| Literature DB >> 31194013 |
Wesam A Mokhtar1, Amal Fawzy2, Reem M Allam3, Rania M Amer4, Mona S Hamed5.
Abstract
Vitamin D & vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling play a very crucial role in early embryonic heart development. We construct this case-control study to investigate the association between maternal serum vitamin D level & VDR gene Fok1 polymorphism and risk of congenital heart defects (CHD) in offspring. Fifty mothers who had term neonates with CHD were considered as cases. Fifty age-comparable healthy mothers who had neonates without CHD were contemplated as controls. Maternal serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] level was tested using ELISA. Maternal VDR gene Fok1 polymorphism was analyzed using PCR-based RFLP-assay. There was a significant decrease in maternal vitamin D level (P = 0.002) and a significant increase in vitamin D deficient status (P = 0.007) among cases when compared to controls. VDR gene Fok1 genotypes distribution frequency were in accordance with Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HW) among controls. A significant increase in VDR gene Fok1 F/f & f/f genotypes and f allele were observed in cases compared to controls with estimated odds ratio (95% confidence interval) & P-value of 3 (1-8) & P = 0.006, 11 (1-97) & P = 0.01 and 3 (2-6) & P = 0.001 respectively. There was a significant decrease in maternal vitamin D level in neonates with cyanotic CHD (P = 0.000) compared to those with a cyanotic CHD while there was no significant difference in VDR Fok1 genotype (P = 0.18) & allele (P = 0.05) distribution between two groups. We concluded that maternal vitamin D deficiency and VDR gene Fok1 F/f, f/f genotype and f allele were associated with increased risk of CHD in offspring.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital heart disease; FoK1 polymorphism; Maternal vitamin D; Vitamin D; Vitamin D receptor gene
Year: 2018 PMID: 31194013 PMCID: PMC6545446 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Dis ISSN: 2352-3042
General Characteristics of studied groups.
| Characteristics | Cases (n = 50) | Controls (n = 50) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal general characterization | |||
| Maternal Age; in yearsa | |||
| Median (IQR) | 28 (20–35) | 28 (20–35) | 0.85 |
| Min-Max | 17–38 | 19–37 | |
| Residency; n (%)b | |||
| Urban | 7 (14) | 13 (26) | 0.13 |
| Rural | 43 (86) | 37 (74) | |
| Educational level; n (%)c | |||
| High | 3 (6) | 6 (12) | 0.53 |
| Intermediate | 19 (38) | 20 (40) | |
| Low | 28 (56) | 24 (48) | |
| Previous abortion; n (%)b | |||
| Positive history | 15 (30) | 4 (8) | 0.009∗ |
| Negative history | 35 (70) | 46 (92) | |
| Previous CHD in sibilings; n (%)c | |||
| Positive history | 10 (20) | 2 (4) | 0.02∗ |
| Negative history | 40 (80) | 48 (96) | |
| Maternal vitamin D intake; n (%)c | |||
| Non-user | 24 (48) | 13 (26) | 0.15 |
| Peri-conceptional users | 3 (6) | 6 (12) | |
| Early post-conceptional users | 6 (12) | 9 (18) | |
| Late post-conceptional users | 17 (34) | 22 (44) | |
| Neonatal general characterization | |||
| Gestational Age; in Weeksa | |||
| Median (IQR) | 38 (37–40) | 38 (37–40) | 0.14 |
| Min-Max | 37–40 | 37–40 | |
| Birth Weight; Kga | |||
| Median (IQR) | 3 (2–4) | 3 (3–4) | 0.81 |
| Min-Max | 2.3–4 | 2.5–4 | |
| Sex; n (%)b | |||
| Male | 29 (48) | 24 (48) | 0.31 |
| Female | 21 (42) | 26 (52) | |
| Mode of delivery; n (%)b | |||
| C.S | 24 (48) | 27 (54) | 0.54 |
| NVD | 26 (52) | 23 (46) | |
Statistical analysis: a, Mann Whitney test; b, Chi Square test; c, Fisher's exact test.
*Significance at P ≤ 0.05.
C.S, caesarian section; CHD, congenital heart diseases; NVD, normal vaginal delivery; IQR, inter-quartile range.
Serum vitamin D level and vitamin D status among cases and controls.
| Cases (n = 50) | Control (n = 50) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal vitamin D level; nmol/La | |||
| Median (IQR) | 26 (10–8) | 37 (16–76) | 0.002∗ |
| Min-Max | 6.5–78 | 13–80 | |
| Maternal vitamin D status; n (%)b | |||
| Deficient | 24 (48) | 8 (16) | 0.006∗ |
| Insufficient | 17 (34) | 25 (50) | |
| Inadequate | 6 (12) | 11 (22) | |
| Sufficient | 3 (6) | 6 (12) | |
Statistical analysis: a, Mann Whitney test; b, Fisher's exact test.
∗Significance at P ≤ 0.05.
VDR gene Fok1 polymorphism genotype and allele distribution among cases and controls.
| Cases (n = 50) | Controls (n = 50) | P-value | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F/F | 20 (40) | 36 (72) | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| F/fa | 24 (48) | 13 (26) | 3 | 1–8 | |
| f/fb | 6 (12) | 1 (2) | 10 | 1–97 | |
| F | 64 (64) | 85 (85) | 3 | 2–6 | |
| f | 36 (36) | 15 (15) | |||
Statistical analysis: a; chi square test, b; fisher's exact test.
*Significant at P ≤ 0.05.
95%CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; VDR, vitamin D receptor.
Maternal vitamin D level & status in relation to VDR gene Fok1 polymorphism among cases.
| Fok1 genotype | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F/F (n = 20) | F/f (n = 24) | f/f (n = 6) | P-value | |
| Median (IQR) | 31 (20–78) | 21 (12–41) | 11 (7–17) | 0.000∗ |
| Min-Max | 10–78 | 10–52 | 6.5–17 | |
| Deficient (n = 24) | 2 (8.3) | 16 (66.7) | 6 (25) | 0.000∗ |
| Insufficient (n = 17) | 9 (52.9) | 8 (47.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Inadequate (n = 6) | 6 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Sufficient (n = 3) | 3 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Statistical analysis: a, Kruskal–Wallis test; b, fisher's exact test.
*Significance at P ≤ 0.05.
Types of structural CHDs among neonatal cases.
| CHDs | n = 50 | % |
|---|---|---|
| VSD | 14 | 28 |
| ASD | 11 | 22 |
| PDA | 9 | 18 |
| A-V defect | 3 | 6 |
| TGA | 5 | 10 |
| TOF | 3 | 6 |
| Truncus arteriosus | 2 | 4 |
| Hypoplastic left heart syndrome | 2 | 4 |
| DORV | 1 | 2 |
A-V defect, Atrio-ventricular defect; ASD, Atrial septal defect; CDH, congenital heart defects; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; VSD, ventricular septal defect; PDA, Patent ductus arteriosus; TGA, Transposition of great vessels; TOF, Tetralogy of fallout.
Maternal vitamin D level and Fok1 genotype distribution between A cyanotic and Cyanotic CHD.
| A cyanotic CHD n = 37 | Cyanotic CHD n = 13 | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | 31 (15–65) | 14 (8–28) | ||
| Min-Max | 10–78 | 6.5–30 | ||
| Deficient n = 24 | 12 (50) | 12 (50) | ||
| Insufficient n = 17 | 15 (88.2) | 2 (11.8) | ||
| Inadequate n = 6 | 6 (100) | 0 (0) | ||
| Sufficient n = 3 | 3 (100) | 0 (0) | ||
| F/F | n = 20 | 12 (60) | 8 (40) | |
| F/f | n = 24 | 20 (83.3) | 4 (16.7) | |
| f/f | n = 6 | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | |
| F | n = 64 | 44 (68.7) | 20 (31.3) | |
| f | n = 42 | 36 (85.7) | 6 (14.3) | |
Statistical analysis: a, Mann–Whitney test; b, Fisher's exact test; c, chi square test.
CHD, congenital heart defects; IQR, interquartile rang.
*Significance at P ≤ 0.05.