Literature DB >> 31196580

Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes.

Jaeryung Kim1, Sung-Ho Choi2, Dong Hui Lim3, Chan Min Yang1, Gil-Joong Yoon4, Tae-Young Chung5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of topography-guided and wavefront-optimized surgery in patients having laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.
SETTING: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, and BALGEUN-EYE21 Operation Center, Gwangju, South Korea.
DESIGN: Prospective case study.
METHODS: Patients had topography-guided LASIK in 1 eye and wavefront-optimized LASIK in the contralateral eye using Contoura Vision software and the WaveLight EX500 excimer laser. Refractive and visual outcomes were analyzed 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The study comprised 43 patients. In both groups, the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or better in 90.7% of eyes and the residual spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error was ±0.75 diopter (D) in 81.4% of eyes. The UDVA, residual SE refractive error, and astigmatism did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There was significant induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in both groups, although corneal coma and trefoil did not increase and ocular trefoil decreased significantly in the topography-guided group (P = .038). However, in the wavefront-optimized group, corneal coma and trefoil increased significantly (P < .001 and P = .046, respectively) and ocular trefoil did not change significantly. In addition, topography-guided LASIK induced significantly fewer corneal total HOAs (P < .001), coma (P < .001), and trefoil (P = .020) than wavefront-optimized LASIK.
CONCLUSION: Although both topography-guided LASIK and wavefront-optimized LASIK safely and effectively achieved the predicted refractive and visual outcomes, topography-guided LASIK induced fewer HOAs and significantly decreased ocular trefoil, corneal total HOAs, and coma.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31196580     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Vector analysis of Contoura Vision for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Ying Lin; Huan-Jun Su; Mu-Zhi Yuan; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Changes in asphericity of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces for mild-moderate and high myopia after topography-guided FS-LASIK.

Authors:  Yuan Wu; Shengshu Sun; Zhanglin Liu; Shuhan Wang; Guiqin Wang; Shaozhen Zhao; Ruihua Wei; Yue Huang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.029

3.  Mutual comparative analysis: a new topography-guided custom ablation protocol referencing subjective refraction to modify corneal topographic data.

Authors:  Kaiwei Cao; Lina Liu; Tao Zhang; Ting Liu; Ji Bai
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-07

4.  Topography-Guided Refractive Astigmatism Outcomes: Predictions Comparing Three Different Programming Methods.

Authors:  R Doyle Stulting; Daniel S Durrie; Richard J Potvin; Steve H Linn; Ronald R Krueger; Mark C Lobanoff; Majid Moshirfar; Manoj V Motwani; Timothy P Lindquist; Karl G Stonecipher
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 5.  Topography-guided treatment in regular and irregular corneas.

Authors:  Shreyas Ramamurthy; B Soundarya; Gitansha S Sachdev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study.

Authors:  Ermano M Alves; Adriana F Lyra; Manuela Tenório; Natália Mesquita; Carolina Bacelar; Afra Montenegro; Lucas Alves; Márcio Alves
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK.

Authors:  Jaeryung Kim; Sung-Ho Choi; Dong Hui Lim; Gil-Joong Yoon; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.