| Literature DB >> 31199833 |
Niek J Pluijmert1, Melina C den Haan1, Vanessa L van Zuylen1, Paul Steendijk1, Hetty C de Boer2, Anton J van Zonneveld2, Willem E Fibbe3, Martin J Schalij1, Paul H A Quax4,5, Douwe E Atsma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease including acute myocardial infarction. However, long-term effects of hypercholesterolemia in a rodent myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury model are unknown. Therefore, the effects of diet-induced hypercholesterolemia on cardiac function and remodeling were investigated up to eight weeks after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI-R) injury which was induced in either normocholesterolemic (NC-MI) or hypercholesterolemic (HC-MI) APOE*3-Leiden mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31199833 PMCID: PMC6570022 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Lipid profiles.
Plasma (A) total cholesterol and (B) triglycerides levels in the NC-MI (open bars) and HC-MI (closed bars) group. Data are means ± SEM. ***P<0.001 vs. NC-MI group.
Animal characteristics.
Body weight (BW), heart weight (HW). Values are means ± SEM. **P<0.01 vs. NC-MI.
| Normal | Cholesterol | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| T (wk) | NC-MI | HC-MI | |
| N | 16 | 18 | |
| 0 | 86 ± 3 | 88 ± 2 | |
| 0 | 20.9 ± 0.3 | 20.5 ± 0.4 | |
| 8 | 22.4 ± 0.4 | 22.9 ± 0.4 | |
| 7.3 ± 1.3 | 12.1 ± 1.1** | ||
| 8 | 191 ± 16 | 176 ± 5 | |
| 8.2 ± 0.6 | 7.5 ± 0.2 | ||
| 208 ± 11 | 205 ± 11 |
Fig 2Serial echocardiography.
(A) End-diastolic volume, (B) end-systolic volume, (C) ejection fraction, and (D) cardiac output in NC-MI (open bars) and HC-MI (closed bars) groups at baseline, 1, 3, and 8 weeks after MI-R (n = 16–18). Data are means ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 all vs. week 0.
Pressure-volume loops-derived LV function indices.
| NC-MI | HC-MI | |
|---|---|---|
| 551 ± 18 | 531 ± 20 | |
| 13.5 ± 2.5 | 11.4 ± 1.0 | |
| 29 ± 5 | 28 ± 5 | |
| 53 ± 7 | 49 ± 6 | |
| 89 ± 2 | 73 ± 3 | |
| 4.4 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 0.8 | |
| 8.3 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 0.4 | |
| 6.8 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.4 | |
| 9.8 ± 0.3 | 11.1 ± 0.8 | |
| 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | |
| 4.8 ± 1.1 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | |
| 164 ± 5 | 131 ± 5 | |
| 3.8 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | |
| 26.3 ± 4.9 | 29.9 ± 5.1 | |
| 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.05 | |
| 61.1 ± 10.9 | 46.7 ± 4.0 |
CO, cardiac output; dP/dtMAX, maximum rate of pressure increase; -dP/dtMIN, maximum rate of pressure decrease; EA, effective arterial elastance; EDP, end-diastolic pressure; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EDVint, end-diastolic intercept volume; EED, end-diastolic stiffness; EES, end-systolic elastance; ESP, end-systolic pressure; ESPiso, end-systolic peak isovolumic pressure; ESPVR, end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; ESV, end-systolic volume; ESVint, end-systolic intercept volume; HR, heart rate; SW, stroke work; Tau, relaxation time constant. Values are means ± SEM.
**P<0.01
***P<0.001 vs. NC-MI.
Fig 3Pressure-volume loops.
PV loops 8 weeks after MI-R of the NC-MI and HC-MI groups. The oblique lines represent the end-systolic (EES) and end-diastolic (EED) pressure-volume relations.
Fig 4Infarct size, LV wall thickness, and vascular profile 8 weeks after MI-R.
Infarct size (n = 8) was significantly smaller in the HC-MI group compared with the NC-MI group (A). Wall thickness of the infarct area was significantly larger in the HC-MI group (B). Sirius red staining in the HC-MI group showed a more pronounced subendocardial and epicardial border of surviving cardiomyocytes in the HC-MI group (D) compared to the NC-MI group (C). Vascular analysis showed no differences in number of small capillaries (<20μm) or large vessels (>20μm) in the border zone (BZ) or infarct area (MI) between both groups (E). Data are means ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Fig 5Inflammatory response as a result of the cholesterol-enriched diet and MI-R.
Quantification of monocytes as a percentage of total leukocytes (A) and activated (Ly-6Chi) monocytes as a percentage of total monocytes (B) in whole blood 1 week before induction of MI-R (n = 11–15) and 3 weeks after MI-R (n = 6–7). **P<0.01 vs. time-corresponding NC-MI group. Quantification of leukocytes (C) and macrophages (D) 8 weeks after MI-R in the infarct area, border zone and septum, expressed as the number per area. Data are means ± SEM. *P<0.05.