Literature DB >> 31193916

Dosimetric comparison of conformal technique (3D) with volumetric modulated arc therapy with respect to doses obtained in the temporal lobe area in patients irradiated for brain meningioma.

Łukasz Trembecki1, Tomasz Siudziński2, Aleksandra Sztuder1, Adam Maciejczyk1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the analysis was to compare doses obtained for temporal lobes in patients being irradiated for meningiomas of the brain using the conformal technique and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). We try to answer the question whether the application of VMAT would lead to higher doses within temporal lobes.
BACKGROUND: In recent years a significant increase in the detection of meningiomas and effectiveness of treatment has been observed. Hence quality of life should be considered as an important aspect after a treatment course.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment plans of 27 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Radiotherapy procedures were carried out from 2007 until 2016 at the Department of Radiation Oncology in Wroclaw, Poland. For individual patients, alternative treatment plans were generated in relation to the ones originally used, wherein from dynamic techniques, volumetric modulated arc therapy was selected for analysis. Evaluated dosimetric parameters for temporal lobes were: mean dose, V10 Gy, V20 Gy, V45 Gy.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed for V45 Gy for both temporal lobes (p = 0.023) and for V45 Gy for the right (p = 0.001) and the left temporal lobe (p = 0.016) considered for VMAT. The mean values of the V45 Gy for both temporal lobes, for the right temporal lobe and for the left temporal lobe were lower for VMAT than for 3D, respectively: 7.54% and 7.90%, 6.82% and 9.47%, 5.67% and 7.14%.Analysis of the remaining results found no statistical differences.
CONCLUSION: Application of VMAT in patients treated for meningioma of the brain is not related to higher doses of radiation in the temporal lobe area, compared with the conformal technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meningioma; Temporal lobe; Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31193916      PMCID: PMC6545355          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for frontal and temporal high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Richard Shaffer; Alan M Nichol; Emily Vollans; Ming Fong; Sandy Nakano; Vitali Moiseenko; Moira Schmuland; Roy Ma; Michael McKenzie; Karl Otto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and post-operative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Melanie T M Davidson; Samuel J Blake; Deidre L Batchelar; Patrick Cheung; Katherine Mah
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Feasibility of reducing the irradiation dose in regions of active neurogenesis for prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R Tarnawski; L Michalecki; S Blamek; L Hawrylewicz; T Piotrowski; K Slosarek; R Kulik; B Bobek-Billewicz
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.575

4.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for complex-shaped meningioma of the skull base: long-term experience of a single institution.

Authors:  Stefanie Milker-Zabel; Angelika Zabel-du Bois; Peter Huber; Wolfgang Schlegel; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Treatment and dosimetric advantages between VMAT, IMRT, and helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chiao-Ling Tsai; Jian-Kuen Wu; Hsiao-Ling Chao; Yi-Chun Tsai; Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.482

6.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy improves dosimetry and reduces treatment time compared to conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer and internal mammary nodes.

Authors:  Carmen C Popescu; Ivo A Olivotto; Wayne A Beckham; Will Ansbacher; Sergei Zavgorodni; Richard Shaffer; Elaine S Wai; Karl Otto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Radiotherapy of malignant gliomas: comparison of volumetric single arc technique (RapidArc), dynamic intensity-modulated technique and 3D conformal technique.

Authors:  Daniela Wagner; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik Wolff; Hilke Vorwerk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Radiotherapy after surgery for benign cerebral meningioma.

Authors:  Serdar Soyuer; Eric L Chang; Ugur Selek; Weiming Shi; Moshe H Maor; Franco DeMonte
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Region-specific radiotherapy and neuropsychological outcomes in adult survivors of childhood CNS malignancies.

Authors:  Gregory T Armstrong; Neelam Jain; Wei Liu; Thomas E Merchant; Marilyn Stovall; Deo Kumar Srivastava; James G Gurney; Roger J Packer; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 13.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.