| Literature DB >> 31193183 |
Vladimir I Klichko1, Vladimir L Safonov2, Marina Yu Safonov2, Svetlana N Radyuk1.
Abstract
Recently, molecular hydrogen (H2) has become known as a new class of antioxidants and redox-modulating interventions. Effects of H2 have been documented for many acute and chronic pathological conditions. The present study was aimed at determining the effect of hydrogen on the physiology and longevity of Drosophila. The flies were given a patented food supplement consisting of a mixture of inert salts with metallic magnesium, which reacted with acidic aqueous solutions, thereby releasing hydrogen gas. The supplementation with hydrogen-rich food prolonged the life span of the wild-type strain. To gain insights into the effect of hydrogen, we used previously generated mutant under-expressing redox-regulating enzymes, peroxiredoxins, in mitochondria. The hydrogen-releasing material lessened the severe shortening of life span of the mutant. Hydrogen also delayed the development of intestinal dysfunction caused by under-expression of peroxiredoxins in the intestinal epithelium. Hydrogen also averted a significant decrease in the mobility of mutant flies that under-expressed peroxiredoxins globally or in specific tissues. Together, the results showed that the introduction of hydrogen to aging or short-lived flies could increase their survival, delay the development of the intestinal barrier dysfunction and significantly improve physical activity.Entities:
Keywords: DM, double mutant; Genetics; Molecular biology; ORP, oxidation-reduction potential; Physiology; Prx, peroxiredoxin; ROS, reactive oxygen species
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193183 PMCID: PMC6522691 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Effects of MagH2 on fly life spans. The y w flies were used in the experiment. Flies were reared on a regular fly food followed by transfer to food containing MagH2 on day 42. MagH2 was given at concentrations 0.1 mg/ml (0.1) and 0.3 mg/ml (0.3). Control – flies maintained on a regular food. Heat – solutions of MagH2 boiled before addition to fly food in order to remove hydrogen gas. Shown are representative data of two independent biological experiments. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in survivorship between controls and flies fed MagH2, as determined by the log rank test. Similar results were obtained in the biological replicate experiment. The data are summarized in Table 1 A.
Fig. 2Effects of MagH2 on mortality of the double mutant. The DM flies were obtained by underexpressing both mitochondrial Prxs globally with the Da-GAL4 driver. Flies were transferred to the MagH2-containing food on day 5, or just before the onset of a rapid death. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in survivorship between controls and flies fed MagH2 at optimal concentrations, 0.1 mg/ml for males and 0.3 mg/ml for females. Shown are representative data of two independent biological cohorts. Similar results were obtained in the biological replicate experiment. The data are summarized in Table 1 B.
Fig. 3Effects of MagH2 on survivorship and development of the “smurf” phenotype in flies under-expressing mitochondrial peroxiredoxins in the midgut. Underexpression of mitochondrial Prxs in the midgut epithelia was achieved by the NP1-GAL4 driver. A number of flies with the “smurf” phenotype was counted after feeding the flies with food containing the Blue dye added to food supplemented with optimal for males (0.1 mg/ml) and females (0.3 mg/ml) (see Figs. 1 and 2) concentrations of MagH2 or MagH2 heated controls. Percentage of the dead and ‘smurf’ flies is shown on the Y axis. Since the largest difference in mortality and the development of the “smurf” phenotype was observed in young flies, a statistical analysis was performed at the time point when 10% of the flies died or developed the “smurf” phenotype. Statistical analysis showed significant difference (p < 0.05) in age, which corresponded to 10% mortality or the appearance of “smurf” flies between heated controls (heat) and flies that received unheated hydrogen-producing MagH2. Similar results were obtained in the biological replicate experiment. The data are summarized in Table 1 C.
Life spans of flies under different treatments. A and B: The experiments were conducted as described in the Fig. 1 (A) and Fig. 2 (B) legends. Values for median age obtained in two independent experiments are listed in columns 1 and 3. Columns 2 and 4 indicate the percentage of median age changes between experimental flies and flies maintained on a regular food (Control). Statistically significant differences between control and flies treated with MagH2, determined by the log-rank test (*P < 0.05), are indicated by asterisks. C: The experiments were conducted as described in the Fig. 3 legend. The age of the flies at 10% of mortality and the “smurf” phenotype are shown in columns 1 and 3. Values are obtained in two independent experiments. Columns 2 and 4 show the percentage change between flies fed MagH2 and flies fed heated MagH2 solutions that served as a hydrogen-free control. Statistically significant differences between flies fed MagH2 and flies fed heated MagH2 solutions, determined by two-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05), are indicated by asterisks and bold. There were no statistically significant differences between mortality and the development of the “smurf” phenotype.
| A | Males | Females | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Median age (days) | % | Median age (days) | % |
| Control | 59; 56 | 54; 51 | ||
| MagH2 | 68; 64 | 67; 65 | ||
| MagH2 heat | 58.5; 57 | 99; 102 | 57; 52 | 106; 102 |
Fig. 4Effects of MagH2 on negative geotaxis. Shown are fly lines under-expressing mitochondrial Prxs globally (Da-DM), in motor neurons (D42-DM) and in the midgut (NP1-DM), as well as y w control. All flies tested for geotaxis were one week old, or at the age when their mortality did not exceed 10%. Flies were fed hydrogen-producing food starting from day 1–2 after eclosion, or 5–6 days prior to the geotaxis experiments. Assays were performed as indicated in Materials and Methods and geotaxis was expressed as a number of climbers/jumpers to the total number of flies. The activity of approximately 50 flies for each fly line was measured. Analysis was conducted in triplicate for each of two biological replicates. Shown are means ± SEM (n = 6). Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (*P < 0.05).