| Literature DB >> 31193166 |
E A Helmy1, S A Soliman2, Tarek M Abdel-Ghany3, Magdah Ganash4.
Abstract
Egyptian traditional cheese has a long history and still represent an important part of the Egyptian diet. A lot of scientific studies in probiotic topic is usually related to bacteria, in particular lactic acid bacteria, and there is lack of information about potentially probiotic yeasts, except Saccharomyces boulardii. In the current study, 50 samples of traditional Egyptian buffalo sweetened cheese randomly were collected from five local Egyptian markets for yeast isolation. Isolated yeast species were identified using API20 kits techniques and the most frequently isolates were genotypically confirmed identified using the variability in the ITS rDNA. Appropriate in vitro assays have been conducted to examine their probiotic potentiality counting acid and bile salts tolerance, stimulated gastrointestinal tract tolerance, cell adhesion/hydrophobic characteristics, killer toxin productivity and antimicrobial activity against some clinical and food borne pathogens. The incidence of the obtained yeast taxa was found to be; S. cerevisiae (25%), Wickerhamomyces anomalus (23%), Pichia kudriavzevii (19%), Kluyveromyces lactis (17%), Geotrichum candidum (6%), Debaryomyces hansenii (4%), Candida tropicalis (3%), Cryptococcus neoformans (1%), Rhodotorula glabrata (1%) and Trichosporon cutaneum (1%). The most frequently isolates (S. cerevisiae, W. anomalus and P. kudriavzevii) exhibited high tolerance to bile salts elevated concentrations up to 2.0 %. W. anomalus could withstand the elevated bile salts concentrations and it was the most tolerable yeast isolate to intestinal juice environment. W. anomalus showed the lowest eradication from intestinal mucosa as indicated by the hydrophobicity average percentage 11.891% to xylene comparing to the P. kudriavzevii which showed the highest hydrophobicity average percentage of 46.185% to chloroform. Yeast isolates S. cerevisiae, W. anomalus and P. kudriavzevii (particularly W. anomalus) were recognized as ideal potentially probiotic model having in vitro properties that make them favorable candidates for probiotic applications.Entities:
Keywords: Food Science; Microbiology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31193166 PMCID: PMC6520606 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Morphological characteristics and features of the yeast isolates.
| Yeast Isolates | Colonies and cell Description | Sediment Formation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Glistening | Margin | Budding | Cell Shape | Cell diameter (μm) | Appearance | Light turbidity | |
| Wh/Cr | + | R | Multi | Ovoid/elongate | 1.3−6 × 3.3–14 | Sprightly | + | |
| Wh/Cr | + | R | Multi | Ellipsoidal/Cylindrical | 2−6 × 3−11 | Sprightly | + | |
| Wh/Cr | + | R | Multi | Round/ovoid | 5–10 | Sprightly | + | |
Wh/Cr, white/Cream; R, Regular;+,Present.
Potentiality to ferment some compounds of the yeast isolates.
| Biochemical tests | Yeast Isolates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Fermentation | Lactose | − | − | − |
| Glucose | + | + | + | |
| Raffinose | + | + | + | |
| Sucrose | + | + | + | |
| Galactose | + | - | − | |
| Maltose | − | − | − | |
| Starch | − | − | − | |
| Assimilation of Carbon Compounds | Citrate | − | − | − |
| Galactose | + | − | − | |
| Maltose | − | − | − | |
| Butane 2.3 diol | − | − | − | |
| propane-1,2-diol | − | − | − | |
| Assimilation of Nitrogen Compounds | Tryptophan | − | − | − |
| Ethylamine | − | − | − | |
| DL-L lysine | − | − | − | |
| Complementary tests | 5 % NaCl | + | + | + |
| 10 % NaCl | − | − | − | |
| 16% NaCl | − | − | − | |
| 50 % glucose | + | + | + | |
| 60% glucose | − | − | − | |
| Acetic Acid Tolerance (1%) | − | − | − | |
| Hydrolysis of Urea | − | − | − | |
| Gelatin liquefaction | − | − | − | |
(+); Positive reaction (−); Negative reaction.
Fig. 1Incidence % of the isolated yeasts using conventional phenotypic as well as biochemical identification protocols.
Fig. 2Phylogenetic relationships between the three Probiotic yeasts A; P. kudriavzevii QLB, B; W. anomalus HN1; C; S. cerevisiae gbLKX237673.1 and the ITS sequences of closely related fungal strains retrieved from NCBI Gen Bank.
Effect of simulated gastric juice at different pH values on the viability of investigated yeasts. Data represents the means of standard deviation of triplicate assays.
| pH | Colony forming units per ml (CFU.ml−1) of yeast isolates* at incubation time (hrs.) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||
| S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | |
| 2.0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 8.2×106 | 9.3×106 | 7.2×106 | 6.2×105 | 7.3×105 | 5.2×105 | 5.9×104 | 6.7×104 | 4.8×104 | 6.7×103 | 7.8×103 | 5.5×103 |
| 2.5 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 3.8×107 | 4.9×107 | 2.6×107 | 1.8×106 | 2.9×106 | 1.3×106 | 8.2×105 | 9.3×105 | 7.2×105 | 4.8×104 | 5.6×104 | 3.5×104 |
| 3.0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 2.3×108 | 3.8×108 | 1.6×108 | 6.7×107 | 7.9×107 | 5.6×107 | 2.1×106 | 3.3×106 | 1.8×106 | 7.8×105 | 8.5×105 | 6.5×105 |
| 3.5 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 8.1×108 | 9.3×108 | 7.2×108 | 2.4×108 | 3.6×108 | 1.8×108 | 6.8×107 | 7.5×107 | 5.4×107 | 2.4×107 | 3.7×107 | 1.9×107 |
| 4.0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 3.9×109 | 4.7×109 | 2.7×109 | 2.8×109 | 3.7×109 | 1.9×109 | 2.6×108 | 3.5×108 | 1.9×108 | 1.6×108 | 2.7×108 | 1.9×108 |
| Control | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.8×109 | 4.8×109 | 4.8×109 |
S.c., S. cerevisiae gbLKX237673.1; W.a., W. anomalus HN1; P.k., P. kudriavzevii QLB. Control experiments were without any treatments.
Effect of simulated gastric juice of different pH values on the growth rate % (OD at 600 nm) of investigated yeasts.
| Time (h) and Increase (%) | pH | Yeast isolates growth (OD at 600 nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.5 | 0.209 | 0.088 | 0.207 |
| 2.0 | 0.163 | 0.049 | 0.152 | |
| 3.0 | 0.199 | 0.070 | 0.187 | |
| 1 | 1.5 | 0.214 | 0.174 | 0.203 |
| 2.0 | 0.287 | 0.100 | 0.276 | |
| 3.0 | 0.204 | 0.089 | 0.203 | |
| Increase (%) | 1.5 | 2.30 | 97.7 | 1.20 |
| 2.0 | 76.0 | 104.0 | 65.0 | |
| 3.0 | 2.50 | 27.0 | 1.40 | |
| 2 | 1.5 | 0.383 | 0.324 | 0.172 |
| 2.0 | 0.460 | 0.151 | 0.350 | |
| 3.0 | 0.453 | 0.234 | 0.342 | |
| Increase (%) | 1.5 | 35.4 | 268.2 | 24.3 |
| 2.0 | 182.2 | 208.0 | 171.1 | |
| 3.0 | 127.6 | 234.3 | 116.5 | |
| 3 | 1.5 | 0.443 | 0.279 | 0.332 |
| 2.0 | 0.233 | 0.070 | 0.122 | |
| 3.0 | 0.568 | 0.211 | 0.457 | |
| Increase (%) | 1.5 | 111.9 | 217.0 | 100.8 |
| 2.0 | 43.0 | 42.0 | 32.0 | |
| 3.0 | 185.4 | 217.0 | 100.8 | |
Effect of different bile salt concentrations on the viability of investigated yeasts. Data represents the means of standard deviation of triplicate assays.
| Bile salt (%) | Incubation time (hrs) | Colony forming units per ml (CFU. ml−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | |
| 2 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | |
| 3 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | |
| 4 | 4.8×109 | 4.8×109 | 4.8×109 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 2.6×107 | 3.4×107 | 1.8×107 | |
| 2 | 1.6×106 | 2.1×106 | 1.1×106 | |
| 3 | 7.5×105 | 8.2×105 | 6.8×105 | |
| 4 | 4.5×104 | 5.3×104 | 3.6×104 | |
| 0.5 | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 1.6×107 | 3.2×107 | 1.2×107 | |
| 2 | 4.7×105 | 5.2×105 | 3.3×105 | |
| 3 | 8.4×104 | 9.2×104 | 7.5×104 | |
| 4 | 2.6×104 | 3.2×104 | 1.8×104 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 5.6×106 | 6.3×106 | 4.6×106 | |
| 2 | 1.7×105 | 2.3×105 | 1.5×105 | |
| 3 | 2.5×104 | 3.4×104 | 1.8×104 | |
| 4 | 1.6×104 | 2.2×104 | 1.2×104 | |
| 1.5 | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 2.5×106 | 3.1×106 | 1.5×106 | |
| 2 | 4.6×105 | 5.2×105 | 3.5×105 | |
| 3 | 8.4×104 | 9.1×104 | 7.6×104 | |
| 4 | 8.6×103 | 9.7×103 | 7.9×103 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 5.7×105 | 6.4×105 | 4.6×105 | |
| 2 | 2.5×104 | 3.1×104 | 1.8×104 | |
| 3 | 5.8×103 | 6.1×103 | 4.3×103 | |
| 4 | 1.7×103 | 2.3×103 | 1.5×103 | |
Control experiments were without any treatments.
Effect of bile salts concentrations on the growth rate % of investigated yeasts. Data represents the means of standard deviation of triplicate assays.
| Time (h) and Increase (%) | Bile salts concentrations (%) | Yeast isolates growth (OD at 600 nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.2 | 0.025 | 0.037 | 0.014 |
| 0.5 | 0.078 | 0.064 | 0.067 | |
| 1.0 | 0. 115 | 0.031 | 0.104 | |
| 1 | 0.2 | 0.038 | 0.047 | 0.027 |
| 0.5 | 0.134 | 0.110 | 0.123 | |
| 1.0 | 0.127 | 0.047 | 0.116 | |
| Increase (%) | 0.2 | 52.0 | 27.0 | 41.0 |
| 0.5 | 71.70 | 71.8 | 60.60 | |
| 1.0 | 10.40 | 51.6 | 9.30 | |
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.077 | 0.069 | 0.066 |
| 0.5 | 0.167 | 0.154 | 0.156 | |
| 1.0 | 0.220 | 0.064 | 0.101 | |
| Increase (%) | 0.2 | 208.0 | 86.5 | 104.0 |
| 0.5 | 114.0 | 140.6 | 103.0 | |
| 1.0 | 91.30 | 106.4 | 80.20 | |
| 3 | 0.2 | 0.118 | 0.249 | 0.107 |
| 0.5 | 0.209 | 0.192 | 0.108 | |
| 1.0 | 0.243 | 0.113 | 0.132 | |
| Increase (%) | 0.2 | 372.0 | 572.0 | 261.0 |
| 0.5 | 168.0 | 200.0 | 154.0 | |
| 1.0 | 111.3 | 264.5 | 100.2 | |
Effect of Intestinal Juice on The Viability of Investigated Yeasts. Data represents the means of standard deviation of triplicate assays.
| Bile salt (%) | Incubation time (hrs) | Colony forming units per ml (CFU ml−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | |
| 2 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | |
| 3 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | 4.9×109 | |
| 4 | 4.8×109 | 4.8×109 | 4.8×109 | |
| Intestinal Juice | 0 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 | 5.0×109 |
| 1 | 3.1×106 | 3.1×106 | 3.1×106 | |
| 2 | 4.6×105 | 5.2×105 | 3.5×105 | |
| 3 | 8.4×104 | 9.1×104 | 7.6×104 | |
| 4 | 8.6×103 | 9.7×103 | 7.9×103 | |
Control experiments were without any treatments.
Effect of intestinal juice on the growth rate % of investigated yeasts. Data represents the means of standard deviation of triplicate assays.
| Time (h) and Increase (%) | Yeast isolates growth (OD at 600 nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.043 | 0.052 | 0.031 |
| 1 | 0.069 | 0.081 | 0.051 |
| Increase (%) | 13.20 | 14.90 | 12.90 |
| 2 | 0.078 | 0.093 | 0.060 |
| Increase (%) | 40.60 | 61.50 | 33.30 |
| 3 | 0.024 | 0.073 | 0.045 |
| Increase (%) | −44.0 | −12.90 | −45.20 |
Fig. 3Hydrophobic Behavior of Investigated Yeasts Towards Different Solvent Systems. S. c., S. cerevisiae gbLKX237673.1; W. a., W. anomalus HN1; P.k., P. kudriavzevii QLB.
Hydrophobicity percentage (%) of investigated yeasts to different solvents.
| Time (h) | Xylol | Ethyl acetate | Chloroform | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | S.c. | W.a. | P.k. | |
| 1 | 12.23 | 11.13 | 13.33 | 15.35 | 14.25 | 16.45 | 26.29 | 25.19 | 27.39 |
| 2 | 12.87 | 11.77 | 13.97 | 22.31 | 21.21 | 23.41 | 39.19 | 38.18 | 40.29 |
| 3 | 13.45 | 12.35 | 14.55 | 30.67 | 29.57 | 31.77 | 51.33 | 50.23 | 52.43 |
| 4 | 13.87 | 12.67 | 14.97 | 36.49 | 34.39 | 37.59 | 63.53 | 62.43 | 64.63 |
| Average | 13.105 | 11.891 | 14.205 | 26.205 | 24.855 | 27.305 | 45.085 | 44.075 | 46.185 |
S.c., S. cerevisiae gbLKX237673.1; W.a., W. anomalus HN1; P.k., P. kudriavzevii QLB.
Antimicrobial activity of investigated yeasts against different clinical and food borne pathogens.
| Yeast isolate | Inhibition Zone Diameter (cm) of Bacteria & Normal Flora | ||||||
| 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.4 | |
| 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.2 | |
| 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.9 | |
| Yeast isolate | Inhibition Zone Diameter (cm) of Filamentous Fungi & Yeasts | ||||||
| 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | |
| 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
| 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.2 | |
Toxin-sensitive yeast.
Fig. 4Canonical Discriminant Function of viable population analyses represented by the growth rate % of investigated three yeasts as potential probiotics under all tested conditions. Where; the growth rate % of P. kudriavzevii QLB at zero time treatment (A) the growth rate % of W. anomalus HN1 at zero time treatment (B) the growth rate % of S. cerevisiae gbLKX237673.1 at zero time treatment (C) the growth rate % of P. kudriavzevii QLB at end time treatment (D) the growth rate % of W. anomalus HN1 at end time treatment (E) the growth rate % of S. cerevisiae gbLKX237673.1 at end time treatment (F).