Literature DB >> 31204610

Vicarious Experience to Affect Physical Activity in Women: A Randomized Control Trial.

Sheri A Rowland1, Marlene Z Cohen2, Carol H Pullen2, Paula S Schulz1, Kris E Berg3, Kevin A Kupzyk2, Bunny J Pozehl2, Bernice C Yates2.   

Abstract

People compare themselves to others for self-evaluation, practical information, and motivation for healthy behaviors. The effect of active peer models on comparative thinking is unknown. The purpose of this 12-week, randomized, two-group pilot study was to evaluate the effect of a workplace peer modeling intervention on self-efficacy, motivation, and comparative thinking. The attention control group (ACG; n = 24) received general health information. The intervention group (n = 26) met with active peer models, received an exercise prescription and information. No significant group by time interaction effects were found. Comparisons on ability (how well am I doing), opinions (what should I think or believe), future self (think about my future), and modeling (be like someone else) all increased in the intervention group (n = 21) but decreased in the ACG (n = 22). Active peer models may support physical activity behavior change through specific lines of comparative thinking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  peer modeling; physical activity; social comparison; vicarious experience; workplace

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31204610      PMCID: PMC9179930          DOI: 10.1177/0193945919856575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.774


  17 in total

1.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 2.  Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies.

Authors:  Melody A Hertzog
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on.

Authors:  J P Gerber; Ladd Wheeler; Jerry Suls
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Affiliative preferences, self-change, and adolescent condom use.

Authors:  B B Tigges
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.176

5.  Goals and Social Comparisons Promote Walking Behavior.

Authors:  Gretchen B Chapman; Helen Colby; Kimberly Convery; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Vicki S Conn; Adam R Hafdahl; David R Mehr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Psychometric properties of the Social Comparison Motives Scale.

Authors:  Beth Baldwin Tigges
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2009

8.  Assessing the Effects of Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Behavior Change Strategies on Physical Activity in Older Adults: a Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  Siobhan K McMahon; Beth Lewis; J Michael Oakes; Jean F Wyman; Weihua Guan; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-06

9.  Sunburn reduction through parental role modeling and sunscreen vigilance.

Authors:  David L O'Riordan; Alan C Geller; Daniel R Brooks; Zi Zhang; Donald R Miller
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Feasibility and Effect of a Peer Modeling Workplace Physical Activity Intervention for Women.

Authors:  Sheri A Rowland; Kris E Berg; Kevin A Kupzyk; Carol H Pullen; Marlene Z Cohen; Paula S Schulz; Bernice C Yates
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.