Literature DB >> 31193597

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and Mild Diabetes Mellitus Following Treatment With Pioglitazone: Reports of a Randomised Trial From The Japan Working Group for the Assessment Whether Pioglitazone Protects DM Patients Against Re-Infarction (PPAR Study).

Masanori Asakura1,2,3, Jiyoong Kim1,4, Hiroshi Asanuma5, Yasuharu Nakama6, Kengo Tsukahara7, Yorihiko Higashino8, Tetsuya Ishikawa9, Shinji Koba10, Mitsuru Tsujimoto11, Hideo Himeno12, Yasuyuki Maruyama13, Takanori Ookusa14, Shunichi Yoda15, Hiroshi Suzuki16, Shinji Okubo17, Makoto Shimizu18, Yuji Hashimoto19, Kazuo Satake20, Susumu Fujino21, Hiroyasu Uzui22, Yoshiyuki Nagai23, Tohru Kohno24, Sumio Mizuno25, Makoto Nakahama26, Hounin Kanaya27, Toyoaki Murohara28, Kazuki Fukui29, Hiroyuki Takase30, Nobuyuki Ohte31, Takaaki Shiono32, Masatake Fukunami33, Tsutomu Endo34, Reimin Sawada35, Kenshi Fujii21, Motoshi Takeuchi36, Shuntaro Ikeda37, Koichi Mizuno38, Masaaki Uematsu39, Taku Matsubara40, Shoji Yano41, Jun Takahashi42, Kousei Ueda43, Yoshihiko Kinoshita44, Koichi Tamita45, Hideki Hayashi46, Toshimitsu Hamasaki47, Masafumi Kitakaze1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is critically important to prevent ischaemic heart failure and reduce social burden. Pioglitazone improves vascular dysfunction and prevents coronary atherosclerosis, mainly via anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic effects by enhancing adiponectin production in addition to antihyperglycemic effects, thus suggesting that pioglitazone attenuates cardiovascular events in patients with mild (HbA1c levels < 6·5%) diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, we evaluated the effects of pioglitazone on cardiovascular events in patients with both previous MI and mild DM.
METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial, we randomly assigned 630 patients with mild DM with a history of MI to undergo either DM therapy with (pioglitazone group) or without (control group) pioglitazone. DM was diagnosed using the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and mild DM was defined if HbA1c level was < 6·5%. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation caused by acute MI, unstable angina, coronary revascularisation (including percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac bypass surgery), and stroke.
FINDINGS: HbA1C levels were 5·9 and 5·8% (p = 0·71) at baseline and 6·0 and 5·8% (p < 0·01) at 2 years for the control and pioglitazone groups, respectively.The primary endpoint was observed in 14·2% and 14·1% patients in the control and pioglitazone groups during two years (95% confidential interval (CI):0.662-1·526, p = 0·98), respectively; the incidence of MI and cerebral infarction was 0·3% and 2·2% (95%CI: 0·786-32·415, p = 0·09) and 1·0% and 0·3% (95%CI: 0·051-3·662, p = 0·44), respectively. Post-hoc analyses of the 7-year observation period showed that these trends were comparable (21·9% and 19·2% in the control and pioglitazone groups, 95%CI: 0.618-1·237, p = 0·45).
INTERPRETATION: Pioglitazone could not reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with mild DM and previous MI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood glucose-lowering; Cardiovascular events; Diabetes mellitus; Myocardial infarction; PROBE study; Pioglitazone

Year:  2018        PMID: 31193597      PMCID: PMC6537525          DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EClinicalMedicine        ISSN: 2589-5370


  30 in total

1.  Congestive heart failure: fifty years of progress.

Authors:  E Braunwald; M R Bristow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques: new mechanisms and clinical targets.

Authors:  Peter Libby; Masanori Aikawa
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Heart failure.

Authors:  Mariell Jessup; Susan Brozena
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point.

Authors:  L Hansson; T Hedner; B Dahlöf
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Thiazolidinediones.

Authors:  Hannele Yki-Järvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel Levy; Satish Kenchaiah; Martin G Larson; Emelia J Benjamin; Michelle J Kupka; Kalon K L Ho; Joanne M Murabito; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones: taking a look beyond antidiabetic activity.

Authors:  S Giannini; M Serio; A Galli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; John Kjekshus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and atherogenesis: regulators of gene expression in vascular cells.

Authors:  Nikolaus Marx; Hélène Duez; Jean-Charles Fruchart; Bart Staels
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Acarbose treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: the STOP-NIDDM trial.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Chiasson; Robert G Josse; Ramon Gomis; Markolf Hanefeld; Avraham Karasik; Markku Laakso
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking pioglitazone as a cardioprotective agent: a new perspective on an overlooked drug.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nesti; Domenico Tricò; Alessandro Mengozzi; Andrea Natali
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.951

2.  GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Grenet; Shams Ribault; Giao Bao Nguyen; Faustine Glais; Augustin Metge; Thomas Linet; Behrouz Kassai-Koupai; Catherine Cornu; Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant; Sylvie Erpeldinger; Rémy Boussageon; Aurore Gouraud; Fabrice Bonnet; Michel Cucherat; Philippe Moulin; François Gueyffier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.