Literature DB >> 25498218

Immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy in patients with pT3-pT4 or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (EORTC 30994): an intergroup, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Cora N Sternberg1, Iwona Skoneczna2, J Martijn Kerst3, Peter Albers4, Sophie D Fossa5, Mads Agerbaek6, Herlinde Dumez7, Maria de Santis8, Christine Théodore9, Michael G Leahy10, John D Chester11, Antony Verbaeys12, Gedske Daugaard13, Lori Wood14, J Alfred Witjes15, Ronald de Wit16, Lionel Geoffrois17, Lisa Sengelov18, George Thalmann19, Danielle Charpentier20, Frédéric Rolland21, Laurent Mignot22, Santhanam Sundar23, Paul Symonds24, John Graham25, Florence Joly26, Sandrine Marreaud27, Laurence Collette27, Richard Sylvester27.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder have poor survival after cystectomy. The EORTC 30994 trial aimed to compare immediate versus deferred cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy after radical cystectomy in patients with pT3-pT4 or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
METHODS: This intergroup, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial recruited patients from hospitals across Europe and Canada. Eligible patients had histologically proven urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, pT3-pT4 disease or node positive (pN1-3) M0 disease after radical cystectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy, with no evidence of any microscopic residual disease. Within 90 days of cystectomy, patients were centrally randomly assigned (1:1) by minimisation to either immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (four cycles of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin [high-dose MVAC], or MVAC) or six cycles of deferred chemotherapy at relapse, with stratification for institution, pT category, and lymph node status according to the number of nodes dissected. Neither patients nor investigators were masked. Overall survival was the primary endpoint; all analyses were by intention to treat. The trial was closed after recruitment of 284 of the planned 660 patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00028756.
FINDINGS: From April 29, 2002, to Aug 14, 2008, 284 patients were randomly assigned (141 to immediate treatment and 143 to deferred treatment), and followed up until the data cutoff of Aug 21, 2013. After a median follow-up of 7.0 years (IQR 5.2-8.7), 66 (47%) of 141 patients in the immediate treatment group had died compared with 82 (57%) of 143 in the deferred treatment group. No significant improvement in overall survival was noted with immediate treatment when compared with deferred treatment (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08; p=0.13). Immediate treatment significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with deferred treatment (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.4-0.73, p<0.0001), with 5-year progression-free survival of 47.6% (95% CI 38.8-55.9) in the immediate treatment group and 31.8% (24.2-39.6) in the deferred treatment group. Grade 3-4 myelosuppression was reported in 33 (26%) of 128 patients who received treatment in the immediate chemotherapy group versus 24 (35%) of 68 patients who received treatment in the deferred chemotherapy group, neutropenia occurred in 49 (38%) versus 36 (53%) patients, respectively, and thrombocytopenia in 36 (28%) versus 26 (38%). Two patients died due to toxicity, one in each group.
INTERPRETATION: Our data did not show a significant improvement in overall survival with immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. However, the trial is limited in power, and it is possible that some subgroups of patients might still benefit from immediate chemotherapy. An updated individual patient data meta-analysis and biomarker research are needed to further elucidate the potential for survival benefit in subgroups of patients. FUNDING: Lilly, Canadian Cancer Society Research.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498218     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71160-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  92 in total

Review 1.  Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy.

Authors:  Hayley Knollman; J Luke Godwin; Rishi Jain; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Bladder cancer in 2015: Improving indication, technique and outcome of radical cystectomy.

Authors:  J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  The emerging role of antibody-drug conjugates in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Lattanzi; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.512

4.  Propensity-matched analysis of stage-specific efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Felix V Chen; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Joshua S Jue; Mahmoud Alameddine; Devina J Dave; Sanoj Punnen; Dipen J Parekh; Chad R Ritch; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Peter C Black; Srikala S Sridhar; Anil Kapoor; Alexandre R Zlotta; Bobby Shayegan; Ricardo A Rendon; Peter Chung; Theodorus van der Kwast; Nimira Alimohamed; Yves Fradet; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Underused across the 49th parallel.

Authors:  Michael J Raphael; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  [Adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer (individual patient data)].

Authors:  D Wilborn; S Schmidt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vitaly Margulis; Maneka Puligandla; Edouard J Trabulsi; Elizabeth R Plimack; Elizabeth R Kessler; Surena F Matin; Guilherme Godoy; Ajjai Alva; Noah M Hahn; Michael A Carducci; Jean Hoffman-Censits
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Precision medicine for urothelial bladder cancer: update on tumour genomics and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kenneth M Felsenstein; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.