| Literature DB >> 31193382 |
Mohammad Darvishmotevalli1, Ahmad Zarei2, Maryam Moradnia3,1, Mohammad Noorisepehr4,5, Hamed Mohammadi6.
Abstract
Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to find the optimum parameters for COD and TOC removal from saline wastewaters using electrochemical oxidation process. The independent variables considered were reaction time, pH, salt concentration, and voltage. Optimization of parameters was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Quadratic regression equation was suggested as a model for prediction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiency. The results indicated that the COD and TOC removal efficiencies at the optimal conditions of pH 7.69, reaction time of 30.71 min, salt content of 30. 94 g/L and voltage of 7.41 V were 91.78% and 68.49%, respectively. In terms of COD and TOC removal efficiency, the coefficients of determination were found to be 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. This study suggests that electro-oxidation is an effective process in decreasing COD and TOC from saline wastewaters. Further, RSM was a suitable technique for optimization of the variables involved in COD and TOC removal through electro-oxidation process. •The findings demonstrate that response surface methodology is a good tool for the optimization of parameters of the experimental data.•A quadratic model was suggested as a good model for COD and TOC removal prediction.•The findings proved good agreement between the experimental data and the predicted equation.Entities:
Keywords: Electrochemical oxidation; Optimization; Optimization of saline wastewater treatment using electrochemical oxidation process: Prediction by RSM method; RSM; Saline wastewater
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193382 PMCID: PMC6527917 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1Schematic of the electro-oxidation reactor used in this study.
Experimental levels of independent process variables.
| Independent variables | Coded levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |
| pH | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Reaction time (min) | 20 | 30 | 40 |
| Salt concentration (g/L) | 12 | 22 | 32 |
| Voltage (V) | 3 | 6 | 9 |
Face central composite design (FCCD) for COD and TOC removal.
| Run | pH | Time (min) | Salinity (gr/L) | Voltage | COD removal (%) | TOC removal (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Actual | |||||
| 1 | 6 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 80 | 67 |
| 2 | 6 | 30 | 32 | 9 | 81 | 62 |
| 3 | 6 | 30 | 12 | 3 | 43 | 39 |
| 4 | 8 | 20 | 22 | 6 | 65.2 | 43.1 |
| 5 | 4 | 30 | 22 | 3 | 38 | 36 |
| 6 | 6 | 40 | 12 | 6 | 52 | 37 |
| 7 | 6 | 20 | 32 | 6 | 57 | 32 |
| 8 | 8 | 40 | 22 | 6 | 76 | 44 |
| 9 | 6 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 83 | 62 |
| 10 | 6 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 81 | 67 |
| 11 | 6 | 40 | 32 | 6 | 73 | 54 |
| 12 | 6 | 30 | 32 | 3 | 51 | 37 |
| 13 | 8 | 30 | 22 | 3 | 71 | 52 |
| 14 | 8 | 30 | 22 | 9 | 81.5 | 58.2 |
| 15 | 6 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 79.4 | 61.7 |
| 16 | 4 | 30 | 22 | 9 | 69 | 55 |
| 17 | 8 | 30 | 12 | 6 | 57.5 | 42 |
| 18 | 6 | 40 | 22 | 9 | 83 | 60 |
| 19 | 6 | 30 | 22 | 6 | 86 | 66 |
| 20 | 6 | 20 | 22 | 9 | 43 | 40 |
| 21 | 6 | 30 | 12 | 9 | 52 | 40 |
| 22 | 4 | 40 | 22 | 6 | 60 | 37 |
| 23 | 8 | 30 | 32 | 6 | 89 | 64.5 |
| 24 | 6 | 20 | 12 | 6 | 36 | 30 |
| 25 | 6 | 40 | 22 | 3 | 53 | 31 |
| 26 | 4 | 20 | 22 | 6 | 49 | 37 |
| 27 | 4 | 30 | 32 | 9 | 51 | 40 |
| 28 | 6 | 20 | 22 | 3 | 51 | 30 |
| 29 | 4 | 30 | 12 | 6 | 49 | 37 |
ANOVA for COD and TOC removal efficiency using electro-oxidation process.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean squares | F- value | P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD Removal (%) | TOC Removal (%) | COD Removal (%) | TOC Removal (%) | COD Removal (%) | TOC Removal (%) | COD Removal (%) | TOC Removal (%) | COD Removal (%) | TOC Removal (%) | |
| Model | 6788.24 | 4246.27 | 12 | 12 | 565.69 | 353.86 | 29.66 | 21.81 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| A-pH | 318.27 | 1 | 1 | 678 | 318.27 | 35.55 | 19.61 | <0.0001 | 0.0004 | |
| B-time | 585.2 | 215.9 | 1 | 1 | 585.2 | 215.9 | 30.69 | 13.30 | <0.0001 | 0.0022 |
| C-salinity | 1716.02 | 346..69 | 1 | 1 | 1716.02 | 346.69 | 89.98 | 21.36 | <0.0001 | 0.0003 |
| D-voltage | 1230.19 | 678 | 1 | 1 | 1230.19 | 678 | 64.51 | 41.78 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| AC | 76.56 | 95.06 | 1 | 1 | 76.56 | 95.06 | 4.01 | 5.86 | 0.0064 | 0.0278 |
| BC | 182.25 | 56.25 | 1 | 1 | 182.25 | 56.25 | 9.56 | 3.47 | 0.007 | 0.00811 |
| BD | 182.25 | 90.25 | 1 | 1 | 182.25 | 90.25 | 9.56 | 5.56 | 0.007 | 0.0314 |
| CD | 110.25 | 144 | 1 | 1 | 110.25 | 144 | 5.78 | 8.87 | 0.0278 | 0.0089 |
| A2 | 733.18 | 353.92 | 1 | 1 | 733.18 | 353.92 | 38.45 | 21.81 | <0.0001 | 0.0003 |
| B2 | 601.74 | 1707.4 | 1 | 1 | 601.74 | 1707.4 | 31.55 | 105.22 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| C2 | 479.09 | 828.14 | 1 | 1 | 479.09 | 828.14 | 25.12 | 51.03 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| D2 | 1265.76 | 424.18 | 1 | 1 | 1265.76 | 424.18 | 66.37 | 26.14 | <0.0001 | 0.0001 |
| Residual | 305.13 | 259.64 | 16 | 16 | 19.07 | 16.23 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 276.44 | 231.09 | 12 | 12 | 23.04 | 19.26 | 3.21 | 2.70 | 0.1351* | 0.1749* |
| Pure error | 28.69 | 28.55 | 4 | 4 | 7.17 | 7.14 | ||||
| Cor. total | 7093.37 | 4505.91 | 28 | 28 | ||||||
Fig. 2Normal probability plots of the studentized residuals for COD and TOC removal efficiency: (a, b), and residuals versus run plots for COD and TOC removal efficiency (c, d).
Fig. 3Relation between COD removal efficiency and the interaction terms by 3D plot: (a) interaction between pH- salt concentration (b), interaction between salt concentration-time (c), interaction between voltage- salt concentration, and (d) interaction between voltage- time.
Fig. 4Relation between TOC removal efficiency and the interaction terms by 3D plot: (a) interaction between pH-salt concentration (b), interaction between salt concentration-time (c), the interaction between voltage- salt concentration, and (d) the interaction between voltage-time.
Verification of experimental results at optimum conditions.
| Optimum condition | COD removal efficiency (%) | TOC removal efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental results | 89.92% | 67.12% |
| Model response | 91.78% | 68.49% |
| Error | 1.86 | 1.37 |
| Standard deviation | ±1.37 | ±0.96 |
| Subject Area: | Environmental Sciences |
| More specific subject area: | Electrochemical oxidation process |
| Method name: | Optimization of saline wastewater treatment using electrochemical oxidation process: Prediction by RSM method |
| Name and reference of original method: | O. Lefebvre, R. Moletta. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Res. 40 (2006) 3671–3682. |
| Resource availability: | The data are available with this article |