BACKGROUND: Youth athletes are starting sports earlier and training harder. Intense, year-round demands are encouraging early sports specialization under the perception that it will improve the odds of future elite performance. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that early specialization is associated with increased risk of injury and burnout. This is especially true of pediatric and adolescent baseball players. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this investigation was to analyze national injury trends of youth baseball players. We hypothesized that while the total number of baseball injuries diagnosed over the past decade would decrease, there would be an increase in adolescent elbow injuries seen nationally. A further hypothesis was that this trend would be significantly greater than other injuries to the upper extremity and major joints. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Injury data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, a United States Consumer Product Safety Commission database, were analyzed between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016, for baseball players aged ≤18 years. Data were collected on the location of injury, diagnosis, and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2016, an estimated 665,133 baseball injuries occurred nationally. The mean age of the injured players was 11.5 years. The most common injuries diagnosed included contusions (26.8%), fractures (23.6%), and strains and sprains (18.7%). Among major joints, the ankle (25.6%) was most commonly injured, followed by the knee (21.3%), wrist (19.2%), elbow (17.7%), and shoulder (16.2%). The incidence of the ankle, knee, wrist, and shoulder injuries decreased over time, while only the incidence of elbow injuries increased. A linear regression analysis demonstrated that the increasing incidence of elbow injuries was statistically significant against the decreasing trend for all baseball injury diagnoses, as well as ankle, knee, wrist, hand, and finger injuries (P < .05). Additionally, the only elbow injury mechanism that increased substantially over time was throwing. CONCLUSION: The current investigation found that while the incidence of baseball injuries sustained by youth players is decreasing, elbow pathology is becoming more prevalent and is more commonly being caused by throwing. Given that the majority of elbow injuries among adolescent baseball players are overuse injuries, these findings underscore the importance of developing strategies to continue to ensure the safety of these youth athletes.
BACKGROUND: Youth athletes are starting sports earlier and training harder. Intense, year-round demands are encouraging early sports specialization under the perception that it will improve the odds of future elite performance. Unfortunately, there is growing evidence that early specialization is associated with increased risk of injury and burnout. This is especially true of pediatric and adolescent baseball players. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this investigation was to analyze national injury trends of youth baseball players. We hypothesized that while the total number of baseball injuries diagnosed over the past decade would decrease, there would be an increase in adolescent elbow injuries seen nationally. A further hypothesis was that this trend would be significantly greater than other injuries to the upper extremity and major joints. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Injury data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, a United States Consumer Product Safety Commission database, were analyzed between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016, for baseball players aged ≤18 years. Data were collected on the location of injury, diagnosis, and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2016, an estimated 665,133 baseball injuries occurred nationally. The mean age of the injured players was 11.5 years. The most common injuries diagnosed included contusions (26.8%), fractures (23.6%), and strains and sprains (18.7%). Among major joints, the ankle (25.6%) was most commonly injured, followed by the knee (21.3%), wrist (19.2%), elbow (17.7%), and shoulder (16.2%). The incidence of the ankle, knee, wrist, and shoulder injuries decreased over time, while only the incidence of elbow injuries increased. A linear regression analysis demonstrated that the increasing incidence of elbow injuries was statistically significant against the decreasing trend for all baseball injury diagnoses, as well as ankle, knee, wrist, hand, and finger injuries (P < .05). Additionally, the only elbow injury mechanism that increased substantially over time was throwing. CONCLUSION: The current investigation found that while the incidence of baseball injuries sustained by youth players is decreasing, elbow pathology is becoming more prevalent and is more commonly being caused by throwing. Given that the majority of elbow injuries among adolescent baseball players are overuse injuries, these findings underscore the importance of developing strategies to continue to ensure the safety of these youth athletes.
Youth athletes today are being increasingly subjected to extreme performance demands that
have resulted in early sports specialization.[5] However, early specialization has not been shown to improve the odds of future
elite-level status; instead, it has been associated with increased rates of overuse
injuries, burnout, decreased motivation for play, and increased psychological stress.[5,13-15] Given that youth injuries can impose significant immediate and long-term
consequences, including risk of future injuries, cognitive deficits, and other health
burdens, they are imperative to prevent.Unfortunately, overuse injuries of the upper extremity among baseball players are being
increasingly recognized by sports medicine professionals.[3,9,18] Makhni et al[19] found that anywhere from 30% to 70% of throwers, usually pitchers, develop pain
in their throwing arms at some point. Even more concerning, the same study found that
players reported being encouraged to play through pain, thus increasing the chance of
sustaining an overuse injury. This is particularly concerning, as a national survey
study of 754 youth pitchers performed by Yang et al[24] found that those who threw through their fatigue and pain had >7 times the
odds of sustaining a pitching-related injury. One throwing-related injury that has
received a great deal of recent media attention involves rupture of the ulnar collateral
ligament. Hodgins et al[11] investigated the epidemiology of ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions in the
state of New York and found that although the mean age for surgery was 21.6 years, there
was an increasing trend for surgical treatment among patients aged 17 and 18 years. Such
data have spurred national efforts emphasizing public education on the risks of overuse
throwing injuries among adolescents and the significance of adhering to preventative
guidelines.Prior investigations have utilized the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System
(NEISS) to characterize injury types, rates, and mechanisms in various sports.[4,12,25] Lawson et al[16] used the NEISS database to evaluate baseball injuries among players younger than
18 years presenting to United States (US) emergency departments between 1994 and 2006.
Over this time frame, the authors identified a 24.9% decline in the annual number of
injuries sustained during baseball. However, the authors did not look at specific
injuries or diagnoses or the trends in the location of injuries over time. The purpose
of the current investigation was to expand on the work of Lawson et al[16] with the NEISS database to further characterize youth baseball injuries. We
hypothesized that the trend seen by Lawson et al[16]—a decrease in the number of total baseball injuries diagnosed over time—will
continue. However, given the recent trends seen nationally in the setting of early
specialization and overuse injuries, we also hypothesized that certain injuries,
specifically of the elbow, will have increased over the past decade. Such a finding
would be significant as health care providers, coaches, parents, and youth sports
organizers continue to try to mitigate the risk of preventable injuries among young
athletes.
Methods
The NEISS, a publicly available US Consumer Product Safety Commission database,
collects information from 100 nationally representative, randomly selected emergency departments.[4,12,23,25] These departments were selected after all US hospitals were stratified by
geographic location, size, and emergency department volume data. Each selected
hospital is assigned a statistical sample weight that allows the database to
estimate national representative samples. By assigning to each patient a Consumer
Product Safety Commission–specific product code, which designates products used
and/or activities engaged in at the time of injury, the NEISS is able to generate
reliable and reproducible epidemiologic data regarding US emergency department
visits.We analyzed all cases with a baseball product code (5041) from January 1, 2006, to
December 31, 2016, for baseball players aged ≤18 years. A total of 15,925 cases were
identified. The narrative provided for each injury was reviewed to ensure that it
was sustained while playing baseball. Injuries sustained while not playing baseball
were excluded, leaving 15,389 cases. The NEISS provides national estimates of
injuries based on the number of cases diagnosed at the 100 emergency departments
participating in the database.Data were collected on the location of injury, emergency department diagnosis, and
mechanism of injury. There were 26 possible locations of injury, divided into 5
groups: face, head and neck, upper extremity, lower extremity, and core. Injury
diagnoses investigated included concussions, contusions, dislocations, fractures,
internal organ injury, laceration, strains, and other. Mechanism of injury was
broken down into 5 categories: hit by bat, hit by ball, sliding, throwing, and other
(which included nonspecific narratives such as “injured while playing
baseball”).Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism (v 7.0b; GraphPad Software).
Statistical significance for trends was determined with a linear regression
analysis, while significance for continuous data was determined with a chi-square
test. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05.
Results
Between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016, the total number of baseball injuries
diagnosed in emergency departments included in the NEISS database was 15,389,
resulting in a national estimate of 665,133 related baseball injuries. The mean age
of the players sustaining injuries was 11.5 years. Between 2006 and 2016, the
estimated number of injuries decreased by 11.7%, from an estimated 61,997 injuries
to 54,777 (Figure 1). The
most common site of injury was the upper extremity, accounting for 36.3% of all
baseball injuries, followed by injuries to the face (26.2%), lower extremity
(18.3%), head and neck (13.6%), and core (5.6%) (Figure 2). Regarding diagnoses, contusions
(26.8%), fractures (23.6%), strains and sprains (18.7%), and lacerations (11.7%)
were most commonly seen in emergency departments (Figure 3).
Figure 1.
Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments according to year of injury, 2006 to
2016.
Figure 2.
Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments according to location of injury among
pediatric baseball players between 2006 and 2016.
Figure 3.
Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments according to diagnosis among pediatric
baseball players between 2006 and 2016.
Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments according to year of injury, 2006 to
2016.Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments according to location of injury among
pediatric baseball players between 2006 and 2016.Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments according to diagnosis among pediatric
baseball players between 2006 and 2016.Injury trends for specific body parts were also investigated. First, injuries to
major joints were assessed, including the ankle, knee, shoulder, elbow, and wrist.
Among these, the ankle (25.6%) and knee (21.3%) were most commonly injured (Figure 4A). Overall, the elbow
was implicated in 17.7% of all injuries to major joints during the study,
representing an estimated 31,933 total injuries. Injuries to the shoulder, wrist,
knee, and ankle were all found to have a decreasing incidence; however, elbow
diagnoses increased (Figure
4B). Furthermore, a linear regression analysis found significant
differences between the incidence of elbow injuries and injuries to the ankle
(P = .018), knee (P = .030), and wrist
(P = .006). There was no significant difference in the trends
between shoulder and elbow injuries (P > .05).
Figure 4.
(A) Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments characterized by major joints injured. (B)
Trends in major joint injuries among pediatric baseball players between 2006
and 2016.
(A) Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments characterized by major joints injured. (B)
Trends in major joint injuries among pediatric baseball players between 2006
and 2016.Injury trends of the upper extremity were further elucidated to compare with elbow
injuries. These included injuries to the fingers, hand, wrist, lower arm, elbow,
upper arm, and shoulder. Of these, injuries to the fingers were most common,
accounting for 32.0% of injuries to the upper extremity, followed by the wrist
(15.5%) and elbow (14.2%) (Figure
5A). There were no documented injuries to the upper arm. As with injuries
to the major joints, upper extremity injuries except for those to the elbow were all
found to decrease over time (Figure
5B). A linear regression analysis showed that the incidence of elbow
injuries was significant as compared with the incidence of finger
(P < .001) and hand (P = .013) injuries but
not compared with lower arm injuries (P = .131).
Figure 5.
(A) Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments characterized by different upper extremity
injuries. (B) Trends in upper extremity injuries among pediatric baseball
players between 2006 and 2016 (wrist and shoulder injuries not
included).
(A) Estimated number of pediatric baseball-related injuries treated in US
hospital emergency departments characterized by different upper extremity
injuries. (B) Trends in upper extremity injuries among pediatric baseball
players between 2006 and 2016 (wrist and shoulder injuries not
included).Specific elbow diagnoses were also examined. The most common diagnoses included
contusions (35.8%), strains and sprains (23.0%), fractures (21.2%), and other
(17.2%). Trends in these diagnoses between 2006 and 2016 were investigated (Figure 6). The only
significant trend identified was a large decrease in contusions presenting to
emergency departments. Although strains and sprains, fractures, and other diagnoses
all increased over time, these trends were not statistically significant.
Figure 6.
Trends in the percentage of elbow diagnoses between 2006 and 2016.
Trends in the percentage of elbow diagnoses between 2006 and 2016.Last, baseball injury mechanisms included “hit by bat” (4.4%), “hit by ball” (38.2%),
sliding (9.9%), throwing (2.8%), and other (44.7%). Of the investigated mechanisms,
throwing caused the least number of baseball-related injuries but was responsible
for a higher percentage (23.8%) of elbow injuries than any other type of injury,
including injuries to the shoulder (17.1%). The 23.8% of elbow injuries caused by
throwing represents an estimated 7600 injuries seen during the study time frame
nationally. The distribution of injury mechanisms between elbow and all baseball
injuries was significantly different (P < .001) (Figure 7A). Finally, the
trends in elbow injury mechanisms between 2006 and 2016 were investigated (Figure 7B). The only mechanism
of injury that increased substantially over time was throwing. A linear regression
analysis found that the increasing trend in elbow throwing injuries was significant
as compared with the incidence of injuries caused by being hit by a bat
(P = .017), being hit by a ball (P = .002),
sliding (P = .003), and other mechanisms (P =
.039).
Figure 7.
(A) Comparison of the distribution of injury mechanisms between all
baseball-related injuries and elbow-related injuries. A chi-square analysis
showed that the distribution was significantly different (P
< .001). (B) Trends in the percentage of elbow injuries caused by various
mechanisms between 2006 and 2016.
(A) Comparison of the distribution of injury mechanisms between all
baseball-related injuries and elbow-related injuries. A chi-square analysis
showed that the distribution was significantly different (P
< .001). (B) Trends in the percentage of elbow injuries caused by various
mechanisms between 2006 and 2016.
Discussion
The most significant finding of this study is that between 2006 and 2016 the only
location of injury that saw an increase in diagnosis was the elbow. Furthermore, the
increasing rate of elbow diagnoses made in US emergency departments was
significantly greater than the trend seen for all baseball injuries, as well as for
injuries to the knee, ankle, wrist, hand, and fingers. Although the exact cause of
these trends cannot be fully elucidated by the methods of the current investigation,
we hypothesize that the trend toward early sports specialization and associated
overuse injuries played a role in the growing number of elbow injuries diagnosed.
This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the mechanism of elbow injury that saw
the greatest increase over time was throwing. Further support for this conclusion
comes from Saper et al,[22] who in 2018 performed an epidemiologic study on shoulder and elbow injuries
among high school baseball players between 2005 and 2015. With regard to their
identified mechanisms of injury, the authors found that overuse and noncontact
injuries accounted for the majority of shoulder (71.3%) and elbow (73.9%) injuries.
A similar conclusion was drawn by Fleisig and Andrews[8] in 2012.It is also interesting to note that Saper et al[22] found injury rates of 1.39 and 0.86 per 10,000 athlete-exposures for the
shoulder and elbow, respectively, among high school students. This is in contrast to
the current investigation, which identified a higher overall number of elbow
injuries on a national level. If our hypothesis that the increasing volume of elbow
pathology among these pediatric and adolescent baseball players is a result of
overuse, then there are certain modifiable risk factors that can be addressed. These
include, but are not limited to, high-velocity pitching (>85 miles per hour),
participation in showcases, pitching on >1 team, high pitch counts, pitching
while fatigued, and poor pitching mechanics.[2,8,20] Knowledge of these risk factors has led to national efforts aimed at
developing strategies to reduce the overall injury burden—namely, pitch count
limitations and recommended lengths of rest between pitching sessions.[7,21] As our data and those of Saper et al[22] suggest, these preventative interventions may require further education among
coaches, parents, and players as well as stricter adherence within youth leagues to
mitigate the risks of overuse injury. Other studies have investigated this subject
specifically. For instance, Fazarale et al[6] performed a survey investigation of 228 coaches who correctly answered only
43% of questions related to pitch count and rest periods. Even more concerning, 19%
of these coaches admitted to allowing at least 1 pitcher to continue playing when
fatigued.The results of the current investigation also corroborate findings described by
Lawson et al[16] in 2009. For example, the number of baseball injuries diagnosed in emergency
departments across the nation has continued to decrease. The cause of this is likely
multifactorial, but a major factor may be convenience, as many patients likely have
the option of presenting to primary care physicians, specialists, and/or urgent care
clinics as opposed to the emergency department. Another similarity between these 2
studies is that soft tissue injuries remain the most common type of injury
sustained.There are also key differences between these investigations. First, Lawson et al[16] identified the face (33.5%) as the most common location of injury between
1994 and 2006, followed by the upper extremity (32.4%). Between 2006 and 2016,
however, the upper extremity was most commonly injured (36.3%), with subsequent
analyses showing that nearly one-third of all upper extremity injuries were to the
fingers. Interestingly, despite being the most commonly diagnosed location of injury
over the study time frame, finger diagnoses decreased by 39.0%. Furthermore, if the
current trend continues, the elbow will soon become the most commonly diagnosed
upper extremity injury. This is not surprising, as elbow pain is becoming
increasingly diagnosed among youth throwers, with studies reporting an incidence of
20% to 30% for 8- to 12-year-olds, 45% for 13- to 14-year-olds, and >50% for high
school and college baseball players.[10,17,18]Limitations to this study include all the biases inherent to utilizing a large
national database. Additionally, our methodology did not permit an analysis on the
severity of injuries as measured by time missed from play or need for surgical
intervention. Prior investigations were able to demonstrate significant morbidity
related to elbow injuries, with 22.1% resulting in an inability to return to play
for >3 weeks.[22] Another limitation involved the evaluation of injury mechanisms.
Specifically, 44.7% of all injuries had a mechanism classified as “other” owing to a
combination of infrequently described mechanisms, such as running into a fence, or a
lack of descriptive information provided in the narrative.Additionally, although the main purpose of this investigation was to identify and
characterize trends in baseball injuries, we cannot fully elucidate the cause of
those trends. While we believe that early specialization and overuse injuries play a
significant role, we are unable to prove this hypothesis with the current
methodology. The reason is primarily that the majority of injuries presenting to
emergency departments are acute traumatic injuries, and we are assuming that certain
mechanisms, such as throwing, represent nontraumatic overuse injuries. However, it
is important to note that overuse injuries can also present as acute exacerbations
requiring medical attention, such as increasing medial elbow pain attributed to
worsening apophysitis or, even more severe, a medial epicondyle epiphyseal avulsion.
Despite this limitation, there is currently no alternative or superior method of
investigating overuse injuries in this vulnerable patient population on a national
level. Other possibilities for the increasing trend of elbow diagnoses include the
heightened publicity that elbow injuries have received in the media, leading players
and parents to be increasingly cognizant or concerned about a potential injury.Finally, as discussed, while utilization of the NEISS does allow for analysis of
trends, we are unable to calculate the true incidence of injuries, as the
denominator remains unknown. Despite these limitations, the NEISS data set is an
effective tool that has been used in investigations to assess injury patterns in a
number of sports and that allowed us to effectively examine a national
representative sample of baseball injuries.
Conclusion
There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating that young baseball players are
increasingly susceptible to elbow injuries. Furthermore, in recent years, an
increasing number of these injuries are being caused by throwing. This is despite
increased public awareness and recent national efforts aimed at lowering injuries in
throwers. As such, new initiatives continue to be developed to limit early sports
specialization, prevent overuse injuries, and keep youth players healthy.[1,15] Further analysis of these efforts through large-scale prospective
investigations will be necessary to appropriately evaluate the effect of these
protective measures on injury rates.
Authors: Brian R Waterman; Brett D Owens; Shaunette Davey; Michael A Zacchilli; Philip J Belmont Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Glenn S Fleisig; James R Andrews; Gary R Cutter; Adam Weber; Jeremy Loftice; Chris McMichael; Nina Hassell; Stephen Lyman Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: S Lyman; G S Fleisig; J W Waterbor; E M Funkhouser; L Pulley; J R Andrews; E D Osinski; J M Roseman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Justin C Kennon; Erick M Marigi; Chad E Songy; Chris Bernard; Shawn W O'Driscoll; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Christopher L Camp Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: Hasani W Swindell; David P Trofa; Jamie Confino; Julian J Sonnenfeld; Frank J Alexander; Christopher S Ahmad Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Kyle A Matsel; Stephanie N Brown; Matt C Hoch; Robert J Butler; Philip M Westgate; Terry R Malone; Tim L Uhl Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Kyle K Obana; John D Mueller; Bryan M Saltzman; Thomas S Bottiglieri; Christopher S Ahmad; Robert L Parisien; David P Trofa Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-10-15
Authors: Tyler J Hamer; Adam B Rosen; Samuel J Wilkins; Kristen F Nicholson; Garrett S Bullock; Brian A Knarr Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2022-08-01