BACKGROUND: Early influenza antiviral treatment within 2 days of illness onset can reduce illness severity and duration. Reliance on low sensitivity rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) to guide antiviral prescribing has been reported. We describe antiviral prescribing practices among primary care providers from a large surveillance network in the United States. METHODS: From 2009-2016, a network of 36 to 68 outpatient clinics per year collected respiratory specimens and clinical data for patients with influenza-like illness (ILI). Specimens were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess factors influencing antiviral prescribing. RESULTS: Among 13 540 patients with ILI, 2766 (20%) were prescribed antivirals. In age groups recommended to receive empiric antiviral treatment for suspected influenza, 11% of children <2 years and 23% of adults ≥65 years received a prescription. Among 3681 patients with a positive PCR test for influenza, 40% tested negative by RIDT. In multivariable analysis, prescription receipt was strongly associated with a positive RIDT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12, 95% CI 11-14) and symptom onset ≤2 days before visit (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 3.8-4.9). Antiviral prescribing was also more frequent among pediatric and private family practice clinics compared with community health centers (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2, and 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, respectively). CONCLUSION: Primary care providers were more likely to prescribe antivirals to patients with a positive RIDT, but antivirals were prescribed infrequently even to patients in high-risk age groups. Understanding patient and provider characteristics associated with antiviral prescribing is important for communicating treatment recommendations.
BACKGROUND: Early influenza antiviral treatment within 2 days of illness onset can reduce illness severity and duration. Reliance on low sensitivity rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) to guide antiviral prescribing has been reported. We describe antiviral prescribing practices among primary care providers from a large surveillance network in the United States. METHODS: From 2009-2016, a network of 36 to 68 outpatient clinics per year collected respiratory specimens and clinical data for patients with influenza-like illness (ILI). Specimens were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess factors influencing antiviral prescribing. RESULTS: Among 13 540 patients with ILI, 2766 (20%) were prescribed antivirals. In age groups recommended to receive empiric antiviral treatment for suspected influenza, 11% of children <2 years and 23% of adults ≥65 years received a prescription. Among 3681 patients with a positive PCR test for influenza, 40% tested negative by RIDT. In multivariable analysis, prescription receipt was strongly associated with a positive RIDT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12, 95% CI 11-14) and symptom onset ≤2 days before visit (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 3.8-4.9). Antiviral prescribing was also more frequent among pediatric and private family practice clinics compared with community health centers (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2, and 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, respectively). CONCLUSION: Primary care providers were more likely to prescribe antivirals to patients with a positive RIDT, but antivirals were prescribed infrequently even to patients in high-risk age groups. Understanding patient and provider characteristics associated with antiviral prescribing is important for communicating treatment recommendations.
Entities:
Keywords:
antiviral treatment; influenza; neuraminidase inhibitors; primary care
Authors: Michael B Rothberg; Aleta B Bonner; M Hasan Rajab; Hyun Sun Kim; Barbara W Stechenberg; David N Rose Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2005-11-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: A S Monto; D M Fleming; D Henry; R de Groot; M Makela; T Klein; M Elliott; O N Keene; C Y Man Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: F G Hayden; R L Atmar; M Schilling; C Johnson; D Poretz; D Paar; L Huson; P Ward; R G Mills Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-10-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Nancy Cox; Larry J Anderson; Keiji Fukuda Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Carolyn B Bridges; Nancy J Cox; Keiji Fukuda Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cristalyne Bell; Maureen Goss; Jennifer Birstler; Emily Temte; Guanhua Chen; Peter Shult; Erik Reisdorf; Thomas Haupt; Shari Barlow; Jonathan Temte Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Ji Young Lee; Seung Hwan Baek; Jong Gyun Ahn; Seo Hee Yoon; Moon Kyu Kim; Soo Yeon Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Myung Hyun Sohn; Ji-Man Kang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Shana A B Burrowes; Tamar F Barlam; Alexandra Skinner; Rebecca Berger; Pengsheng Ni; Mari-Lynn Drainoni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 3.240