| Literature DB >> 31204485 |
Sarah Ellen Braun1, George Deeb1, Caroline Carrico1, Patricia A Kinser1.
Abstract
The present study investigated whether a brief yoga intervention would be feasible and acceptable for dental students. Based on empirical evidence about state mindfulness (SM), change in self-reported SM was assessed as a measure of the intervention's feasibility and acceptability. A repeated-measures within-subjects design was used. Participants were third- and fourth-year dental and dental hygiene students (76% female). The State Mindfulness Scale (SMS), a validated self-report measure of SM with 2 subscales, Mind and Body, was used. Students (n = 132) completed the SMS immediately prior to and following a 1-hour yoga intervention. Dispositional mindfulness, burnout, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms were also investigated as moderators of changes in state mindfulness to determine whether psychological variables had an effect on feasibility in this sample. Total SM significantly increased from pre- to post-intervention, t(46) = 10.26, P < .001. An analysis of covariance showed a significant interaction effect in the relationship between pre-/post-intervention SM of Mind (β = 0.51, P = .048), such that higher levels of stress saw greater increases in SM of Mind. No other psychological variables were significant moderators. A brief yoga intervention for dental students significantly increased SM, suggesting that yoga interventions may be feasible and acceptable in this population. The results of moderation analyses suggest that a brief yoga intervention may be especially effective at increasing SM for those with high levels of stress. Future research should use a randomized control group to test group differences in SM after a brief yoga intervention for dental students.Entities:
Keywords: dental hygiene students; dental students; perceived stress; state mindfulness; yoga
Year: 2019 PMID: 31204485 PMCID: PMC6580712 DOI: 10.1177/2515690X19855303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evid Based Integr Med ISSN: 2515-690X
Sample Demographics.a
| Variable | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Year in school | |
| DH 1 | 6 (13) |
| DH 2 | 5 (11) |
| DDS 3 | 22 (47) |
| DDS 4 | 14 (30) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 12 (26) |
| Female | 35 (74) |
| Race/ethnicity | |
| White (non-Hispanic) | 36 (77) |
| Asian | 7 (15) |
| Other | 4 (9) |
| Marital/Partner status | |
| Single/divorced | 30 (64) |
| Married/partnered | 17 (36) |
| Have children | 8 (17) |
| Currently exercise | 30 (64) |
Abbreviations: DH 1, dental hygienist student, year 1; DH 2, dental hygienist student, year 2; DDS, dental student, year 3; DDS 4, dental student, year 4.
aDemographics were collected from the larger sample of students (n = 132) who completed the online survey within 1 week prior to the intervention. However, only 47 were included due to a matching identifier to link to the state mindfulness measures completed pre- and postintervention. Therefore, demographics are reported here for n = 47 participants.
Average SMS Measures and Standard Deviations for All Participants and Rate of Improvement (N = 132).
| α | Preintervention Score, Mean (SD) | Postintervention Score, Mean (SD) | Difference, Mean (SD) |
| Rate of Improvement, n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMS Total | 0.95 | 71.3 (15.3) | 89.7 (12.1) | 18.4 (15.6) | <.0001 | 115 (87) |
| SMS Mind | — | 51.4 (11.1) | 63.3 (9.1) | 11.9 (11.7) | <.0001 | 112 (85) |
| SMS Body | — | 19.9 (4.8) | 26.4 (3.4) | 6.6 (5.0) | <.0001 | 117 (89) |
Abbreviation: SMS, State Mindfulness Scale.
a P-value from paired t test.
Analysis of Covariance Results (n = 47).
| Psychological Measure | α |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMS Body | SMS Mind | SMS Total | ||
| MBI EE Proxy | — | .5235 | .4638 | .4544 |
| MBI DP Proxy | — | .3152 | .0763 | .1059 |
| FFMQsf DS | 0.88 | .3045 | .9151 | .7846 |
| FFMQsf NR | 0.78 | .6698 | .1966 | .2966 |
| FFMQsf NJ | 0.81 | .9009 | .6796 | .7677 |
| FFMQsf OB | 0.86 | .0642 | .2950 | .1471 |
| FFMQsf AA | 0.85 | .1272 | .0716 | .0761 |
| PSS10 | 0.86 | .2767 | .0476b | .0720 |
| PHQ9 | 0.87 | .3760 | .3341 | .3106 |
Abbreviations: SMS, State Mindfulness Scale; MBI, Maslach Burnout Inventory; EE, Emotional Exhaustion subscale; DP, Depersonalization subscale; FFMQsf, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire–short form; DS, describe; NR, nonreactivity to inner experience; NJ, nonjudging of inner experience; OB, observe; AA, acting with awareness.
aAdjusting for baseline SMS Body, Mind, or Total as appropriate.
bStatistically significant modifier, P < .05.
Figure 1.Visual demonstration of effect of perceived stress on change in SMS Mind. Visual demonstration of the interaction between PSS10 and SMS. If 2 subjects have the same baseline SMS Mind score but one has a 2-point higher PSS10 score, the subject with the higher PSS10 is predicted to have a greater improvement in SMS Mind at the follow-up. n = 47; SMS, State Mindfulness Scale; PSS, Perceived Stress Scale.