Literature DB >> 31192668

Disrupting facial action increases risk taking.

Stephanie M Carpenter1, Paula M Niedenthal1.   

Abstract

Sometimes risk involves taking actions that in and of themselves elicit emotion, often fearful emotions. Across two studies we test the hypothesis that preventing facial actions associated with fear and anxiety responses during a risky decision task leads to greater risk taking. We first demonstrate that while performing the balloon analogue risk task (Lejuez et al., 2002), individuals make grimaces associated with anxious anticipation. In Study 1 (n = 120), experimental condition participants had inflexible medical tape attached to their foreheads to disrupt movement of the brow, and they wore a mouth guard that interfered with actions involving the mouth. Tape was also applied to control participants' faces, but it did not disrupt facial action, and they did not wear a mouth guard. All participants performed the balloon analogue risk task, in which a greater number of balloon pumps signals more risk taking. Study 2 (n = 202) served as a replication and minor extension that added a second risk task also predicted to elicit anxious anticipation (i.e., a jack-in-the-box toy). As hypothesized, disrupting the activation of facial muscles led to more balloon pumps and lever turns. Our findings suggest that facial expressions modulate risk taking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31192668      PMCID: PMC6908769          DOI: 10.1037/emo0000597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  27 in total

1.  Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity.

Authors:  D DeSteno; R E Petty; D T Wegener; D D Rucker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-03

2.  Fear, anger, and risk.

Authors:  J S Lerner; D Keltner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-07

3.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Mapping correspondence between facial mimicry and emotion recognition in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Marta Ponari; Massimiliano Conson; Nunzia Pina D'Amico; Dario Grossi; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-05-28

5.  Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.

Authors:  A Bechara; H Damasio; D Tranel; A R Damasio
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  A R Damasio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.

Authors:  C A Smith; P C Ellsworth
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-04

8.  Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: a test of the facial feedback hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert Soussignan
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2002-03

9.  How Does Facial Feedback Modulate Emotional Experience?

Authors:  Joshua Ian Davis; Ann Senghas; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2009-10-01

10.  Blocking mimicry makes true and false smiles look the same.

Authors:  Magdalena Rychlowska; Elena Cañadas; Adrienne Wood; Eva G Krumhuber; Agneta Fischer; Paula M Niedenthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Faces synchronize when communication through spoken language is prevented.

Authors:  Fangyun Zhao; Adrienne Wood; Bilge Mutlu; Paula Niedenthal
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2022-03-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.