| Literature DB >> 31199857 |
Xi-Hsuan Lin1,2, Jeng-Kai Jiang3,4, Jiing-Chyuan Luo1,2, Chung-Chi Lin1,5, Po-Hsiang Ting1,2, Ueng-Cheng Yang6, Yuan-Tzu Lan3,4, Yi-Hsiang Huang1,2, Ming-Chih Hou1,2, Fa-Yauh Lee1,2.
Abstract
Whether there are subsequent changes of metabolic profiles and microbiota status after partial colectomy remains unknown. We evaluated and compared long-term effects of microbiota status and metabolic profiles in early colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after curative colectomy to the controls. In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed metabolic syndrome occurrence in 165 patients after curative partial colectomy with right hemicolectomy (RH) or low anterior resection (LAR) and 333 age-sex matched controls. Fecal samples from some of those with RH, LAR, and controls were analyzed by next-generation sequencing method. The occurrences of metabolic syndrome were significantly higher in patients after RH, but not LAR, when compared with the controls over the long term (> 5 years) follow-up (P = 0.020). Compared with control group, RH group showed lower bacterial diversity (P = 0.007), whereas LAR group showed significantly higher bacterial diversity at the genera level (P = 0.016). Compared with the control group, the principal component analysis revealed significant differences in bacterial genera abundance after RH and LAR (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio was significantly lower in the RH group than the control group (22.0% versus 49.4%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, early CRC patients after RH but not LAR were associated with a higher occurrence of metabolic syndrome than the controls during long-term follow-up. In parallel with metabolic change, patients with RH showed dysbiosis with a tendency to decreased richness and a significant decrease in the diversity of gut microbiota.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31199857 PMCID: PMC6570030 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Anthropometric and laboratory data between patients with partial colectomy and the control group with a median follow-up of 8.75 years.
| Control subjects | Patients with partial colectomy N = 165 | Patients with LAR | Patients with RH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age y/o | 71.1 ± 5.0 | 70.1 ± 10.3 | 70.0 ± 10.4 | 71.4 ± 9.8 |
| Sex (M: F) | 191: 142 | 92: 73 | 69: 43 | 23: 30 |
| body mass index | 24.5 ± 3.1 | 24.4 ± 3.2 | 24.6 ± 3.0 | 23.8 ± 3.6 |
| waist (cm) | 86.4 ± 10.8 | 87.0 ± 7.6 | 87.8 ± 7.0 | 86.0 ± 8.8 |
| systolic BP (mm Hg) | 126 ± 18 | 130 ± 14 | 130 ± 13 | 131 ± 16 |
| diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 75 ± 11 | 76 ± 12 | 77 ± 14 | 76 ± 10 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 51 ± 13 | 51 ± 12 | 48 ± 10 | 55 ± 13 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 190 ± 38 | 185 ± 32 | 184 ± 31 | 187 ± 34 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 120 ± 60 | 118 ± 58 | 115 ± 53 | 123 ± 68 |
| Serum glucose (mg/dL) | 100 ± 22 | 107 ± 22 | 105 ± 20 | 110 ± 24 |
| Metabolic syndrome + (%) | 104 (31.2%) | 80 (48.5%) | 50 (44%) | 30 (56.6%) |
GI, gastrointestinal; BP, blood pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LAR, low anterior resection; RH, right hemicolectomy.
* P<0.05 when compared with the control group.
Anthropometric and laboratory data between patients with partial colectomy (right hemicolectomy or low anterior resection) and controls with fecal microbiome.
| Control subjects | Patients with LAR | Patients with RH N = 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age y/o | 73.1 ± 7.0 | 72.7 ± 7.0 | 74.4 ± 9.8 |
| Sex (M: F) | 12: 8 | 6: 4 | 6: 4 |
| body mass index | 23.1 ± 3.5 | 24.6 ± 3.0 | 23.5 ± 3.4 |
| waist (cm) | 85.4 ± 11.2 | 86.6 ± 7.0 | 88.9 ± 9.2 |
| systolic BP (mm Hg) | 125 ± 15 | 130 ± 16 | 129 ± 22 |
| diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 77 ± 10 | 80 ± 11 | 75 ± 9 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 58 ± 11 | 56 ± 10 | 50 ± 15 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 199 ± 31 | 185 ± 36 | 186 ± 24 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 108 ± 42 | 108 ± 40 | 109 ± 43 |
| Serum glucose (mg/dL) | 95 ± 18 | 95 ± 15 | 106 ± 12 |
| Metabolic syndrome + (%) | 7 (35%) | 4 (40%) | 6 (60%) |
GI, gastrointestinal; BP, blood pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LAR, low anterior resection; RH, right hemicolectomy.
There were no significant difference between t groups
Fig 1Richness and diversity of gut microbiota between patients with partial colectomy (right hemicolectomy or low anterior resection) and controls.
Chao1 estimated no significant difference among RH, LAR, and control group though a tendency to decrease in bacterial richness in RH group when compared with others (Fig 1A). LAR group showed higher bacterial diversity, as estimated by the fisher's alpha diversity index and Shannon diversity index, when compared with control group (p < 0.05, Fig 1B & 1C). RH group showed lower bacterial diversity, as estimated by the Shannon diversity index when compared with control group (p < 0.05, Fig 1C). The boxes (containing 50% of all values) show the median (horizontal line across the middle of the box) and the interquartile range, whereas the black spots represent the 10th and the 90th percentiles.
Fig 2Principal component analysis of bacterial genera abundance.
Gut microbial genera composition using a principal component analysis (PCA) of the log-transformed relative abundances showed a clear separation between control group, and those after right hemicolectomy (RH) or low anterior resection (LAR). Compared with control group, RH group and LAR group revealed significant differences in bacterial genera abundance respectively (p all < 0.001, Monte-Carlo simulation).
Fig 3Relative abundances of classes across three groups.
Relative abundances of phylum across right hemicolectomy (RH), low anterior resection (LAR), and control groups (Fig 3A). Relative abundances of classes across right hemicolectomy (RH), low anterior resection (LAR), and control groups (Fig 3B).
Fig 4Known genera abundance reported by LEfSe in the bacterial community.
Known genera reported by LEfSe in the bacterial community, comparison between right hemicolectomy (RH) and control group (Fig 4A). Known genera reported by LEfSe in the bacterial community, comparison between low anterior resection (LAR) and control (Fig 4B).