| Literature DB >> 31201170 |
Armin Rashidi1, Mehdi Hamadani2, Mei-Jie Zhang2,3, Hai-Lin Wang2, Hisham Abdel-Azim4, Mahmoud Aljurf5, Amer Assal6, Ashish Bajel7, Asad Bashey8, Minoo Battiwalla9, Amer M Beitinjaneh10, Nelli Bejanyan11, Vijaya Raj Bhatt12, Javier Bolaños-Meade13, Michael Byrne14, Jean-Yves Cahn15, Mitchell Cairo16, Stefan Ciurea17, Edward Copelan18, Corey Cutler19, Andrew Daly20, Miguel-Angel Diaz21, Nosha Farhadfar22, Robert P Gale23, Siddhartha Ganguly24, Michael R Grunwald18, Theresa Hahn25, Shahrukh Hashmi5,26, Gerhard C Hildebrandt27, H Kent Holland8, Nasheed Hossain28, Christopher G Kanakry29, Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja30, Nandita Khera31, Yener Koc32, Hillard M Lazarus33, Jong-Wook Lee34, Johan Maertens35, Rodrigo Martino36, Joseph McGuirk24, Reinhold Munker37, Hemant S Murthy22, Ryotaro Nakamura38, Sunita Nathan39, Taiga Nishihori40, Neil Palmisiano41, Sagar Patel42, Joseph Pidala43, Rebecca Olin44, Richard F Olsson45,46, Betul Oran47, Olov Ringden48, David Rizzieri49, Jacob Rowe50, Mary Lynn Savoie20, Kirk R Schultz51, Sachiko Seo52, Brian C Shaffer53, Anurag Singh24, Melhem Solh8, Keith Stockerl-Goldstein54, Leo F Verdonck55, John Wagner41, Edmund K Waller56, Marcos De Lima57, Brenda M Sandmaier58, Mark Litzow59, Dan Weisdorf60, Rizwan Romee19, Wael Saber2.
Abstract
HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has improved donor availability. However, a matched sibling donor (MSD) is still considered the optimal donor. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT vs MSD in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Data from 1205 adult CR1 AML patients (2008-2015) were analyzed. A total of 336 patients underwent PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT and 869 underwent MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The Haplo-HCT group included more reduced-intensity conditioning (65% vs 30%) and bone marrow grafts (62% vs 7%), consistent with current practice. In multivariable analysis, Haplo-HCT and MSD groups were not different with regard to overall survival (P = .15), leukemia-free survival (P = .50), nonrelapse mortality (P = .16), relapse (P = .90), or grade II-IV acute GVHD (P = .98). However, the Haplo-HCT group had a significantly lower rate of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.48; P < .001). Results of subgroup analyses by conditioning intensity and graft source suggested that the reduced incidence of chronic GVHD in Haplo-HCT is not limited to a specific graft source or conditioning intensity. Center effect and minimal residual disease-donor type interaction were not predictors of outcome. Our results indicate a lower rate of chronic GVHD after PT-Cy-based Haplo-HCT vs MSD using calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis, but similar other outcomes, in patients with AML in CR1. Haplo-HCT is a viable alternative to MSD in these patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31201170 PMCID: PMC6595262 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529