Crystal M North1,2, Engi F Attia3,4, Kristina E Rudd4,5, Trishul Siddharthan6, Alfred Papali7, Başak Çoruh3, E Jane Carter8, David C Christiani1,2, Jeremy B Richards9, Laurence Huang10,11, Ruth Engelberg3, William Checkley6, T Eoin West3,4,12. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 4. International Respiratory and Severe Illness Center and. 5. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina. 8. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 9. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 10. University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California and. 11. Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda. 12. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
Rationale: Clinical and research training opportunities in global health are of increasing interest to medical trainees, but little is known about such opportunities in U.S.-based pulmonary and pulmonary/critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs. Objectives: Summarize currently available global health-related training opportunities and identify potential barriers to implementing global health curricula among U.S.-based PCCM fellowship programs. Methods: We sent a confidential, online, targeted needs assessment to PCCM fellowship program directors and associate program directors. Data collected included program demographics, currently available global health-related clinical and research training opportunities, potential barriers to the implementation of global health-related programmatic content, and perceived interest in global health-related training opportunities by current and/or prospective trainees. To evaluate for nonresponse bias, we performed an online search to identify global health-related training opportunities offered by nonresponding programs. Results: Out of 171 surveyed programs, 63 PCCM fellowship programs (37%) provided survey responses. Most responses (n = 56, 89%) were from combined PCCM training programs; 66% (n = 40) of programs offered at least one component of global health-related clinical or research training. Overall, 27% (n = 17) had a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Institutional Research Training Grant (National Institutes of Health T32), 73% (n = 46) had fewer than 35 faculty members, and 51% (n = 32) had at least one faculty member conducting global health-focused research. Most responding programs (66%, n = 40) offered at least one global health-related educational component. Among programs that would like to offer global health-related training components, the most common barriers included competing priorities for lecture content and a lack of in-division mentors with global health experience, a champion for global health-related activities, and established partnerships outside the United States.Conclusions: PCCM program leaders are interested in offering global health-related training opportunities, but important barriers include lack of mentorship, dedicated fellowship time, and established global partnerships. Future research is needed to better understand global health-related interests and training needs of incoming fellows and to design creative solutions for providing global health-related training across academic institutions with variable global health-related training capacities.
Rationale: Clinical and research training opportunities in global health are of increasing interest to medical trainees, but little is known about such opportunities in U.S.-based pulmonary and pulmonary/critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship programs. Objectives: Summarize currently available global health-related training opportunities and identify potential barriers to implementing global health curricula among U.S.-based PCCM fellowship programs. Methods: We sent a confidential, online, targeted needs assessment to PCCM fellowship program directors and associate program directors. Data collected included program demographics, currently available global health-related clinical and research training opportunities, potential barriers to the implementation of global health-related programmatic content, and perceived interest in global health-related training opportunities by current and/or prospective trainees. To evaluate for nonresponse bias, we performed an online search to identify global health-related training opportunities offered by nonresponding programs. Results: Out of 171 surveyed programs, 63 PCCM fellowship programs (37%) provided survey responses. Most responses (n = 56, 89%) were from combined PCCM training programs; 66% (n = 40) of programs offered at least one component of global health-related clinical or research training. Overall, 27% (n = 17) had a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Institutional Research Training Grant (National Institutes of Health T32), 73% (n = 46) had fewer than 35 faculty members, and 51% (n = 32) had at least one faculty member conducting global health-focused research. Most responding programs (66%, n = 40) offered at least one global health-related educational component. Among programs that would like to offer global health-related training components, the most common barriers included competing priorities for lecture content and a lack of in-division mentors with global health experience, a champion for global health-related activities, and established partnerships outside the United States.Conclusions: PCCM program leaders are interested in offering global health-related training opportunities, but important barriers include lack of mentorship, dedicated fellowship time, and established global partnerships. Future research is needed to better understand global health-related interests and training needs of incoming fellows and to design creative solutions for providing global health-related training across academic institutions with variable global health-related training capacities.
Keywords:
curriculum; global health; medical education; needs assessment
Authors: Jeffrey P Koplan; T Christopher Bond; Michael H Merson; K Srinath Reddy; Mario Henry Rodriguez; Nelson K Sewankambo; Judith N Wasserheit Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elizabeth Ablah; Dorothy A Biberman; Elizabeth M Weist; Pierre Buekens; Margaret E Bentley; Donald Burke; John R Finnegan; Antoine Flahault; Julio Frenk; Audrey R Gotsch; Michael J Klag; Mario Henry Rodriguez Lopez; Philip Nasca; Stephen Shortell; Harrison C Spencer Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Trishul Siddharthan; Crystal M North; Engi F Attia; David C Christiani; William Checkley; T Eoin West Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-06
Authors: S N Kiwanuka; E K Ekirapa; S Peterson; O Okui; M Hafizur Rahman; D Peters; G W Pariyo Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Alfred Papali; Janet V Diaz; E Jane Carter; Juliana C Ferreira; Rob Fowler; Tewodros H Gebremariam; Stephen B Gordon; Burton W Lee; Srinivas Murthy; Elisabeth D Riviello; T Eoin West; Neill Kj Adhikari Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.413