| Literature DB >> 31204610 |
Sheri A Rowland1, Marlene Z Cohen2, Carol H Pullen2, Paula S Schulz1, Kris E Berg3, Kevin A Kupzyk2, Bunny J Pozehl2, Bernice C Yates2.
Abstract
People compare themselves to others for self-evaluation, practical information, and motivation for healthy behaviors. The effect of active peer models on comparative thinking is unknown. The purpose of this 12-week, randomized, two-group pilot study was to evaluate the effect of a workplace peer modeling intervention on self-efficacy, motivation, and comparative thinking. The attention control group (ACG; n = 24) received general health information. The intervention group (n = 26) met with active peer models, received an exercise prescription and information. No significant group by time interaction effects were found. Comparisons on ability (how well am I doing), opinions (what should I think or believe), future self (think about my future), and modeling (be like someone else) all increased in the intervention group (n = 21) but decreased in the ACG (n = 22). Active peer models may support physical activity behavior change through specific lines of comparative thinking.Entities:
Keywords: peer modeling; physical activity; social comparison; vicarious experience; workplace
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31204610 PMCID: PMC9179930 DOI: 10.1177/0193945919856575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: West J Nurs Res ISSN: 0193-9459 Impact factor: 1.774