Literature DB >> 22642357

Mapping correspondence between facial mimicry and emotion recognition in healthy subjects.

Marta Ponari1, Massimiliano Conson, Nunzia Pina D'Amico, Dario Grossi, Luigi Trojano.   

Abstract

We aimed at verifying the hypothesis that facial mimicry is causally and selectively involved in emotion recognition. For this purpose, in Experiment 1, we explored the effect of tonic contraction of muscles in upper or lower half of participants' face on their ability to recognize emotional facial expressions. We found that the "lower" manipulation specifically impaired recognition of happiness and disgust, the "upper" manipulation impaired recognition of anger, while both manipulations affected recognition of fear; recognition of surprise and sadness were not affected by either blocking manipulations. In Experiment 2, we verified whether emotion recognition is hampered by stimuli in which an upper or lower half-face showing an emotional expression is combined with a neutral half-face. We found that the neutral lower half-face interfered with recognition of happiness and disgust, whereas the neutral upper half impaired recognition of anger; recognition of fear and sadness was impaired by both manipulations, whereas recognition of surprise was not affected by either manipulation. Taken together, the present findings support simulation models of emotion recognition and provide insight into the role of mimicry in comprehension of others' emotional facial expressions. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642357     DOI: 10.1037/a0028588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  33 in total

1.  Sensorimotor simulation and emotion processing: Impairing facial action increases semantic retrieval demands.

Authors:  Joshua D Davis; Piotr Winkielman; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Dynamic grounding of emotion concepts.

Authors:  Piotr Winkielman; Seana Coulson; Paula Niedenthal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Facial expressions as a model to test the role of the sensorimotor system in the visual perception of the actions.

Authors:  Sonia Mele; Valentina Ghirardi; Laila Craighero
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Disrupting facial action increases risk taking.

Authors:  Stephanie M Carpenter; Paula M Niedenthal
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-06-13

5.  Empathic Understanding: Benefits of Perspective-Taking and Facial Mimicry Instructions are Mediated by Self-Other Overlap.

Authors:  Alison N Cooke; Doris G Bazzini; Lisa A Curtin; Lisa J Emery
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  Audio and visual speech emotion activate the left pre-supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Joseph Rovetti; Fran Copelli; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Beholders' sensorimotor engagement enhances aesthetic rating of pictorial facial expressions of pain.

Authors:  Martina Ardizzi; F Ferroni; F Siri; M A Umiltà; A Cotti; M Calbi; E Fadda; D Freedberg; V Gallese
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-03

8.  Altering sensorimotor feedback disrupts visual discrimination of facial expressions.

Authors:  Adrienne Wood; Gary Lupyan; Steven Sherrin; Paula Niedenthal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

9.  Effects of posed smiling on memory for happy and sad facial expressions.

Authors:  Maria Kuehne; Tino Zaehle; Janek S Lobmaier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Blocking facial mimicry during binocular rivalry modulates visual awareness of faces with a neutral expression.

Authors:  Thomas Quettier; Filippo Gambarota; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Paola Sessa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.