| Literature DB >> 31208068 |
Giuseppe Tardiolo1, Placido Bramanti2, Emanuela Mazzon3.
Abstract
Migraine is a disorder affecting an increasing number of subjects. Currently, this disorder is not entirely understood, and limited therapeutic solutions are available. Migraine manifests as a debilitating headache associated with an altered sensory perception that may compromise the quality of life. Animal models have been developed using chemical, physical or genetic modifications, to evoke migraine-like hallmarks for the identification of novel molecules for the treatment of migraine. In this context, experimental models based on the use of chemicals as nitroglycerin or inflammatory soup were extensively used to mimic the acute state and the chronicity of the disorder. This manuscript is aimed to provide an overview of murine models used to investigate migraine pathophysiology. Pharmacological targets as 5-HT and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors were evaluated for their relevance in the development of migraine therapeutics. Drug delivery systems using nanoparticles may be helpful for the enhancement of the brain targeting and bioavailability of anti-migraine drugs as triptans. In conclusion, the progresses in migraine management have been reached with the development of emerging agonists of 5-HT receptors and novel antagonists of CGRP receptors. The nanoformulations may represent a future perspective in which already known anti-migraine drugs showed to better exert their therapeutic effects.Entities:
Keywords: animal models; experimental approaches; migraine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31208068 PMCID: PMC6628212 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20122932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Current pharmacological treatment in migraine.
| Medication | Mechanism of Action | Potential Common Side Effects | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) | Inhibition of the synthesis of prostanoids; cyclooxygenase enzymes (COX-1 and/or COX-2) inhibitors. | Nausea or vomiting, dyspepsia and diarrhea. | [ |
| Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine (DHE) | Agonist to: 5-HT -1B, -1D and -1F receptors; D -1, -2, dopamine receptors. Partial agonists to alpha -1A, -1B, 1D adrenergic receptors. | Nausea and vomiting. | [ |
| beta-blockers (metoprolol, propranolol, timolol) | beta -1, -2, -3, adrenergic receptors blockers. | Bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, diarrhea, bronchospasm, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, and dizziness. | [ |
| Triptans | Agonists to 5-HT -1B,1D receptors | Dizziness, fatigue, dry mouth, flushing, feeling hot or cold, chest pain. | [ |
| Opioids | Agonist µ opioid receptors | Constipation, itchiness, and nausea. | [ |
| Antiepileptic drugs (divalproex sodium, valproate sodium, topiramate) | Sodium channel blockade | Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, diarrhea, drowsiness, constipation and dry mouth. | [ |
| Antiemetics (metoclopramide, prochlorperazine) | Dopamine receptor antagonists | Fatigue, constipation, ringing in the ears, dry mouth, restlessness, and muscle spasms. | [ |
New emerging treatments in migraine.
| New Drugs | FDA Evaluation | Administration | Mechanism of Action | Dosage | Response to Treatment | Common AEs | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erenumab | Approved | SC | IgG2 CGRP receptor blocker | 70 or 140 mg monthly | The percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in migraine days per month, was about 40% and 50% for both dosages in EM and CM. | Injection site pain, URI, fatigue, Nasopharyngitis, constipation, nausea. | [ |
| Fremanezumab | IgG2 CGRP ligand antagonist | 225 mg monthly or 675 mg every 3 months | For both dosages the percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in migraine days per month, was about 40% of CM and 45 % for EM. | Injection site erythema, injection site induration, diarrhea, anxiety, depression. | [ | ||
| Galcanezumab | IgG4 CGRP ligand antagonist | 240 mg loading dose (2 subsequent injections of 120 mg) | The percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in migraine days per month was about 30% of CM and 60 % for EM for both dosages. | Nasopharyngitis, URI, diarrhea, injection site pruritus, injection site erythema. | [ | ||
| Eptinezumab | Not yet approved | IV | IgG1 CGRP ligand antagonist | Dosage ranges 30 to 300 mg | For EM, decreased the average number of migraine-days (30 mg = −4.0; 100 mg = −3.9; and 300 mg = −4.3). For CM, the mean change in migraine days was −8.2 in the 300-mg group. | Nausea, influenza, dizziness, fatigue, URI, UTI. | [ |
| Rimegepant | Oral | CGRP receptor agonist | Dosage ranges 10 to 600 mg | At 2 h post dose, freedom from the most bothersome associated symptoms (MBS) and freedom from pain were reached. Improvements in functional disability were observed, with many patients reporting normal function. | Nausea, UTI. | [ | |
| Ubrogepant | CGRP receptor agonist | Dosage ranges 50 to 100 mg | For both doses, the percentage of patients free from pain at 2 h post administration was about 20% and the percentage of patients free from MBS at 2 h post administration was about 40%. In addition, phonophobia and photophobia resolution at 2 h post administration was reached. | Nausea, somnolence, dizziness. | [ | ||
| Lasmiditan | 5-HT1F receptor agonist | Dosage ranges 50 to 200 mg | The percentage of patients free from headache 2 h post dose was about 30% for 50 and 100 mg, and about 40% for 200 mg. The percentage of patients free from MBS 2 h post dose was about 40% and 45% for 50 and 100 mg, and about 50% for 200 mg. In addition, photophobia and phonophobia resolution was reached. | Dizziness, somnolence, paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea. | [ |
Current animal models of migraine.
| Animal Models | Route of Administration | Description | Response to Treatment | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory soup | Dural cannulation | Mechanical hyperalgesia; reduced locomotor activities; nociceptive behavior; unilateral hind paw; facial grooming; anxiety- and depression-like behaviors; altered CGRP-related genes in the TG and TNC. | Zolmitriptan reduced nociceptive behaviors. Ketorolac reduced the nociceptive behavior, ipsilateral hind paw and facial grooming. Amitriptyline reversed the allodynia and decreased depression- and anxiety-like behaviors. | [ |
| NTG | Intravenously or intraperitoneally | Mechanical hyperalgesia; thermal and mechanical allodynia; photophobia; meningeal blood flow; reduced locomotor activities; facial expressions of pain. | Propranolol, topiramate, and amiloride inhibited mechanical hyperalgesia. Valproic acid were ineffective. Sumatriptan inhibited hypoactivity and grimace scale scores in rats, but resulted in hyperalgesia. | [ |
| MOH | Intraperitoneally | Mechanical hyperalgesia; CSD-related bioelectrical alterations; activation of inflammatory markers in the TG. | Topiramate blocked the enhanced Fos expression in the TNC and inhibited cutaneous allodynia. | [ |
| Genetic model | - | Spontaneous episodic trigeminal allodynia. | Valproic acid prevented the spontaneous changes in trigeminal allodynia. | [ |
| Transgenic models (FHM-1, FHM-2) | - | Photophobia; unilateral head grooming; lateralized winking/blinking. | Rizatriptan reduced head grooming. | [ |
| CSD model | Injections of KCl on the cerebral cortex, or electrical or mechanical stimulation of the cortex | Induced dural activation, vasodilation of meningeal blood vessels. Enhanced neuronal activation at the level of trigemino nuclear complex and in higher cerebral areas of the trigeminal pain pathway. | Valproate, topiramate, propranolol, amitriptyline and methysergide were shown to suppress SD susceptibility. Lamotrigine was also shown to block KCl-induced CSD. | [ |
New compounds and nanoparticles in experimental models.
| Experimental Models | Compounds | Type of Administration | Response to Treatment | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM (NTG-induced) | SNC80 | IP | The administration of the compound showed in all four models | [ |
| PTH (closed head weight drop method combined to NTG) | ||||
| MOH (sumatriptan-induced) | ||||
| OIH (morphine-induced) | ||||
| NTG model | SNC80 or ARM390 or JNJ20788560 | IP | Reduction of NTG-evoked hyperalgesia | [ |
| Gas-D | IG | Reduced head-scratching behavior | [ | |
| CSD (KCl-evoked) | SNC80 | IP | Reduced number of CSD events | [ |
| Electrically evoked meningeal PPE | NOX-L41 | IV or SC | Inhibition of neurogenic meningeal PPE | [ |
| Behavioral studies | RB-SLNs | Orally | The brain uptake potential was 18.43-folds higher with respect to the pure drug in its free form, 2 h post the drug administration. Higher effectiveness in minimizing the number of writhings than the standard pure drug group. Enhanced time spent by animals in the light compartment of the light/dark box model ( | [ |
| SS-chitosan SLNs | The brain uptake potential was 4.54-folds increase in drug targeted to brain, compared to plasma, after 2 h of drug administration. A reduction of the number of writhings ( | [ | ||
| SS-BSA-ApoE NPs | The brain uptake potential of SS was 12.67-folds higher compared to controls, 2 h post drug administration. Reduced writhings events compared to control groups. Enhanced tolerance to light in the light compartment of the light/dark box model compared to controls. | [ | ||
| ZNPs | An increase of 14.13-folds of drug that reached the brain compared to the pure drug was observed. The treatment reduced significantly the number of writhings compared to control ( | [ | ||
| Nystatin-NPs | IP | Major accumulation of NPs in the brain than the other organs considered i.e., liver and spleen, indicating that nanoformulation was successful in reaching the brain through i.p. administration. The nanoformulation induced a decrease in the number of writhings in the acetic acid induced writhings test compared to controls ( | [ | |
| Model of nociceptive durovascular trigeminal activation | Gastrodin, ligustrazine | IV | Gastrodin showed to inhibit nociceptive dural-evoked neuronal firing in the TCC. Ligustrazine showed no relevant effect on spontaneous activity in the TCC. | [ |