| Literature DB >> 31195964 |
Bijay K Khajanchi1, Joshua Xu2, Christopher J Grim3, Andrea R Ottesen4, Padmini Ramachandran4, Steven L Foley5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Salmonella enterica possess several iron acquisition systems, encoded on the chromosome and plasmids. Recently, we demonstrated that incompatibility group (Inc) FIB plasmid-encoded iron acquisition systems (Sit and aerobactin) likely play an important role in persistence of Salmonella in human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2). In this study, we sought to determine global transcriptome analyses of S. enterica in iron-rich (IR) and iron-depleted (ID) growth conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Iron acquisition systems; Iron-depleted growth conditions; Iron-rich growth conditions; Salmonella; Transcriptomic analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31195964 PMCID: PMC6567447 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5768-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Global transcriptomic analyses of S. enterica by RNA-Seq. Total of 12 RNA sample libraries, two biological replicates for each strain in two different conditions (ID versus IR) were included in the RNA-Seq experiment. Sequence reads were mapped to genome sequences of S. Typhimuirum LT2 and the WT SE163A. Transcripts per million (TPM) was calculated for individual genes. TPM of each gene was normalized with gmk and adk and fold-changes were calculated from normalized values. A cut off ≥4-fold differences of transcript abundances was used to establish the presence of differential gene expression. a) Less number of genes were differentially expressed in WT as compared to transconjugant (SE819::IncFIB) and recipient (SE819) strains in iron-depleted conditions. b) More number of genes were up-regulated in ID as compared to IR growth conditions in transconjugant than recipient. Whereas, identical number of genes were downregulated in these two strains in IR and ID growth conditions
Selected genes that were upregulated in transconjugant SE819::IncFIB in iron-depleted as compare to iron-rich conditions in RNA-Seq
Selected genes that were downregulated in transconjugant SE819::IncFIB in iron-depleted as compare to iron-rich conditions in RNA-Seq
Selected genes that were upregulated in WT SE163A in iron-depleted conditions as compare to iron-rich in RNA-Seq
Selected genes that were downregulated in WT SE163A in iron-depleted as compare to iron-rich conditions in RNA-Seq
Fig. 2Validation of RNA-Seq data by qRT-PCR. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) using SYBR green assays was performed to validate gene expression levels obtained by RNA-Seq. Four genes [entS, fepC, enolase, colicin transporter (colicin-T)] were selected to validate the RNA-Seq results of WT, transconjugant and recipient. Two biological replicates and three technical replicates were used for each sample of two different conditions (ID and IR). Gene expression was normalized by gmk and adk reference genes. In the figure, each bar indicates the increased fold changes of that gene corresponding to the same strain in ID as compared to IR conditions. For example, in WT (SE163A) entS transcript was increased approximately 70-fold in ID as compared to IR. Error bars indicate standard error of mean (SEM) of gene expression of two biological replicates for each strain
Fig. 3Protein bands were separated on SDS-PAGE gel for proteome analysis. Proteome analyses of WT, transconjugant and recipient were performed after grown in IR and ID conditions using SDS-PAGE and selected protein bands were identified by LC-MS/MS analyses as indicated in the figures (Bands positions 1 to 4). SDS-PAGE analyses showed that Band #1 was increasingly expressed in TC and WT as compared to recipient. Whereas, Band #2 was increasingly expressed in TC and recipient as compared to WT. Band #3 was only expressed in WT not in TC and recipient. Band # 4 was increasingly expressed in WT, TC and recipient in IR as compared to ID conditions. M = protein ladder; R = recipient; TC = transconjugant; WT = wild type
Selected protein bands of WT, transconjugant and recipient of Salmonella enterica were identified by LC-MS/MS