Literature DB >> 26139447

Goals and Social Comparisons Promote Walking Behavior.

Gretchen B Chapman1, Helen Colby2, Kimberly Convery1, Elliot J Coups3.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of a pedometer intervention was affected by manipulating the goals given to participants and by providing social comparison feedback about how participants' performance compared with others. In study 1 (n= 148), university staff members received a low, medium, or high walking goal (10%, 50%, or 100% increase over baseline walking). Participants walked 1358 more steps per day (95% confidence interval [CI], 729, 1985), when receiving a high goal than when receiving a medium goal, but a medium goal did not increase walking relative to a low goal (554 more steps; 95% CI, -71,1179). In study 2 (n= 64), participants received individual feedback only or individual plus social comparison feedback. Participants walked 1120 more steps per day (95% CI, 538, 1703) when receiving social comparison feedback than when receiving only individual feedback. Goals and the performance of others act as reference points and influence the effect that pedometer feedback has on walking behavior, illustrating the applicability of the principles of behavioral economics and social psychology to the design of health behavior interventions.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior change; goals; pedometer; physical activity; reference point; social comparison; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26139447     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X15592156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  6 in total

1.  Put Your Imperfections Behind You: Temporal Landmarks Spur Goal Initiation When They Signal New Beginnings.

Authors:  Hengchen Dai; Katherine L Milkman; Jason Riis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  A Comparison of Activity Monitor Data from Devices Worn on the Wrist and the Waist in People with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Leanne M Hassett; Vanessa Nguy; Natalie E Allen
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2019-10-18

3.  Vicarious Experience to Affect Physical Activity in Women: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Sheri A Rowland; Marlene Z Cohen; Carol H Pullen; Paula S Schulz; Kris E Berg; Kevin A Kupzyk; Bunny J Pozehl; Bernice C Yates
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 1.774

4.  Just-in-Time Feedback in Diet and Physical Activity Interventions: Systematic Review and Practical Design Framework.

Authors:  Susan M Schembre; Yue Liao; Michael C Robertson; Genevieve Fridlund Dunton; Jacqueline Kerr; Meghan E Haffey; Taylor Burnett; Karen Basen-Engquist; Rachel S Hicklen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Statistical methods to model and evaluate physical activity programs, using step counts: A systematic review.

Authors:  S S M Silva; Madawa W Jayawardana; Denny Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gender-Specific Impact of Self-Monitoring and Social Norm Information on Walking Behavior Among Chinese College Students Assessed Using WeChat: Longitudinal Tracking Study.

Authors:  Yuepei Xu; Ling-Zi Yue; Wei Wang; Xiao-Ju Wu; Zhu-Yuan Liang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.