Literature DB >> 31192673

State mental health agency officials' preferences for and sources of behavioral health research.

Jonathan Purtle1, Félice Lê-Scherban2, Katherine L Nelson3, Paul T Shattuck4, Enola K Proctor5, Ross C Brownson6.   

Abstract

State mental health agencies (SMHAs) are integral to public behavioral health service systems. As such, senior-level officials within SMHAs are important targets for advocacy and dissemination of behavioral health research findings. Evidence-informed decision making in SMHAs can potentially be enhanced by developing summaries of behavioral health research (e.g., policy briefs) that reflect SMHA officials' information preferences, but knowledge about these preferences is lacking. An exploratory study was conducted with the aims of characterizing senior-level SMHA officials' preferences for behavioral health research and describing where they turn for this research when making policy decisions. A cross-sectional, web-based survey of senior-level SMHA officials (1 per state) was conducted in March-May 2017 (n = 43, response rate = 84%). The features of behavioral health research that SMHA officials identified as "very important" most frequently were research being relevant to state residents (93.0%), providing data on cost-effectiveness (86.0%) and budget impact (81.4%), and being presented concisely (81.0%). The primary sources that SMHA officials turned to for behavioral research when making policy decisions were professional organizations (79.1%), SMHA agency staff (60.5%), and university researchers (55.8%). Compared with state legislators' responses to the same survey questions, results suggest that senior-level SMHA officials and legislators have similar preferences for behavioral health research but turn to different sources for this research. Advocates and researchers who seek to promote evidence-informed decision making in SMHAs should consider developing policy briefs that are concise, provide state-level prevalence data about behavioral conditions, and contain economic evaluation data, and they should disseminate these materials to multiple sources. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31192673      PMCID: PMC6908783          DOI: 10.1037/ser0000364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Serv        ISSN: 1541-1559


  21 in total

1.  Using Evidence to Influence Policy and Improve Practice.

Authors:  Michael Hogan
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Charles Royer; Reid Ewing; Timothy D McBride
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Advocacy as Key to Structural Competency in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Laurence J Kirmayer; Rachel Kronick; Cécile Rousseau
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 21.596

4.  Research, Data, and Evidence-Based Treatment Use in State Behavioral Health Systems, 2001-2012.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Suzanne E U Kerns; Michael D Pullmann; Spencer W Hensley; Ted Lutterman; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Uses of Research Evidence by State Legislators Who Prioritize Behavioral Health Issues.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Elizabeth A Dodson; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.

Authors:  Kathryn Oliver; Simon Innvar; Theo Lorenc; Jenny Woodman; James Thomas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  Pauline Zardo; Alex Collie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  A review of policy dissemination and implementation research funded by the National Institutes of Health, 2007-2014.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Rachel Peters; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Jane W Seymour; Maximilian J Pany; Adeline Goss; Zachary F Meisel; David Grande
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Organizational Supports for Research Evidence Use in State Public Health Agencies: A Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Hengrui Hu; Peg Allen; Yan Yan; Rodrigo S Reis; Rebekah R Jacob; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing two federal financing strategies on penetration and sustainment of the adolescent community reinforcement approach for substance use disorders: protocol for a mixed-method study.

Authors:  Alex R Dopp; Sarah B Hunter; Mark D Godley; Chau Pham; Bing Han; Rosanna Smart; Jonathan Cantor; Beau Kilmer; Grace Hindmarch; Isabelle González; Lora L Passetti; Kelli L Wright; Gregory A Aarons; Jonathan Purtle
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Determinants of using children's mental health research in policymaking: variation by type of research use and phase of policy process.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Katherine L Nelson; Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz; Mary M McKay; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Coordination of sustainable financing for evidence-based youth mental health treatments: protocol for development and evaluation of the fiscal mapping process.

Authors:  Alex R Dopp; Marylou Gilbert; Jane Silovsky; Jeanne S Ringel; Susan Schmidt; Beverly Funderburk; Ashley Jorgensen; Byron J Powell; Douglas A Luke; David Mandell; Daniel Edwards; Mellicent Blythe; Dana Hagele
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-01-04

4.  Tailoring dissemination of evidence to preferences of tobacco control partners: results from an academic-community partnership.

Authors:  Virginia Mckay; Mia Vogel; Todd Combs; Laura Brossart; Amy Endrizal; Stephanie Andersen; Timothy Poor; Margaret Mahoney; Douglas Luke
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2022-04-22

5.  Acquisition of Information About Innovative Practices in Outpatient Mental Health Clinics.

Authors:  Karissa M Fenwick; Lawrence A Palinkas; Michael S Hurlburt; Rebecca D Lengnick-Hall; Sarah M Horwitz; Kimberly E Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.