Literature DB >> 3120210

Osteoporosis: radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures.

B N Weissman1.   

Abstract

A number of radiographic and nuclear medicine techniques are available for the assessment of patients suspected of having osteoporosis or at risk for the development of osteoporosis. Spinal radiographs are insensitive indicators of osteoporosis. They can document the presence of metastatic tumors or other lesions that may produce compression fracture. The Singh index assesses the trabecular pattern of the proximal femur. As bone loss occurs, the trabeculae disappear in a definite sequence. Radiogrammetry refers to the measurement of bone and cortical widths in the peripheral skeleton, usually the second metacarpal. The method is low cost and most useful for population studies. It does not reflect early osteoporosis. Photodensitometry entails radiography of a part of a bone with inclusion of a standard reference wedge on the radiograph. The density of the bone is compared with the wedge. In some laboratories, precision is good (1.5 percent) and the radiation dose is low. Peripheral cortical bone is measured primarily, which is a disadvantage. Single photon absorptiometry uses the transmission of 27.5 keV photons emitted from an iodine-125 source to assess bone density. In most instances, measurements of the radial shaft are made, which reflect primarily cortical bone rather than the more reactive trabecular bone. The distal end of the radius and the calcaneus may also be measured; these areas contain primarily trabecular bone. Radiation dose is low (less than 10 mrad), but when cortical bone is evaluated, the results correlate poorly with spinal bone mineral. Thus, the test is an insensitive indicator of spinal osteoporosis. Dual energy photon absorptiometry uses a gadolinium-153 isotope source to emit photons of two different energies. The spine, hip, or total bone mineral can be evaluated. The radiation dose is low(<20 mrem). Although the axial skeleton can be assessed, the scan reflects the density of both the cortical and the trabecular bone and any adjacent calcification.Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) uses a reference phantom that is scanned adjacent to the patient to correct for scanner variations. The study allows the trabecular bone of the spine to be evaluated separately from the cortical bone. Precision is 1-3 percent. Accuracy is decreased by the presence (in older individuals) of vertebral marrow fat that makes the measured values of bone mineral spuriously low.CT scanning, using two X-ray energies, can improve accuracy, but decreases precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3120210      PMCID: PMC1478009     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  12 in total

1.  Bone measurement in the differential diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Authors:  S M Garn; A K Poznanski; J M Nagy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Femoral trabecular pattern index for evaluation of spinal osteoporosis. A detailed methodologic description.

Authors:  M Singh; B L Riggs; J W Beabout; J Jowsey
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Spinal mineral loss in oophorectomized women. Determination by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; B Ettinger; G S Gordan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1980-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; M Towsley; R Lindsay; L Markhard; D Dempster
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  From the NIH. Looking at menopause's role in osteoporosis.

Authors:  L K Doepel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-11-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prediction of postmenopausal fracture risk with use of bone mineral measurements.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; L K Heilbrun; J M Vogel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Assessment of metabolic bone diseases by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  M L Richardson; H K Genant; C E Cann; B Ettinger; G S Gordan; F O Kolb; U J Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Clinical, biochemical, radiographic, epidemiologic, and economic features of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C C Johnston; S Epstein
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine, I. Theory and application of a new two-dimensional dual-photon attenuation method.

Authors:  B Krølner; S Pors Nielsen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.713

View more
  3 in total

1.  Osteoporosis and Bone Density Studies: Does treatment help decrease mineral loss?

Authors:  L Ehrlich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Method for cortical bone structural analysis from magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Bryon R Gomberg; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  An absence of structural changes in the proximal femur with osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Saitoh; Y Nakatsuchi; L Latta; E Milne
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.