| Literature DB >> 31208073 |
Libo Yu-Taeger1,2, Janice Stricker-Shaver3,4, Katrin Arnold5,6, Patrycja Bambynek-Dziuk7,8, Arianna Novati9,10, Elisabeth Singer11,12, Ali Lourhmati13, Claire Fabian14,15, Janine Magg16,17, Olaf Riess18,19, Matthias Schwab20,21,22,23, Alexandra Stolzing24,25, Lusine Danielyan26,27,28, Hoa Huu Phuc Nguyen29,30,31,32,33.
Abstract
Intrastriatal administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has shown beneficial effects in rodent models of Huntington disease (HD). However, the invasive nature of surgical procedure and its potential to trigger the host immune response may limit its clinical use. Hence, we sought to evaluate the non-invasive intranasal administration (INA) of MSC delivery as an effective alternative route in HD. GFP-expressing MSCs derived from bone marrow were intranasally administered to 4-week-old R6/2 HD transgenic mice. MSCs were detected in the olfactory bulb, midbrain and striatum five days post-delivery. Compared to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-treated littermates, MSC-treated R6/2 mice showed an increased survival rate and attenuated circadian activity disruption assessed by locomotor activity. MSCs increased the protein expression of DARPP-32 and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and downregulated gene expression of inflammatory modulators in the brain 7.5 weeks after INA. While vehicle treated R6/2 mice displayed decreased Iba1 expression and altered microglial morphology in comparison to the wild type littermates, MSCs restored both, Iba1 level and the thickness of microglial processes in the striatum of R6/2 mice. Our results demonstrate significantly ameliorated phenotypes of R6/2 mice after MSCs administration via INA, suggesting this method as an effective delivering route of cells to the brain for HD therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Huntington disease; R6/2 mice; cell therapy; dopamine transmission; intranasal; mesenchymal stem cells; microglia; neuroinflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31208073 PMCID: PMC6628278 DOI: 10.3390/cells8060595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro and MSCs tracking post-delivery. (A) MSC phenotype was analyzed before transplantation by means of flow cytometry (n = 3, mean ± SD). Blue bars represent negative markers (CD11b and CD45) whereas red bars are the positive markers. (B) Exemplary phase contrast image of eGFP-MSC at passage 2. (C) Quantification of GFP-positive cells and representative images showing GFP staining (pseudo-colored in red) in the olfactory bulb (OB), midbrain (MB) and striatum (STR) of R6/2 mice 5 days post-delivery of MSCs. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Figure 2Longitudinal assessment after intranasal MSCs administration. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve of MSC-treated R6/2 mice and control groups (n = 16 for each group). (B) Body weight recorded from 4 to 11 weeks of age (n = 16 for R6/2-MSC and wild type (WT)-phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), n = 12 for R6/2-PBS). (C) Rotarod test performance of MSC-treated mice after MSCs administration (n = 16 for R6/2-MSC and WT-PBS, n = 14 for R6/2-PBS). R6/2-MSC displayed a trend towards improved latency to fall as compared to R6/2-PBS starting from 4 weeks post MSC delivery (p = 0.1059) and continued to 6 weeks after cell application (p = 0.0848). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3Ameliorated sleeping disturbance in the MSC-treated R6/2 mice at the later disease stage. Locomotor activities of mice were monitored using LabMaster at 5 and 11 weeks of age for 22 h (n = 16 for R6/2-MSC and WT-PBS groups, n = 12 for R6/2-PBS group). The counts of beam breaks represent the ambulatory activities during the whole recording period (22 h) at (A) 5 and (B) 11 weeks of age, and (C) fine movement and (D) total activities in the light phase at both 5 and 11 weeks of age. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 4Altered gene expression of inflammation markers and neurotrophic factors in different brain regions. mRNA expression levels of (A) inflammatory regulators (MCP1, TNFα, IL-6, CCR5, and PTGER2) and (B) neurotrophic factors (BDNF, VEGF, and BDNF) were analyzed in 4 different brain parts (olfactory bulb, hippocampus, cortex and striatum) (WT-PBS, n = 6; R6/2-PBS, n = 6 and R6/2-MSC n = 8). Values were normalized to 36B4 level. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. IL-6 was not detectable in the striatum and hence was not presented here. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 5Enhanced expression of Iba1 and morphological changes of striatum-resident microglia in MSC-treated R6/2 mice. (A) Quantification of Iba1 protein expression level in the striatum using western blot. Intensity of Iba1-specific band at 17 kDa was compared among R6/2-MSC, R6/2-PBS and WT-PBS (n = 4 for each group) 7.5 weeks after MSC application. Values were normalized to the level of ß-actin in each lane. Statistical analysis was performed using the student t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM *: p < 0.05. Full western blots are shown in Figure S5A. (B) Representative images of Iba1 staining of striatum-resident microglia in the brain samples obtained in parallel to those analyzed using the western blot. When compared to WT-PBS mice, microglia of R6/2-PBS mice had thinner processes, less process ramification and reduced Iba1 immunoreactivity, whereas MSC treatment (i.e., R6/2-MSC mice) restored Iba1 expression and the thickness of microglial processes. Scale bar in the upper panel: 20 µm, in the lower panel: 8 µm.
Figure 6(A) Increased expression levels of DARPP-32 and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in the striatum of MSC-treated mice. The protein levels of DARPP-32 and TH were analyzed using mice striatal lysates and compared among R6/2-MSC, R6/2-PBS and WT-PBS (n = 4 for each group) 7.5 weeks after MSC application. (B) Both DARPP-32 and TH showed significantly reduced levels in R6/2-PBS mice as compared to WT-PBS mice (student’s t-test), whereas these reductions were ameliorated as R6/2-MSC mice exhibited higher expression levels of DARPP-32 and TH (student’s t-test). There is no difference in protein expression level of synaptic markers synaptophysin and PSD-95 among all three groups. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01. Full western blots are shown in Figure S5B.