer; Marvin S Medow
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.