| Literature DB >> 31202815 |
Michael Eiden1, Nicolas Christinat2, Anirikh Chakrabarti2, Sarah Sonnay2, John-Paul Miroz3, Bernard Cuenoud4, Mauro Oddo3, Mojgan Masoodi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recognized as a metabolic disease, characterized by acute cerebral glucose hypo-metabolism. Adaptive metabolic responses to TBI involve the utilization of alternative energy substrates, such as ketone bodies. Cerebral microdialysis (CMD) has evolved as an accurate technique allowing continuous sampling of brain extracellular fluid and assessment of regional cerebral metabolism. We present the successful application of a combined hypothesis- and data-driven metabolomics approach using repeated CMD sampling obtained routinely at patient bedside. Investigating two patient cohorts (n = 26 and n = 12), we identified clinically relevant metabolic patterns at the acute post-TBI critical care phase.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral microdialysis; Ketometabolism; Metabolic state; Traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31202815 PMCID: PMC6606955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EBioMedicine ISSN: 2352-3964 Impact factor: 8.143
Fig. 1Schematic diagram outlining the workflow of the study. (Panel a was reproduced with friendly permission of https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5031-6).
Patient demographics in the development and validation cohort.
| Study 1 | Study 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects (M/F) | 26 (6/20) | 12 (9/3) |
| Average Age [y] (SD) | 44.1 (17.0) | 56.7 (18.1) |
| Average Weight [kg] (SD) | 80.7 (17.1) | 84.6 (12.8) |
| Average Height [cm] (SD) | 175.2 (7.5) | 172.7 (6.5) |
| Average Glasgow Outcome Score [1](SD) | 3.14 (1.39) | N/A |
| Average Therapeutic Intensity Score [1](SD) | 2.54 (1.07) | 2.93 (0.75) |
| Number of deceased patients | 5 | N/A |
Fig. 2Metabolic states derived using hierarchical cluster analysis.
Fig. 4Temporal distribution of identified metabolic states (blue = “A”, red = ”B”) across patient trajectories. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Significantly different metabolites between metabolic states.
| Metabolite | P-value after FDR correction | Significant |
|---|---|---|
| Valine | 1.896E-142 | Yes |
| 4-Methyl-2-oxovaleric acid | 9.782E-138 | Yes |
| iso-BHB | 1.629E-131 | Yes |
| Tyrosine | 4.966E-130 | Yes |
| 2-Ketoisovaleric acid | 2.701E-124 | Yes |
| Leucine | 9.875E-118 | Yes |
| Threonine | 1.058E-116 | Yes |
| Phenylalanine | 5.296E-116 | Yes |
| Methionine | 1.883E-110 | Yes |
| Butyrylcarnitine | 9.731E-101 | Yes |
| 3-Hydroxyisovaleric acid | 6.713E-94 | Yes |
| Isoleucine | 1.699E-90 | Yes |
| 3-Methyl-2-oxovaleric acid | 7.877E-89 | Yes |
| Propionylcarnitine | 1.803E-86 | Yes |
| 3-Hydroxydecanoic acid | 3.331E-84 | Yes |
| 3-Hydroxyhexanoic acid | 9.483E-84 | Yes |
| Glutarylcarnitine | 9.236E-71 | Yes |
| Hexanoylcarnitine | 9.288E-68 | Yes |
| Octanoylcarnitine | 1.600E-63 | Yes |
| Decanoylcarnitine | 3.754E-63 | Yes |
| 2-Hydroxybutyric acid | 5.106E-60 | Yes |
| 3-Hydroxypentanoic acid | 8.771E-48 | Yes |
| Pyroglutamic acid | 9.028E-47 | Yes |
| 2-Hydroxyisovaleric acid | 1.229E-46 | Yes |
| Pantothenic acid | 6.759E-44 | Yes |
| 3-Hydroxyoctanoic acid | 4.141E-41 | Yes |
| Suberic acid | 3.607E-32 | Yes |
| Glutamic acid | 5.747E-27 | Yes |
| Acetoacetate | 2.480E-24 | Yes |
| 2-Hydroxydecanoic acid | 7.342E-20 | Yes |
| Sebacic acid | 1.185E-16 | Yes |
| 8-Hydroxyoctanoic acid | 9.649E-16 | Yes |
| Hexanoic acid | 7.387E-14 | Yes |
| 2-Hydroxyoctanoic acid | 2.015E-12 | Yes |
| BHB | 1.257E-09 | Yes |
| Decanoic acid | 6.882E-09 | Yes |
| 10-Hydroxydecanoic acid | 6.510E-04 | Yes |
| Taurine | 1.418E-03 | Yes |
| Octanoic acid | 6.721E-02 | No |
| Dodecanoic acid | 5.791E-01 | No |
Fig. 3a. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the metabolic state gradient boost classification model (top 10 variables). b. Variable importance (based on gain contribution) for the metabolic state gradient boost classification model (top 10 variables).
Fig. 6Associations of external time-resolved variables with brain metabolic states. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 7a. Predicted vs. actual TIL using ketometabolic pathway molecules as input data for PLS regression with leave-one-out validation (Study 1). b. Predicted vs. actual GOS (6 m) using ketometabolic pathway molecules as input data for neural net with leave-one-out validation. c. Predicted vs. actual TIL using ketometabolic pathway molecules as input data for hybrid PLS regression with leave-one-out validation for Study 1 (blue) and Study 2 (red).
Fig. 5Temporal distribution of identified metabolic states (blue = “A”, red = ”B”) across external patient trajectories.
Fig. 8Schematic working hypothesis to alter brain metabolic states in TBI patients using nutritional intervention.