Literature DB >> 31192630

Development and public release of the Penn Reading Assessment Computerized Adaptive Test (PRA-CAT) for premorbid IQ.

Mikhal A Yudien1, Tyler M Moore1, Allison M Port1, Kosha Ruparel1, Raquel E Gur1, Ruben C Gur1.   

Abstract

An important component of neuropsychological testing is assessment of premorbid intelligence to estimate a patient's ability independent of neurological impairment. A common test of premorbid IQ-namely, the Reading section of the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)-has been shown to have high measurement error in the high ability range, is unnecessarily long (55 items), and is proprietary. We describe the development of an alternative, nonproprietary, computerized adaptive test for premorbid IQ, the Penn Reading Assessment (PRA-CAT). PRA-CAT items were calibrated using a 1-parameter item response theory model in a large community sample (N = 9,498), Ages 8 to 21, and the resulting parameters were used to simulate computerized adaptive testing sessions. Simulations demonstrated that the PRA-CAT achieves low measurement error (0.25; equivalent to Cronbach's alpha = .94) and acceptable measurement error (0.40; Cronbach's alpha = .84) after only 18 and 6 items, respectively (on average). Correlation of WRAT and PRA-CAT scores with numerous clinical, cognitive, demographic, and neuroimaging criteria suggests that validity of PRA-CAT score interpretation is comparable (and sometimes superior) with the WRAT. The fully functioning PRA-CAT for public use (including item parameter estimates reported here) has been built using the open-source program Concerto, and can be installed by anyone on a local computer or on the "cloud." Given the length and proprietary nature of the WRAT, the PRA-CAT shows promise as a potential alternative (and with minimal or no cost). Further validation in the context of neurological injury is needed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31192630      PMCID: PMC6706308          DOI: 10.1037/pas0000738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  26 in total

1.  Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2003-02

2.  Reading on the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and parental education as predictors of IQ: comparison with the Barona formula.

Authors:  D A Kareken; R C Gur; A J Saykin
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Estimating premorbid intelligence: comparison of traditional and contemporary methods across the intelligence continuum.

Authors:  Stefanie L Griffin; Monica Rivera Mindt; Eugene J Rankin; A Jocelyn Ritchie; James G Scott
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 4.  Literacy and health outcomes.

Authors:  N D Berkman; D A Dewalt; M P Pignone; S L Sheridan; K N Lohr; L Lux; S F Sutton; T Swinson; A J Bonito
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)       Date:  2004-01

5.  Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms.

Authors:  James M Clark; Allan Paivio
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

6.  Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: a survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members.

Authors:  Laura A Rabin; William B Barr; Leslie A Burton
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Jan Richard; Paul Hughett; Monica E Calkins; Larry Macy; Warren B Bilker; Colleen Brensinger; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Effects of race and socioeconomic status on the relative influence of education and literacy on cognitive functioning.

Authors:  Vonetta M Dotson; Melissa H Kitner-Triolo; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  The comparability of the WRAT-R reading test and NAART as estimates of premorbid intelligence in neurologically impaired patients.

Authors:  B Johnstone; C D Callahan; C J Kapila; D E Bouman
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.813

10.  The influence of reading ability on subsequent changes in verbal IQ in the teenage years.

Authors:  Sue Ramsden; Fiona M Richardson; Goulven Josse; Clare Shakeshaft; Mohamed L Seghier; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  2 in total

1.  When CAT is not an option: complementary methods of test abbreviation for neurocognitive batteries.

Authors:  Tyler M Moore; Ellyn R Butler; J Cobb Scott; Allison M Port; Kosha Ruparel; Lucky J Njokweni; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.871

2.  A Joint Analysis of Multi-Paradigm fMRI Data With Its Application to Cognitive Study.

Authors:  Yuntong Bai; Yun Gong; Jianchao Bai; Jingyu Liu; Hong-Wen Deng; Vince Calhoun; Yu-Ping Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 10.048

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.